Channel
@fanzyOFM
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
110subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002114471746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fanzyOFM |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 8 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fanzyOFM |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 110 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 111 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 112 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 113 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 113 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 114 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
19 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 52.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 15.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2024 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
New month new goals! Let’s get it!
❤6
Signed Tierny
Who got the best results?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Signed TrulySami
2. Before and after
👍2
Signed TrulySami
1. Before and after
Signed TrulySami
So me and my business partner have been doing a monthly gym partner challenge between the 2 of us because over the past year we have been so focused on our business and not so much our fitness. we have just completed our first month and want you guys to vote which one of us have had the best results so far..
❤1
Signed TrulySami
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeV8vJeG/ You can learn something about marking this video
Signed Tierny
@laugh - used his middle man service! If you are buying things make sure to keep your funds safe with middle man service.
Signed Tierny
Very good so far!
Signed Tierny
VINE coming back….? Maybe who knows If tiktok gets banned Twitter and VINE will blow!
❤1
Signed Tierny
This is not an onlyfans girl however there’s soo much here you can utilise. https://www.instagram.com/reel/C1e6ql7IqzH/?igsh=dXJqamF1ZGgyZGRt This is great branding - the style, the clothes, music, colours, editing. The profile pic, even to the linktree design, and the highlights of the profile. It’s very thoughtful and works wonderful. Use this as a template to work from and create a brand around your model. T…
👍4🔥1
Signed Tierny
New changes to IG rolling out -
Signed Tierny
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @fanzyOFM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who got the best results?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2024 to 18 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fanzy OFM updates” (@fanzyOFM), 110 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanzyOFM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.