Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fansly заметки от Коржика

@fanslyfromcorgi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,647subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745254097
TypeChannel
Username@fanslyfromcorgi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fanslyfromcorgi

Growth

4,6474,6584,652.56 August 2026 — 4,657 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,658 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,655 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,647 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,645–4,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:544,647-8
10 Aug 2026, 14:314,655-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:254,658+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:474,657first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 4,647 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.919%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (17 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,675
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54091550847244809035836.9%
🥰3522.3%
👍2616.6%
👏2314.6%
🤯159.55%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fanslyfromcorgi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC731 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

От 20к до 56к за 4 месяца сотрудничества с нашим онлифанс агентством или пришло время поделиться с вами кейсами 💓 Модель - достаточно известная пх актриса с активными соц. сетями, работала с разными командами, но "потолок" на анкете не превышал 30к$, а на момент старта сотрудничества с нами актуальный результат был 20к$. Основной запрос модели был - пробить этот потолок и стабильно делать более высокие чеки на стра

5 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC794 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тысячи подписчиков на фансли, а баланса нет или почему аудитория не приносит доход 😾 Судя по обсуждениям в адалт чатиках - тема актуальная. И на самом деле, с ней сталкиваются многие модели: количество мемберов на страничке растет, а баланс нет. По моему опыту, причины тут разные и их может быть несколько сразу: 1. Подписчик и покупатель - разные люди Большая часть аудитории фрилоудеры и приходят за бесплатным кон

custom 54091550847244809037👏4

31 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC884 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💸Выводим токены с Chaturbate💸 Классные ребятки делают быстрый и безумно простой способ вывода токенов с Chaturbate и Stripchat 😎 💗 Работают с декабря 2021 года 💗 Зачисление денег на вашу карту в течение 5 - 10 минут. 💗 Вывод на карты Казахстана 🇰🇿 Грузии 🇬🇪 Турции 🇹🇷 США 🇺🇸 Армении 🇦🇲 Кыргызстана 🇰🇬 💗 Вывод на любые российские карты по СБП! 💗 Минимальная сумма вывода 15$. 💗 Зачисление от физ. лиц 💗 Возможно

custom 54091550847244809035👏4🥰4🤯1

31 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,210 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Потеряла сотни подписчиков и стала зарабатывать на 30% больше 👀 Нашла на реддит кейс, который меня заинтересовал. Модель сама убрала большую часть контента из подписки, потеряла кучу сабов и вышла на лучший доход за все время. Рассказываю про ее подход 👇 Как было раньше? Подписка за 20$, а внутри большое количество контента, в том числе обнаженного. Отдельно видео не продавались, все было в подписке. Поэтому фан н

custom 540915508472448090312🥰4

31 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC786 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Модель Соню Мармеладову приговорили к 3 годам условно по делу о распространении порно Как передает корреспондент «Осторожно, новости» из Мещанского суда Москвы, девушку признали виновной в распространении порнографических материалов через интернет. Также Соню оштрафовали на 4,8 млн рублей. OnlyKitty 💖

🤯14👍4

22 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC≈3,270 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Выгорание и как с ним бороться 🥺 Когда ты кому-то говоришь, что у тебя выгорание, в ответ обычно слышишь советы вроде “тебе нужно больше отдыхать или взять выходной”. Советы классные, но проблема в том, что часто ты просто не можешь себе этого позволить. Время - деньги, и в адалте они зарабатываются день в день: работаешь - деньги есть, не работаешь - денег нет. Не все могут взять выходной, а тем более отпуск. Я, н

custom 540915508472448090310🥰4

15 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC875 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Первый день в адалте, с чего начать? Часть 1 Если вы давно в адалте, то хотя бы раз слышали от своих знакомых «А че, как вообще попасть к вам на работу?». Я слышала это бесчисленное количество раз 😁 Несколько таких знакомых стали моими реддиторами и работают со мной уже 3 года, другим же я дала пару советов. Когда такой вопрос задается слишком настойчиво и довольно часто, отвечать уже не сильно хочется. Для всех, к

🥰10👍3👏3

15 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,190 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На просторах киттенс я нашла полезную инфу для новичков и не только о том, на что стоит обратить внимание при поиске вакансии секстера. Сразу добавлю от себя - обязательно пробивайте агентство в адалт-помойке и в чатах, чтобы не попасться на скамеров 🚫 Что и для чего спросить у потенциального работодателя? 1. Спроси сколько трафика на страничке и какие источники трафика. В среднем в сутки 30 бесплатных подписчиков

🥰8👍3👏3

15 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC918 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Первый день в адалте, с чего начать? Часть 2 Я считаю позицию секстера одной из лучших для начала. На мой взгляд каждый человек в сфере (кроме модели) должен знать английский на высоком уровне. Мое противное мнение, вы можете с ним не согласиться) А знание английского - это уже хорошие шансы на успех 🥳 Стартер пак для поиска работы секстером: 🔘уверенное знание английского, на хорошую анкету агентство не посадит че

🥰5👏3👍2

4 Jun 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Волна теневых банов на реддит и как их избежать 😐 Никогда не было и вот опять... прилетают теневые баны на реддит без видимых на то причин. Последняя волна была больше года назад, и за весь этот период теневые баны для нашей команды были крайней редкостью - иногда прилетали при поспешном запуске или после зачистки акка, но не больше 1 бана в месяц. За последние же два дня у нас улетело уже несколько аккаунтов, и сре

26 May 2026, 11:59 UTC≈2,250 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Новый кейс по ведению фансли 👀 Начали работу 15 апреля, на старте было 28.9к лайков и 5900 фолловеров. На данный момент - 35.6к лайков, 6008 фолловеров и 22 платных сабов. В декабре 2025 баланс составлял $486.20, а за последние 30 дней показатель достиг $3,381.79, что почти х7 по сравнению с декабрем. Стоит отметить, что балансы выросли при том, что ценовая политика у модели достаточно высокая и контента за 30-50$

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @fanslyfromcorgi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 267,614 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fansly заметки от Коржика” (@fanslyfromcorgi), 4,647 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanslyfromcorgi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.