看了孙割和景甜的瓜,我总结了一下: 张继科翻前fold,景甜、孙割Limp入池,翻牌景甜bet3000万人民币,孙割call住;转牌景甜暴力C bet5000万美金,孙割弃牌
❤2
Signed 比心

Channel
@fanka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,708subscribers
+3,274 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002401099481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fanka |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fanka |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 11,708 | +499 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 11,209 | +2,057 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 9,152 | +165 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 8,987 | +314 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 8,673 | +77 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 8,596 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 8,576 | +49 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 8,527 | +57 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 8,470 | +42 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 8,428 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 8,437 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 8,446 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 8,451 | +17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 8,434 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 68.8% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 29.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fanka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
看了孙割和景甜的瓜,我总结了一下: 张继科翻前fold,景甜、孙割Limp入池,翻牌景甜bet3000万人民币,孙割call住;转牌景甜暴力C bet5000万美金,孙割弃牌
❤2
Signed 比心
又是谁家车队底下的,🤦♂️
❤1
Signed 比心
今天是中元节,鬼门关大开,女孩子害怕的话,不要穿胸罩,寓意没有凶兆,不穿裤头寓意没有苦头,拍照发来我检查
❤1🔥1
Signed 比心
群用户名 @miss 已转移到老群 点不开的点 @kaifan
Signed 比心
您好,我是电影《猪来》的工作人员,偶然刷到您的朋友圈自拍觉得您很符合我们续作电影《猪来》的主角脸模,想问一下您有没有意愿进军影视圈。如有意愿请回复OK,没有意愿我这边盗一下您朋友圈自拍。
❤1
Signed 比心
终于有钱拉电子了… 6i.com
❤4👍1
Signed 比心
当保安也需要文化高啊
Signed 离乱
张老师,我是比心 当年我坐在教室的最后一排,成绩又差又调皮,很多老师都说我是送外卖的命 但你没有看不起我,你说我虽然调皮,但是机灵,这句话我记到现在 听说你儿子最近结婚要买房,明天直接去售楼部,会有人专门接待你
❤2
Signed 比心
来开个会 PS:大群申诉中 老群防迷失: @kaifan (开饭)
Signed 比心
@miss TG犯病了 大群现在正在申诉中 备用群 @kaifan
❤6
Signed 比心
新币旗下原「万邦海外」相关业务,现已正式全权移交至「皇冠担保」 图中所示群目前均已完成交接,后续相关业务将由皇冠担保全面承接并持续推进 熟悉的团队,熟悉的做事方式,始终不变的专业与效率 皇冠担保——你所熟悉的担保,还是那群你熟悉的人 皇冠公群 @hggq 皇冠24小时客服 @hgkf
❤2
Signed 比心
刚刚打自己号杀太多被封了 有没有人借个黄金号 我殴打一下黄金兄弟 可能有点暴力 会封几天
❤1
Signed 比心
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @fanka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比心日记 @fanka” (@fanka), 11,708 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.