https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/5423
❤1

Channel
@fangpian6688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,490subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001927269113 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fangpian6688 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fangpian6688 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 1,490 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 1,485 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 1,487 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:24 | 1,482 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 1,488 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1,489 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 1,491 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 1,496 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 1,490 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 1,485 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 1,481 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,482 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,482 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
69 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 65.2% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2024 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/5423
❤1
https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/5419?single
https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/5320
❤2
诈骗 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/5122?single
处女套路 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/4869
如果你不是一线城市,一个女的频道超过5000人,基本上都是诈骗。 (全网骗,每个地方都引流,所以才会这么多人,非一线城市真实的老师基本上很难有5000+粉丝) 女的频道发的图片,不是打炮,而是各处旅游打卡,各种美照,基本上都是诈骗(真的老师天天接单,回复信息都来不及,哪有空天天出去) 一个女的频道,天天有空,都没有姨妈休假的,基本上都是诈骗 诈骗 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/5122?single
❤6👍1
https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/3898
https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/3944
❤1
8183548774QQ 诈骗 @yingzijian 诈骗 https://t.me/yingzijiang 诈骗
♦别借钱给女的。 ❶如果你约之前借钱,你就约不到了。 她的目的就是要钱,你事先都给钱了,她的目的到达了,为什么还要约你? 她事先拿到钱,她就一直拖着,有时间就先约别人。 就算有时间不约别人,也不想约你,而是做其他事情。 ❷你约过一些女的,真实的。 事后她找你借钱,估计就是准备不做了,想捞一笔。
❤5
11防骗 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2854 12 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2877 13与你和丝瓜上被骗 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/3345?single 14全网诈骗 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/3380 15进群费,保证金,服务费 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/3679?single
诈骗案例 1仙人跳 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2829?single 2骗门槛 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2600 3会员费套路 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2839 4假资源,保证金 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2840 5假扮女号 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2842?single 6裸聊诈骗 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2843 7假资源+保证金 全网骗,手法高明,一般都骗几千,极度恶劣 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2844 8假资源+保证金 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2845 9假资源 https://t.me/fankuibaogao12/2848?single 10假扮女号,全网骗 …
❤5👍3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fangpian6688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“防骗套路分享” (@fangpian6688), 1,490 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fangpian6688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.