即刻很像之前的饭否 https://t.me/jike_daily https://t.me/jike_weekly
Channel
饭否每周精选
@fanfou_weekly
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
231subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001105489285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fanfou_weekly |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 5 February 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fanfou_weekly |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 231 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 230 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 230 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 February 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
"饭否每日精选,饭否每周精选,暂停更新。谢谢各位的关注。" 由于官方停更,本频道也无法再为饭友们提供服务,抱歉。 有兴趣的饭友可以加一下群。 https://t.me/fanfou_friends
Photo, posted without a caption
试问有谁不喜欢这种完美女孩儿?
便宜坊焖炉烤鸭最地道 东兴楼乌鱼蛋入口即消 醉琼林的五柳鱼滋味绝妙 致美斋的萝卜丝饼烩鸭条 灶温的烂肉面 木家寨的炒疙瘩 金家楼汤爆肚 同和居的烤馒头 都一处的烧麦炸三角 来今雨轩的肉沫火烧冬菜包儿 月盛斋酱羊肉 三妙堂的合碗酪 王致和的臭豆腐 杏花村的陈花雕
Photo, posted without a caption
上传了新照片
Photo, posted without a caption
大部分跟我一样庸俗的男人都是无比花心的,我们爱奔驰爱宝马又爱雷克萨斯,如果你问我们为什么不爱保时捷法拉利兰博基尼?我可以告诉你,因为我们庸俗归庸俗,心里还有点B数。
Photo, posted without a caption
来自知乎
推荐一家上海菜馆子。很小,很好吃 https://www.instagram.com/p...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fanfou_weekly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@fanfou_weekly named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“饭否每周精选” (@fanfou_weekly), 231 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanfou_weekly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.