Выложила новую главу на 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 https://ficbook.net/readfic/019791e6-658e-7ea1-8f5e-7829df6f19c3
❤15🥰3

Channel
@fanfikimoifanfiki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
769subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002002853458 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fanfikimoifanfiki |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fanfikimoifanfiki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:05 | 769 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:22 | 767 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 October 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,416 |
| Reactions total | 412 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
412 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 244 | 59.2% | |
| 🥰 | 44 | 10.7% | |
| 💔 | 41 | 9.95% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 8.25% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 7.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 3.40% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.728% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.243% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 412 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Выложила новую главу на 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 https://ficbook.net/readfic/019791e6-658e-7ea1-8f5e-7829df6f19c3
❤15🥰3
Выложила новую главу на ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ https://boosty.to/stormborn Следующая будет к "Общество". Я тут неплохо потрудилась над главами, сын исправно ходил в садик целый месяц! Но вот в субботу заболел, как раз перед первым своим утренником в садике 😭 Очень обидно, у него ещё и День Рождения в пятницу. Надеюсь, что хоть к пятнице выздоровеет, и спокойно поест торт
💔26
Ура, девочки, всех поздравляю! Чуть попозже напишу всем в личку, чтобы узнать адреса ваших Озонов ❤️
🎉18👍1
Posted without readable text
🎉16🔥5
В книге говорится, что он в этот момент так на всех смотрит потому, что впечатлен способностью Люси Грей располагать к себе. Впечатлён и насторожен, потому что: 1 - она должна принадлежать только ему вообще-то, а не толпе обожателей; 2 - сам Кориолан умело манипулировал мнением окружающих, и теперь увидел в ней угрозу. Вообще всем теперь советую почитать книгу, очень хорошо описаны его психопатические терзания ☕️
🔥20🥰4❤2
Выложила новую главу на 🎀🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🎀 https://ficbook.net/readfic/01a13958-4f88-7b83-b905-54999b209799
❤19
Выложила вторую главу на 🔮 🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸 🔮 https://boosty.to/stormborn
❤24
Выложила новую главу на ❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥 https://ficbook.net/readfic/01a13958-4f88-7b83-b905-54999b209799
❤23
Начала новую работу! Про Люси и Кориолана 💓 Ещё раз благодарю читательницу за заявку, я бы хотела внести вас в шапку работы на Фикбуке! Первая глава уже на 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 https://boosty.to/stormborn
❤29
Уже в поисках коробок для отправки! Надеюсь, что в первую неделю после розыгрыша все призы разошлю 💕 Напоминаю, что итоги будут подведены уже 1 ноября! Всем пришлю призы через Озон ✌️
🥰17❤2
👌Читаете разнофэндомных авторов?👌
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤12
Девочки, назрел такой вопрос... А вы часто читаете разнофэндомных авторов? Я тут наткнулась на обсуждение в сети, если кратко: люди редко читают авторов, что пишут по разным фд/разным пейрингам. В том же обсуждении много сетовали на авторов, что дропают одну крутую работу по фэндому, а потом никогда к нему больше не возвращаются и пишут о чем-то другом 😴 Я тут сразу вспомнила о том, что самая активная аудитория у м…
❤21💔6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fanfikimoifanfiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👌Читаете разнофэндомных авторов?👌
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШтормовойБорн” (@fanfikimoifanfiki), 769 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanfikimoifanfiki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.