Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Новости Динамо Брест

Channel

Новости Динамо Брест

@fan_dynamobrest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

221subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796694134
TypeChannel
Username@fan_dynamobrest
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/fan_dynamobrest

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2212292257 August 2026 — 227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 229 subscribers9 September 2026 — 227 subscribers18 September 2026 — 223 subscribers3 October 2026 — 221 subscribers7 August 20263 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 57 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 220–230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 09:16221-2
18 Sept 2026, 12:59223-4
9 Sept 2026, 22:36227-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:10229+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:18227no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:52227first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

332 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14744.3%
😢3510.5%
🤬3410.2%
👍298.73%
❤185.42%
🤡185.42%
🤔144.22%
💩113.31%
😱92.71%
😭51.51%
👏30.904%
🥱30.904%
👌20.602%
😁20.602%
🤮10.301%
🤯10.301%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 16:10 UTC535 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⚽️Автор первого гола в сезоне - Денис Ковалевич!

🔥14❤1

9 Apr 2026, 15:20 UTC462 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Шрамченко чуть не продлил традицию по пропущенным от бывших игроков, но Малащицкий выручает

3 Apr 2026, 17:53 UTC597 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗣️Александр Седнев подвел итоги после 4 поражения подряд и 0 забитых голов в 8 таймах: «Хороший и боевой матч. У меня нет претензии к своим футболистам, сделали все возможное. К сожалению, без забитых голов тяжело на что-то рассчитывать. Где-то невезение, где-то спешка. Мне показалось, что не хватило уверенности в том, что мы должны забить. В первом тайме очень много было подготовительной части, активных и агрессивн…

🤡18💩3🤔2🤬1

28 Mar 2026, 11:18 UTC559 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2️⃣:0️⃣ обыгрываем Волну после первого тайма. ⚽️Голами отличились Юзепчук и Корцов. Безголевая серия прервалась на 390 минуте.

👍12😁2

22 Mar 2026, 11:57 UTC677 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

8 таймов без голов если брать товарищеский матч со Строгино. И поражение Белшине 1:0 в первом круге. Без комментариев…

🤬25

22 Mar 2026, 10:54 UTC623 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Проигрываем 1:0 после первого тайма Белшине. Ненадолго задержится Александр Седнев судя по всему что происходит в команде. Свободный Виталий Жуковский главный претендент в случае ухода Александра Седнева?!

💩8👍7❤2

19 Feb 2026, 13:13 UTC800 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скоро еще будет официальное подписание вратаря Максима Белова. Всеволод Садовский все еще под вопросом.

🔥28

19 Feb 2026, 12:51 UTC665 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

👆

  1. 🌟2%
  2. 🌟 🌟5%
  3. 🌟 🌟 🌟26%
  4. 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟31%
  5. 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟37%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Feb 2026, 12:48 UTC617 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как оцените все подписания в это межсезонье?! Денис Левицкий ( Последний клуб - МЛ Витебск ) Максим Ковель ( Последний клуб - Жетысу ) Владислав Ложкин ( Последний клуб - Черноморец ) Александр Ломакин ( Последний клуб - Торпедо Москва ) Михаил Бондаренко ( Последний клуб - ФК Минск ) Макс Дзиов ( Последний клуб - Факел ) Денис Гречихо ( Последний клуб - Динамо Минск )

🔥15

30 Dec 2025, 14:20 UTC801 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😔Михаил Козакевич покинул брестское Динамо и близок к переходу в Динамо-Минск

😢18😭5😱3

29 Dec 2025, 13:27 UTC853 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚪️🔵🏆 Александр Зайцев тоже на месте

🔥20

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fan_dynamobrest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Feb 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll101 voters

👆

  1. 🌟2%
  2. 🌟 🌟5%
  3. 🌟 🌟 🌟26%
  4. 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟31%
  5. 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟37%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Nov 2025, 12:54 UTCAnonymous Poll152 voters

Как оцените прошедший сезон?!

  1. ⭐️9%
  2. ⭐️⭐️5%
  3. ⭐️⭐️⭐️53%
  4. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️23%
  5. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Новости Динамо Брест” (@fan_dynamobrest), 221 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fan_dynamobrest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.