3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 462–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:57
462
-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:03
463
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:34
463
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9
52.9%
👏
7
41.2%
❤
1
5.88%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2022 to 25 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام خدمت همراهان عزیز
به علت مشکل فنی که برای خانم امیری پیش آمده بود در این مدت قادر به فعالیت در این کانال نبودند در حال حاضر ایشان در کانال دیگری مشغول فعالیت هستند. برای استفاده از مطالب و محتوای جدید عضو کانال زیر شوید👇👇👇
@Falsafidaaaan
اصرار به قوی بودن همیشگی شما را نابود خواهد کرد!
هیچ اشکالی ندارد که گاهی غمگین باشید، گاهی عصبانی شوید، گاهی گریه کنید...
این که به شما میگویند احساسات خود را بروز ندهید و همیشه بگویید من خوب هستم من قوی هستم و هیچ اشکالی وجود ندارد، روانشناسی زرد است!
#روانشناسی_زندگی #روانشناسی_رابطه #روانشناسی_زرد#فلسفه#حالخوب #علم #علوم_انسانی #دروغ#احساسات #روابط_بین_فردی #فلسفه_برای_همه #فلسفه_ورزی
https://www.instagram.com…
یکی از بیشترین سوالاتی که از والدین میشنوم،در مدرسه ،کارگاه های خصوصی و حتی از دوستان و فامیل راجع به کتاب خواندن بچه هاس :
_خانم امیری چکار کنم بچه م کتاب خوان بشه ؟
_چکار کنم علاقمند بشه به کتاب ؟
_چکار کنم اولویت اولش به جای بازی کامپیوتری و تلویزیون ،کتاب باشه ؟
و من همیشه سوالشون رو با سوال جواب دادم 😁
_خودتون چقدر اهل مطالعه هستید ؟
_چقدر بچه ها شمارو در طول روز در حال کتاب خواندن دیدن ؟
_اولویت شما برای سرگر…
از گورخر پرسیدم :
تو حیوونی سیاهی
با چندتا خط سفید ،
یا حیوونی سفیدی
با چند تا خط سیاه ؟
🦓🦓🦓🦓🦓
اونم ازم سوال کرد :
تو همیشه،خوب هستی
گاهی میشه ،بد هستی ؟
یا همیشه ،بد هستی
گاهی میشه،خوب هستی ؟
🦓
تو همیشه،آرومی
گاهی میشه ،شلوغی
یا همیشه شلوغی
گاهی میشه ،آرومی ؟
🦓
تو همیشه،خوشحالی
گاهی میشه ،بدحالی
یا همیشه ،بدحالی
گاهی میشه ،خوشحالی ؟
🦓
تو همیشه،تمیزی
گاهی میشه،کثیفی
یا همیشه ،کثیفی
گاهی میشه ،تمیزی ؟
🦓
خلاصه گفت و …
یکی از هزاران موضوعی که هیچ وقت در مدرسه راجع بهش گفتگو نمیشه شهرته !
چون مدرسه وظیفه ش یکسان سازیه ،چه توقعیه ما داریم اصلا ؟!!
۱۶ سال رفتیم مدرسه و دانشگاه
از تولید مثلِ جُلبک تا حساب کردن سطح زیر فلان مُنحنی با انتگرال و بهمان خوندیم
ولی
یکی بهمون یاد نداد چطوری با سختیا کنار بیاییم
یکی بهمون یاد نداد چطوری آرامش داشته باشیم و به بقیه آرامش بدیم.
یکی بهمون یاد نداد چطوری خودمونو دوست داشته باشیم.
سر کلاس فبک(فلسفه…
.
هیچ استعدادی در هیچ جایی
از جهان به زور شکوفا نمیشود.
اجبار منجر به ایجاد اضطراب
در کودک و نوجوان میشود و اضطراب به
نوبه خود یکی از موانع خلاقیت است.
والدی نباشیم که کارهای نکرده ی خودمون ،
دوست داشتن و علاقه های خودمون ،برای همراه شدن با شوآف های مضحک جامعه که مثلا منم بچه م فلان کلاس میره و...(بقیه شو شما بگید )
به کودک و نوجوانمان تحمیل نکنیم که باید این کلاس رو بری و تازه منت هم سر بچه بگذاریم که من خیرت …
تو خانواده ی پدری من شنیدن دوستت دارم ،یه چیز تقریبا محاله ،مثلا پدرم جلوی ما بچه ها هیچ وقت به مادرم نگفت دوستت دارم ،به من و برادرخواهرم هم نگفت ،فقط با کارهایی مثل پوست گرفتن میوه برامون ،شوخی کردن باهامون و..نشون میداد .
به جز پدرم بقیه ی اقوام پدری هم اهل قربان صدقه رفتن و گفتن دوستت دارم نیستن ،یک بار عموی بزرگم بعد از یک گفتگوی مفصل که ربطی هم به بیان احساسات نداشت گفت عمو میدونی ما امیری ها اهل گفتن دوستت دا…
Signed Arezo Amiri
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @falsafidaaan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 434,526 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@falsafidaaan named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@amiri_p4c named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@erfuntah named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@hamedahangi named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@laurenzside named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فلسفیدن با فرزند” (@falsafidaaan), 462 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/falsafidaaan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.