Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝕱𝖆𝖑𝖍𝖆 π•―π–Šπ–’π–”π–ˆπ–—π–†π–™π–Žπ–ˆπ–† π•Έπ–Šπ–’π–Šπ–˜

@falhademocratica

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

969subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001939049984
TypeChannel
Username@falhademocratica
Created27 June 2023 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/falhademocratica

Growth

9699759727 August 2026 β€” 974 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 974 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 975 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 969 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 968–976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:46969-6
8 Aug 2026, 01:10975+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:46974no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:15974first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 13 September 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
12.5%
avg views Γ· 969 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.13%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held15 (13 September 2025 – 28 July 2026)
Views total121
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 32s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5045.9%
🀣1917.4%
πŸ’©76.42%
πŸ¦„76.42%
🀑65.50%
😈54.59%
🀬54.59%
🍌43.67%
πŸ’Š21.83%
⚑10.917%
✍10.917%
πŸ‘10.917%
πŸ’…10.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC121 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @orestauradorPhoto

Atualizadoβœ…

🀬5

29 May 2026, 17:01 UTC377 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoVideo

Lula diz que estÑ triste porque os EUA classificaram nossos criminosos como terroristas😭😭😭😭

🀑4

29 May 2026, 16:20 UTC352 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoVideo

"O pior de tudo Γ© que o preΓ§o da cocaΓ­na estΓ‘ subindo" PORRA

24 Apr 2026, 12:10 UTC551 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bom dia pessoal. Criei um grupo no zap pra falar sobre sobrevivencialismo e autossuficiencia. Acredito ser um tema muito mais importante que ficar compartilhando notΓ­cia de polΓ­tica no momento. Espero tambΓ©m se tornar um grupo menos tΓ³xico e mais produtivo Quem quiser entrar, bora aΓ­: https://chat.whatsapp.com/Km2pUOSqRz17PGHL8b9dBC

✍1

6 Apr 2026, 11:07 UTC567 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @orestauradorPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁5πŸ‘1

31 Mar 2026, 11:53 UTC568 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🍌2🀑2

31 Mar 2026, 11:51 UTC424 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoPhoto

Nem o diabo aguenta essa gente

🀣9

29 Mar 2026, 16:30 UTC403 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoPhoto

Achei que esses mastodontes fossem independentes empoderadas que nΓ£o precisassem de macho pra nada e que o cara que a recusa Γ© sΓ³ um viado cabaΓ§o liso

😁11

28 Mar 2026, 23:42 UTC330 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoVideo

JΓ‘ comeΓ§aram KKKKKKKKKK

🀣10

13 Mar 2026, 18:08 UTC464 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁5

11 Dec 2025, 19:03 UTC779 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @chad_BrPhoto

Antigamente isso era conhecido como viadagem.... Hoje Γ© "fronteira contra masculinidade frΓ‘gil"...

πŸ¦„7🍌2

2 Dec 2025, 12:32 UTC882 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccomandoPhoto

Como o prΓ³prio Cristo disse: uma casa dividida nΓ£o subsistirΓ‘.

⚑1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @falhademocratica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ•±π–†π–‘π–π–† π•―π–Šπ–’π–”π–ˆπ–—π–†π–™π–Žπ–ˆπ–† π•Έπ–Šπ–’π–Šπ–˜β€ (@falhademocratica), 969 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/falhademocratica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.