Channel
@fal_of_the_lleaf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001564952270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fal_of_the_lleaf |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 11 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fal_of_the_lleaf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 9 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 9 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 42.9% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2023 to 22 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️‼️ОЧЕНЬ ВАЖНО ‼️‼️ Администрация Шелби вновь уходит в отпуск. Вернёмся 5 августа к вам вновь ☺️💗 Союзы не разрываются, но следить админы за ними не будут. Все важные новости ждём в лс/ботах. Всех чмок ❤️ Вон они слева направо уже шлют фотки с отпуска: админ по нью Лукас, админ по союзам Дима, админ по нью Несса, админ по чату Настя, админ по креативу Алан и владелец Вишня 🫦 #Peaky_blinders_RP
Signed 👌
И так, что мы имеем? Снесенный канал, потому что кто-то обиделся хуй пойми на что. @vth_v — вот эта хуйня. Мой админ бывший по союзам. Он ушел с поста и нихуя мне не сказал об этом. У него было 2 акка, ибо с одного акка у него были на канале комментарии заблоканы. Поэтому у него было две админки. Сейчас я отлучился ненадолго, а он снес канал. Самое прикольное, что когда он уходил. Я потом чат прочел. Он говорил, что …
Signed 👌
намические укусили листопад
Signed 👌
кстати делаю новый союз лист, так что отпишитесь сн зу кому не сложно
Signed 👌
что ж, думаю все уже и так поняли, что я ничего с кф не делаю, но думаю пора бы начать. поэтому ищу нью и союзы ❤ #ƒℓєαƒ
Signed 👌
Мне пуфик, что синьорские закрылись, жду их открытия, а флорентия разорвали со всеми союз. Я их всё равно люблю, никто мне не помешает.🙄 Я люблю всех своих союзников, но увы впихнуть прям всех у меня не получится, а жаль... Те, кто есть в видео и не заметят, тем будет нечем дышать, ибо я сгрызуи нос к хренам отдам в рабство Рею или Экхарду.🥰 Люблю вас, солнышки.❤️ Cr: @Aresagon #literary_rp
Signed 👌
fall of the leaf #анкета #админ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Имя: | армин | Возраст: | 19 | Статус: | — | Юз: | @iluvusmm | ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💋1
Signed 👌
Video, posted without a caption
❤🔥2💋1😈1
Signed 👌
fall of the leaf #анкета #участник ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Имя: |Лу| Возраст: |25| Статус: |свободна| Юз: |@a2ker1| ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💋1
Signed 👌
fall of the leaf #анкета #админ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Имя: |Винстон| Возраст: |20| Статус: |свободен| Юз: | @wilka | ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Signed 👌
fall of the leaf #анкета #участник ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Имя: |Демиас| Возраст: |21| Статус: |занят| Юз: |@demi_night| ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Signed 👌
.・ᖴᗩᒪᒪ Oᖴ TᕼE ᒪEᗩᖴ⋆｡˚ ⋆ pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fal_of_the_lleaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,467,093 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fal_of_the_lleaf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.・ᖴᗩᒪᒪ Oᖴ TᕼE ᒪEᗩᖴ⋆｡˚ ⋆” (@fal_of_the_lleaf), 9 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fal_of_the_lleaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.