10 measurements spanning 26 days, net -176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,017–8,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 17:58
8,043
-16
31 Aug 2026, 03:26
8,059
-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:24
8,066
-63
24 Aug 2026, 20:46
8,129
-52
20 Aug 2026, 20:04
8,181
-1
18 Aug 2026, 03:12
8,182
-17
15 Aug 2026, 00:59
8,199
-18
11 Aug 2026, 13:34
8,217
+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:20
8,216
-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:30
8,219
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 8,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.714%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
28 (30 January 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
12,278
Reactions total
76
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38m 50s
Average length
3m 14s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
323 reactions across 27 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
194
60.1%
👍
58
18.0%
🔥
28
8.67%
🍌
26
8.05%
🥰
7
2.17%
🐳
4
1.24%
🤯
2
0.619%
❤🔥
1
0.31%
🌭
1
0.31%
💔
1
0.31%
🕊
1
0.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💦 Nega ayolda aloqaga nisbatan xohish kamayadi?
Ko‘pincha erkaklar bu holatni tushunmay, faqat “u meni istamayapti” deb o‘ylashadi. Aslida esa ayolning xohishini kamaytiradigan asosiy sabablar ko‘pincha erkakning o‘ziga bog‘liq bo‘ladi:
1️⃣ E’tibor yetishmasligi
Ayol faqat yaqinlik vaqtida emas, kun davomida ham mehr va iltifotni his qilishni xohlaydi. Sovuqqonlik va beparvolik uning istagini o‘ldiradi.
2️⃣ Bir xi…
#anonim_savol
Savol: Men erga tegganimga 1.5 yil boʻldi, biror marta ham orgazm his qilmadim.
Javob: Bu holat ko‘plab ayollarda uchraydi va turli sabablarga bog‘liq bo‘lishi mumkin. Orgazm his qilmaslik (anorgazmiya) psixologik, jismoniy yoki munosabat bilan bog‘liq omillarga qarab yuzaga keladi.
1. Ayollarda orgazm erkaklarnikidan farq qiladi
Ayollar jinsiy yaqinlikdan zavq olishlari va orgazm his qilishlari erk…
Jinsiy pozalar haqida maʼlumot berilgan yopiq kanallarimizga qabul ochildi.
1.Pozalar - aloqa texnikasi kanali - yuzlab pozalar, turli massajlar va foydali maslaxatlar kanali. Har kuni yangi pozalar va maslaxatlar berib boriladi.
Narxi: 30 ming soʻm
2. Ayolni tez orgazmga olib boruvchi pozalar kanali - ayolni tezroq orgazmga olib borish uchun moʻljallangan maxsus pozalar kanali.
Narxi: 20 ming soʻm
3. Ayollar uchu…
Faqat bugun!!!
Mana shu 5 ta EHTIROSLI kanallarning barchasiga obuna boʻlish narxini
105 ming emas 55 ming soʻm qilib beramiz
Qoʻshimchasiga 5000 ta EHTIROSLI VIDEOLAR kanalini ham BONUS qilib beramiz!
Faqat 7 kishi uchun bu aksiya amal qiladi!
Tezroq shoshiling. Hayotingizni ehtirosga toʻldiring!
Obuna boʻlish uchun @EHTIROS_ADMINKA1 ga “AKSIYA” deb yozib yuboring!
Ayollar uchun ogʻzaki jinsiy aloqa (minet) ning foydalari 🍌
Erkaklarda og'zaki jinsiy aloqa paytida ehtirosi kuchli qo'zg'aladi, ayrimlar ogʻzaki aloqa vaqtida sherik ustidan hokimiyatni his qilishni boshlaydi, ammo ayollar uchun ogʻzaki aloqadan nima foyda? Quyida bir nechta foydali jihatlarni keltirib oʻtamiz👇
🔻Minet - bu stressga qarshi ajoyib vosita;
🔻Tishlarni mustahkamlaydi;
🔻Terining holati yaxshilaydi;
🔻Yax…
«Ko‘zga koʻz tushsin» pozasi 💕
— Erkak bu pozada bemalol o‘tirishi va oyoqlarini oldinga cho‘zishi kerak boʻladi. 😎
— Ayol esa bu vaqtda eng goʻzal qirolicha holatida uning qarshisida tizzalarini bukkan holda asiraga aylanadi va oyoq-qo‘li bilan pastga tushadi.💋
— Ko‘zlar bir-biriga qadaladi va nafaslar bir xil uradi. Bu poza bir-biringizga ishonch va mehrni mustahkamlaydi. Har bir harakatdan zavqlaning va bir-bir…
👄 Nega erkak ayolning og‘ziga aloqa qilishni xohlaydi?
Ko‘pchilik ayollar bu savolni o‘ziga bergan. Aslida bunga bir nechta sabablar bor:
🔥 1. Kuchli vizual zavq – erkak uchun uning jinsiy a’zosi og‘izda bo‘lishi o‘ta hayajonli manzara. Bu kuchliroq ehtiros uyg‘otadi.
🔥 2. To‘liq hukmronlik hissi – og‘zaki aloqa vaqtida erkak o‘zini nazoratda sezadi, bu esa uning jinsiy energiyasini yanada kuchaytiradi.
🔥 3. Jins…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @fakt18plyus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Yaqinlik Sirlari | RASMIY @ehtiros_sirlari · 36,701 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lazzat sirlari 💋” (@fakt18plyus), 8,043 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fakt18plyus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
