Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fake IELTS

@fakeielts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,072subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373552746
TypeChannel
Username@fakeielts
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fakeielts

Growth

2,0692,0722,070.56 August 2026 — 2,071 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,071 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,069 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,072 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,069–2,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:142,072+3
7 Aug 2026, 01:502,069-2
6 Aug 2026, 12:322,071no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:242,071first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,953 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,05026.6%
💩99125.1%
👍87722.2%
😁2135.39%
❤‍🔥1543.90%
🔥1473.72%
1293.26%
🖕1082.73%
🤡731.85%
👎511.29%
😐390.987%
👏160.405%
😢140.354%
🤮140.354%
💯130.329%
🏆100.253%
🥴100.253%
80.202%
🐳60.152%
🤯50.126%
10 further kinds250.632%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,953reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2023 to 3 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2025, 17:20 UTC≈6,980 views142 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bu yerda xususiy maktab aybdormi yoki bu soxta sertifikatni o’quvchi yasab, maktabdagi o’qutuvchilar ham aldanib qolishganmi? Bunisi bizga qorong’u, lekin bu sertifikatni FAKE ligini payqay olmaslik uchun IELTS dan ancha uzoqda bo’lish kerak. Bu yasama sertifikat muhokama gruppaga tashlangani uchun original manbasidan forward qilindi.

🤣88💩22🔥228🍌2

3 Aug 2025, 17:17 UTC≈6,520 views182 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟢 Ассалому алекум Кадрли Устозлар ва азиз Ота-Оналар! ⚡ Ал-Хоразмий Мактаби 11-синф Укувчиси Махмуджонова Нодирабегим (IELTS)Сетификатини кулга критдилар ТАБРИКЛАЙМИЗ 🥳🥳🥳

🤣130💩26🤡13😁74👎1🔥1

8 Jul 2025, 10:29 UTC≈5,960 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mindless_writerPhoto

Sog' bo'lasizlar source: @examsuz @MINDLESS_WRITER

😁39😢14🤣62💯1🫡1

8 Jul 2025, 10:29 UTC≈5,610 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mindless_writerPhoto

⚠️ SCAMMER Hozirgi kunda ko‘pchilik Telegram kanallarda test javoblarini pulga taklif qilishyapti — ba’zilarida ochiq, ba’zilarida esa private guruh/kanallarda. 📆 Ko‘pchilikning xabari bor, 7-iyundan boshlab natijalar o‘rtacha 17–18 kunda chiqayapti. Bunga asosiy sabab — javoblarni sotuvchilar va sotib oluvchilar. Bu holat nafaqat natijalarning kechikishiga, balki test tizimining ishonchliligiga ham zarar yetkazm

17🔥6💯3❤‍🔥1

29 Oct 2024, 14:20 UTC≈16,400 views89 reactionsread 7 August 2026

“Samouchka” lardan ehtiyot bo’lorish kerak o’zi 😎 https://ddinstagram.com/reel/C_YnzsHvQ0A/?igsh=MWN5c2FyMXR0cHFmYg==

🤣73😁9👍41❤‍🔥1🍌1

25 Oct 2024, 18:00 UTC≈13,000 views245 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Eng yomoni kap-katta ustozlar o’z sertifikatlarini fake qildirib, davlatdan ustama puli olishi. Nima deb o’ylaysizlar, kanalga chiqaraylikmi shundaylarni yoki uyatga qo’ymagan maqulmi? Kim qanday fikrda?

❤‍🔥124👍67🔥29💯9😐94😱3

25 Oct 2024, 17:53 UTC≈12,400 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Barchaga savol: Kanalga qachon qo’shilgansiz? Yoki qo’shilmasdan kuzatadimi ko’pchilik?

👍67❤‍🔥86

24 Oct 2024, 11:23 UTC≈14,200 views150 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Long Read (Longrid) Aynan kimlar bu kanalda “qahramon” ga aylanadi? Bu kanalni vazifasi 100% tasdiqlangan FAKE sertifikatlarni fosh qilish. Kanalimizda chiqadigan qahramonlarimiz turli xil yoshdagi, turli xil kasbdagi insonlar. Ularni barchasini birlashtirib turadigan narsa bu IELTS sertifikatini soxtalashtirishidir. Kimdir o’zi uchun soxtalashtirsa, kimdir o’quvchilarni aldab ko’paytirish uchun qiladi. Asosan ikkin

🔥78👍35217🖕6❤‍🔥2👏1

22 Oct 2024, 11:49 UTC≈26,400 views426 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

O’quv markazlariga mazg’ava ag’dargandan ko’ra, haqiqiy bilim berish uchun izlanish kerak. Kelinglar, yuqoridagi videoni iloji boricha kengroq tarqatamiz, toki qahramonimiz oddiy xalqni chalg’itishni to’xtatib, foydaliroq ish bilan shug’ullansin.

💩264🤣103👍31🤮7👎63🎉3🔥3

22 Oct 2024, 11:38 UTC≈26,700 views354 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Shu bolani haqiqiy ballini tahmin qilib ko’rilarchi :) Hozir haqiqiy balli tashlanadi. Instagramda to’liq reel ni ko’rish va kommentariyalar qolidirsn uchun: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DA2XV3fNWP7/?igsh=MWVuaHdmemdhbG10cw==

🤣251💩58😁17👍15🖕6🤮4👎21

22 Oct 2024, 11:24 UTC≈15,300 views183 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔞🚫⛔️ “1.5 soatda Ingliz tilini grammatikasini to’liq o’rgatib qo’yaman” Quyida joylanadigan videoni ko’ngli bo’shlar ko’rmasin 😄

🤣144😁18👍85🐳3👌3🌭2

20 Jul 2024, 13:39 UTC≈36,200 views642 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Meet another faker with a fake IELTS certificate. He claimed to have an overall score of 8.5, with a 9 in speaking, but it turns out his actual scores are 7.5 overall and 8.0 in speaking. Please be more cautious before believing in some online teachers. P.S. His real name is Humoyun, not Mustafa as stated.

💩309👍153🤣48👎37🖕32🤡2216😐10

Signed Sardor Ergashev

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fakeielts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 990,016 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fake IELTS” (@fakeielts), 2,072 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fakeielts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.