Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

fakedonalds

@fakedonalds

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86,493subscribers

-529 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002135855757
TypeChannel
Username@fakedonalds
DescriptionЖурнал об экосистеме TON и не только chat: @fakedonaldsclub sbt channel: @sbtsearch drophunting: @friesdrops https://teletype.in/@fakedonalds admin: @scmbrgr #fakedonalds #sbt #drophunting
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fakedonalds

Growth

86,49387,02286,757.57 August 2026 — 87,022 subscribers7 August 2026 — 87,022 subscribers8 August 2026 — 86,985 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86,846 subscribers10 August 2026 — 86,707 subscribers11 August 2026 — 86,595 subscribers12 August 2026 — 86,493 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -529. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86,414–87,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:3586,493-102
11 Aug 2026, 06:0886,595-112
10 Aug 2026, 03:1486,707-139
9 Aug 2026, 03:5286,846-139
8 Aug 2026, 04:1686,985-37
7 Aug 2026, 13:0087,022no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:5487,022first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
611
Videos
45
Links
598

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤯4123.4%
🍓3821.7%
🍌3620.6%
🍾3318.9%
🌭2715.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 8 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
572
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
513
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fakedonalds. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 8 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 May 2026, 08:59 UTC741 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ещё один из наших общих друзей, запилил симпатичную игру с помощью splox.io Мне нравится графоний, сейчас бета, можно занять руки на все майские)

🤯2

8 May 2026, 08:59 UTC876 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @CandleRunnerGamesPhoto

Всем привет! Candle Runner уже можно нормально погонять в бете. Сейчас есть daily track, leaderboard, ghost-run и челленджи друзьям — можно пробежать, сохранить результат и кинуть кому-нибудь попытку побить твой забег. Дальше крутим механику: думаем над double jump, перками за монетки в духе roguelite и новыми ситуациями на треке, чтобы каждый ран был чуть другим. Пока баланс ещё сырой — залетайте, тестите, ломайте

🤯4🍌2🍓2🍾1

17 Apr 2026, 08:16 UTC977 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Скучали, мои хорошие? И я скучал Тверс запускает второй сезон, а бургер хочет попробовать вернуть назад свои влошенные шекели Будет клан. Будет бой. Вот наша рефка: https://t.me/TVerse?startapp=galaxy-0003e898d8000313000f0003c9ad8a Судя по тому как на карте выглядят галактики, второй сезон обещает быть более похожим на классическую мобильную стратегию. Допом добавили минт галактик за 7 TON, но сразу предупреждаю

🍌5🍓2🍾1

31 Jan 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,500 views12 reactions513 Starsread 12 August 2026

Рекламы в канале по прежнему нет и уже никогда не будет) 🔗 Main channel | SBT channel | Drophunting channel | Chat

🍾7🤯3🍌1🍓1

9 Jan 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,960 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Для тех кто восхитился магией Сплокс рефка бургера не нужна, для всех остальных: https://app.splox.io/login?ref=REFB7FFEED2

🍓5

8 Jan 2026, 23:39 UTC≈1,470 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Это не реклама, а реальная возможность для некоторых

🍓4🌭1🍌1

8 Jan 2026, 23:38 UTC≈1,350 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bo_logVideo

Ещё 5 лет назад сложно было представить, что мы так быстро дойдём до стадии, когда нейронки с нуля: 1. Покупают сервер 2. Пишут код 3. Деплоят и обслуживают его 2026 год — и это уже реальность. На видео: сначала создаём агента для создания телеграм-ботов, а потом созданный агент разворачивает на Digital Ocean полноценного ИИ-бота. Работает. 10 тысяч инструментов + процедурные знания = воспроизводимые результаты.

🍓3🍾2🤯2

31 Dec 2025, 20:55 UTC≈1,170 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

С Новым годом, мои хорошие! Подводить итоги не буду, в тоне и так всё понятно) Планов в количестве, как у картошки, у меня нет. Могу пообещать вам вернуться в тон и снова начать активно вести канал, но не хочу заканчивать этот пост враньем. Поэтому обещаю вам, что в новом году все будет происходить в нужное время и в нужном месте. Самое главное пожелание, это оставаться порядочными людьми в любой ситуации и газова

🌭16🍓4🍾3

17 Dec 2025, 15:14 UTC≈1,390 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Хотел снова проинвестировать в телеграм подарки, но купив подарок на др другу за тоны, почему то вынужден ждать неделю для того, чтобы его передать *upd не неделю, а почти три

🍌9🍓4🤯3🌭1

2 Dec 2025, 09:17 UTC≈1,920 views19 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Помните по 8?)

🤯11🌭6🍾2

27 Nov 2025, 18:25 UTC≈1,820 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А вот например любимый BroBot после провала с сбт на тон, не умер, а сменил название на QuestHub и был таков Механика та же, только вместо красивых и детализированных сбт будут стикеры подарки) В стартовом квесте* разыгрывают 50$ за первое место, при этом в соседнем квесте от Fiva, разыгрывают аж целую кекпку Дурова) * - аккуратнее там

🤯6🍓3🍾2

27 Nov 2025, 12:32 UTC≈1,380 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вот отличный чекер умерших проектов в Телеграм, а конкретно в экосистеме TON: https://t.me/TheOpenCemetery Во всех успели поучаствовать?)

🤯5🍾2🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fakedonalds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 797,152 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“fakedonalds” (@fakedonalds), 86,493 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fakedonalds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.