Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐵𝑜𝒹𝓎, 𝑒𝓋𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑒

Channel

𝐵𝑜𝒹𝓎, 𝑒𝓋𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑒

@fajr_ruq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,942subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001588062525
TypeChannel
Username@fajr_ruq
Created24 August 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fajr_ruq

Growth

1,9421,9551,948.510 August 2026 — 1,955 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,955 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,942 subscribers10 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,940–1,957 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:451,942-13
10 Aug 2026, 07:451,955no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:321,955first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 24 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

153 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52899950525027675414831.4%
custom 52381576576882544433522.9%
custom 62084996859303075022113.7%
custom 52584255009839177571610.5%
custom 5274252614383457227106.54%
custom 536156020706535843395.88%
custom 535978386013135372663.92%
custom 531702748646949407842.61%
custom 524041145466176218221.31%
custom 542916491644975972721.31%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2022 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2026, 07:06 UTC≈2,240 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Какой тип разбираем?💓

  1. 〽️Нормальная кожа14%
  2. 〽️Сухая кожа11%
  3. 〽️Жирная кожа33%
  4. 〽️Комбинированная кожа43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52742526143834572275custom 54291649164497597272custom 52404114546617621821custom 53170274864694940781

9 Mar 2026, 07:06 UTC≈2,110 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Определяем тип нашей кожи 👺 Это самая важная часть диагностики, без которой невозможно дальнейшее построение плана процедур для улучшения внешнего вида и лечения кожи, если оно необходимо. Всего их 4: нормальная, жирная, сухая, комбинированная. Для того, чтобы определить, к какому из них вы относитесь, мы будем обращать внимание на следующие элементы: состояние пор, наличие жирного блеска (выработка кожного сала ил

custom 53170274864694940783

3 Mar 2026, 19:14 UTC≈2,290 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вижу, что тема здоровья кожи откликнулась вам, так что начну с нее. ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐ Только что закончилось самое «высушивающее» время для нашей кожи лица – зима: мороз, ветер и отопление всегда оставляют на ней свой след, проявляющийся в сухости, шелушении, покраснениях, будь то даже жирная от природы кожа, что уж говорить о тех, кого природа «наградила» сухим

custom 525842550098391775716custom 52742526143834572275custom 52404114546617621821custom 62084996859303075021

18 Dec 2025, 18:08 UTC≈6,060 views49 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Разбираем:

  1. Метаболизм: как ускорить, действительно ли так зависит от генетики?17%
  2. Рост мышечной массы: виды мышечных волокон и как работать именно на их объем24%
  3. Здоровье кожи: акне, рубцы, жирный блеск или сухость30%
  4. Психическое благополучие: тревожность, бессонница, «дофаминовая яма», зависимости29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 523815765768825444326custom 53615602070653584339custom 62084996859303075027custom 53597838601313537265custom 52899950525027675412

18 Dec 2025, 18:06 UTC≈6,100 views69 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Приветствую дорогие💓 В данном канале вас ждут посты о том, как заботиться о своем здоровье и внешности с точки зрения будущего врача-эндокринолога На 6 курсе Сеченовского университета мне удалось набрать целый «багаж» знаний о физиологии старения, гормональной системы, а так же косметологии, так что вы будете получать проверенную, актуальную а главное структурированную информацию🌸 Учитывая прошлую тематику канала

custom 528999505250276754146custom 620849968593030750213custom 52381576576882544439custom 53597838601313537261

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @fajr_ruq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Mar 2026, 07:06 UTCAnonymous Poll214 voters

Какой тип разбираем?💓

  1. 〽️Нормальная кожа14%
  2. 〽️Сухая кожа11%
  3. 〽️Жирная кожа33%
  4. 〽️Комбинированная кожа43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Dec 2025, 18:08 UTCAnonymous Poll633 voters

Разбираем:

  1. Метаболизм: как ускорить, действительно ли так зависит от генетики?17%
  2. Рост мышечной массы: виды мышечных волокон и как работать именно на их объем24%
  3. Здоровье кожи: акне, рубцы, жирный блеск или сухость30%
  4. Психическое благополучие: тревожность, бессонница, «дофаминовая яма», зависимости29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2022 to 9 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,042,684 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐵𝑜𝒹𝓎, 𝑒𝓋𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑒” (@fajr_ruq), 1,942 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fajr_ruq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.