Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
3,380 average views per post against 2,122 subscribers — an engagement rate of 159.2%. Across the 7,760 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 5.40% and 22.3%, with a median of 11.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (16 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Posts measured
14 of 17 published in the window (5 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
47,287
Mature posts only
159.2% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,117–2,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 06:55
2,122
-14
11 Aug 2026, 12:52
2,136
-17
8 Aug 2026, 04:58
2,153
-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:47
2,155
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
159.2%
avg views ÷ 2,122 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,380
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.221%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (10 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
47,287
Reactions total
95
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
111 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
53.2%
👍
43
38.7%
😢
9
8.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الف الف مبروك ..
أبشركم اخيرا سوف يتزوج كريستيانو جورجينا وسوف يقام حفل زفاف ضخم يشارك فيه الأصدقاء
وسوف يكون من ضمن المشاركين اولادهم الاثنين .
بس في سوال محيرني :
ال ١٧ سنة التي كانوا مع بعض فيها وانجبوا أطفال فيها .. اش تسمى ؟
اش نوع العلاقة بينهم ؟
لا يروح بالكم بعيد .. صفوا النية مجرد سوال بريئ .
ماذا نقول لكل مسلم يشجع هذا اللاعب عن هذه الفترة ، وماذا نسميها ؟
هل نقول الإسلام تشدد وتطرف وتخلف ويراها علاقة…
• قال مكحول رحمه الله :
« الجنين في بطن أمه لا يطلب ، ولا يحزن ولا يغتم ، وإنما يأتيه رزقه في بطن أمه من دمها عبر المشيمه
فإذا وقع إلى الأرض استهل صرخ ، واستهلاله استنكار لمكانه الجديد، فإذا قطعت سرته حوّل الله رزقه إلى #ثديي_أمه حتى لا يطلب ولا يحزن ولا يغتم، ثم يصير طفلا يتناول الشيء بكفه فيأكله؛
فإذا هو بلغ ..
قال : أنّى لي بالرزق ؟ أي من أين لي؟ .
ويسيء الظن بربه ويظن أنه لن يرزقه ».
فيقول مكحول : « يا ويلك…
صلاة الفجر قد أزفت و أنغام الشيطان للكسالى بالشخير عزفت و بيوت المصلين بنور نباريسها عرفت وسبقوا الشمس بالتسبيح قبل شروقها و الناس قبل نشورها و الطير قبل غدوها فإنبعث النور من وجوهمم وإستقر الأمن في صدورهم إستفتحوا يومهم بتلبية النداء وإسترسلوا بالدعاء والحمد والثناء و وسن الناس و همهم الفضة و النحاس وهم آثروا الآخرة على السرير و النعاس فوليهم الله و رسوله عليه الصلاة و السلام
حقيقة يجب إدراكها :
مهما تعددت الأمنيات ، وتزاحمت الرغبات !!
تبقى العافية أعظم أمنية ، وأغلى نعمة ، يغفل عنها الكثير ولا يعرف قيمتها إلا من فقدها !!
قال عليه الصلاة والسلام :
" نعمتان مغبونٌ فيهما كثيرٌ من الناس الصحة والفراغ " .
وفي الحديث الصحيح " سلوا اللَّهَ العفوَ والعافيةَ فإنَّ أحدًا لم يُعطَ بعدَ اليقينِ خيرًا منَ العافيةِ " .
نسأل الله العفو والعافية ..
أشد الناس ندماً في الآخرة هم المهدِرون لأعمارهم حتى وإن دخلوا الجنة !!
بين الدرجة والدرجة في الجنة قراءة آية، وبينهما كذلك خمسمائة عام !!
يقول أحدهم :
رأيت صديقاً لا يوقف تحريك شفتيه ونحن جلوس نتكلم , لا يكاد يوقفهما عن التسبيح حتى انفضّ المجلس، فقمت وبي من الحسرة على نفسي ما الله به عليم !
الأنفاس الذاكرة تورث الغُرف العاطرة ، ومهمل الحسنات يُحرم عالي الدرجات ..
الأعمار تُحسب بالأنفاس ، والجنة غراسها ذكر لا يتعدى طر…
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @faith19977. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 275,249 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📖 نَفَحَاتٌ إِيمَانِيَّة 📖” (@faith19977), 2,122 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faith19977.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
