Посмотрела перформанс Насти Ливадновой «Будь готова быть одна». Претензия примерно такого уровня. Показалось?)
custom 53709244941960563574custom 52358248118416921312custom 54271866416283198262

Channel
@factory_church
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,098subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001240408085 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @factory_church |
| Created | 5 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/factory_church |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 1,098 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,097 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 1,095 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 1,095 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (12 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,949 |
| Reactions total | 117 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
235 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5370924494196056357 | 94 | 40.0% | |
| custom 5440845921824823755 | 54 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5235824811841692131 | 50 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5224179287191466913 | 25 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5427186641628319826 | 12 | 5.11% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @factory_church. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Посмотрела перформанс Насти Ливадновой «Будь готова быть одна». Претензия примерно такого уровня. Показалось?)
custom 53709244941960563574custom 52358248118416921312custom 54271866416283198262
Очень понравилась выставка «Дом 21. В гостях у художников» в центе «Зотов». Она посвящена обитателям легендарного доходного дома на Мясницкой 21, где в 1920-30е жили преподаватели ВХУТЕМАСа. Бытовой аспект расширяет контекст создания работ и позволяет по-новому взглянуть на знакомых авторов. В центре внимания Александр Родченко и Варвара Степанова, Александр Древин и Надежда Удальцова, Петр Митурич и Вера Хлебникова,…
custom 537092449419605635711custom 52358248118416921316custom 54408459218248237554custom 54271866416283198261
Сегодня первый день моего небольшого отпуска. Не люблю это слово. Кабаков очень точно описал его специфику: «Отпуск. В самом слове заключено что-то бюрократическое и унизительное: в одном ряду с ним — допуск, пропуск, выпуск. Кому-то что-то разрешают, с большим трудом, нехотя, утверждая где-то наверху, непременно где-то занося, фиксируя. Отпускание на время, с непременным скорым возвращением обратно». Он также пиш…
custom 537092449419605635712custom 52358248118416921319custom 54408459218248237554custom 54271866416283198262custom 52241792871914669131
Любопытно, что позиции Азулай и Галкина неожиданно сходятся в тексте Павла Отдельнова. Он тоже рассматривает архив как политическое пространство, в фокусе его внимания оказывается то, что я бы назвала проблемой «мерцающего доступа». Исторические документы то появляются, то исчезают из публичного пространства (засекречиваются). Отдельнов использует метафору айсберга, чтобы продемонстрировать, какая часть знания нам д…
custom 52241792871914669133custom 54271866416283198263custom 52358248118416921311custom 53709244941960563571custom 54408459218248237551
Прочитала номер «ХЖ» про архив. Конспектирую тут свои выводы, основанные на текстах, созвучных моей точке зрения. Людмила Воропай напоминает этимологию слова архив, происходящего от греческого «ἀρχή» и сочетающего в себе такие значения как «начало» и «власть». Архив не только сохраняет, но и исключает. «В будущее возьмут не всех» Кабакова. Поэтому архив — не нейтральное хранилище прошлого, но пространство, где прои…
custom 53709244941960563578custom 52358248118416921314custom 54408459218248237552custom 52241792871914669131custom 54271866416283198261
В Русском музее сейчас большая выставка Петра Кончаловского, приуроченная к 150-летию художника. В экспозиции около 170 живописных и графических работ всех периодов творчества мастера из музейных и частных коллекций. Жаль, что развеска осуществлена по набившему оскомину жанрово-тематическому принципу. А тексты, что на сайте, что в музее, написаны исполненным пафоса языком советской школы искусствознания: «оковы форм…
custom 537092449419605635711custom 52358248118416921314custom 54408459218248237553custom 52241792871914669131
Успела на эрмитажную выставку «Вселенная в миниатюре. Графика «малых мастеров»». Как всегда восторг! Малыми мастерами называют группу немецких художников — братьев Бартеля и Зебальда Бехама, Георга Пенца, Генриха Альдегревера. Свое название они получили из-за размеров создаваемых ими эстампов, зачастую не превышавших величину почтовой марки. «Эстетика малого объекта» соответствовала интенциям нового типа собирателей…
custom 53709244941960563578custom 54271866416283198263custom 54408459218248237553custom 52358248118416921311
Неожиданно для себя заинтересовалась работами Николы Овчинникова, представленными сейчас в открытом хранении «Гаража». Особенно теми, на которых изображен ямщицкий колокольчик, тот самый «дар Валдая». С одной стороны, понятно, что это часть «русского кода», элементы которого, зачастую иронически, осмысляются художником. С другой, моей первой мыслью при взгляде на эту графику была мысль о «времени колокольчиков» — ме…
custom 537092449419605635710custom 52358248118416921314custom 54408459218248237554
Отдельно хочется упомянуть работы второй жены и ученицы Штеренберга — Марии Гранавцевой. Они поженились в 1930-м и их картины этого периода очень похожи. Обычно говорят о том, как Штеренберг влиял на Гранавцеву, но хочется верить, что речь скорее о выработке семейного живописного языка. Который возник в результате совместной работы и ежедневного обсуждения искусства. P.S. После смерти Штеренберга Гранавцева попала …
custom 537092449419605635714custom 52358248118416921315custom 52241792871914669133custom 54408459218248237553
В Городке художников на Масловке идет выставка «Полеты над временем», посвященная семье Штеренбергов. Я — поклонник Давида Петровича, основателя династии. Вернувшись из эмиграции после революции, он стал институциональным лидером, одной из ключевых фигур авангарда, но со сменой художественной политики (переходом к соцреализму) оказался пережитком той системы, которую сам же и создал. До войны его называли формалисто…
custom 537092449419605635712custom 52358248118416921316custom 54408459218248237554
До сих пор прихожу в себя после открытия новой итерации. Очень трудно работать на вернисажах. После них я не могу избавиться от ощущения, будто сделала что-то плохое. Думаю, все дело в том, что на любом открытии искусство становится фоном для разыгрывания социального спектакля, в котором сотрудник музея/галереи превращается в конферансье. Его задача в такой ситуации — не столько говорить об искусстве, сколько развле…
custom 544084592182482375518custom 522417928719146691316custom 52358248118416921315
Пара слов) Первая итерация «Тающего дневника» подходит к концу. Так что, как говорится, спешите видеть! А завтра можно будет попасть на встречу с Колей.
custom 54408459218248237558custom 52358248118416921313custom 53709244941960563573
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @factory_church. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 145,541 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заводская церковь” (@factory_church), 1,098 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factory_church.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.