Channel
@factorsmile
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,670subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001613486315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @factorsmile |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/factorsmile |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 1,670 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 1,679 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1,688 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 1,696 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 1,700 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 1,711 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 1,712 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 1,714 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 1,722 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,733 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 1,744 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1,745 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 27.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 18.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 14.0% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5354853946345164866 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.65% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💙 Такой чудесный отзыв мы получили от нашей маленькой пациентки в клинике «Фактор Улыбки» на Будапештской! Спасибо за искренние слова и доверие! Особенно приятно получать такие отзывы от наших юных пациентов. ✨ Мы знаем, что поход к стоматологу может вызывать волнение, поэтому для нас особенно важно не только качественно провести лечение, но и поддержать ребёнка на каждом этапе: познакомиться, всё спокойно объяснит…
❤3👍1🔥1
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Заметили на зубе тонкую линию, похожую на царапину? Не спешите паниковать: трещины на эмали встречаются часто и не всегда требуют лечения. Однако даже небольшой дефект может оказаться глубже, чем кажется. В нашей новой статье рассказываем, почему появляются трещины, какие симптомы должны насторожить, чем опасны глубокие повреждения и как стоматолог может укрепить и защитить зуб. 📍 https://dzen.ru/a/anN_lt4lq1hp3oU
👍2custom 53548539463451648661
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Mary (@Dahanaga) 2. Аля (@aleff_14) 3. Алексей (@am_sunshine) Свяжемся с победителями завтра❤️ ✔️Проверить результаты
❤4🔥2
Зубы болели во все времена. Просто стоматологии выглядели немного иначе… Мы представили, какой могла бы быть клиника «Фактор Улыбки» в разные эпохи: - пещерный кабинет с видом на мамонтов; - стоматология Древнего Египта; - средневековая зубная мастерская; - клиника имперского Петербурга; - советская стоматология эпохи космоса; - и «Фактор Улыбки» на орбите в 2300 году. Эпохи меняются, технологии развиваются, а жела…
❤🔥4🔥2🤩2😁2custom 53548539463451648661
«Фактор Улыбки» Стоматология Спб pinned a photo
Сколько раз вы окладывали запись к ортодонту? В августе мы проводим «Дни красивой улыбки», где вы сможете бесплатно пройти цифровое сканирование, получить консультацию ортодонта, разобраться, что подойдет именно вам - брекеты или элайнеры, а также воспользоваться специальными предложениями! Все подробности - в карусели⬆️ 💜Поставьте «+» в комментариях, и мы оперативно свяжемся с вами, ответим на ваши вопросы и запи…
🤩4👍2
Добро пожаловать в нашу клинику на Варшавской 🤍 Проведём для вас небольшую экскурсию по пространству, в котором всё продумано для вашего комфорта: уютная зона ожидания, внимательные администраторы, возможность подобрать домашний уход и современные кабинеты для проведения полного комплекса стоматологических процедур. Здесь можно пройти весь путь - от диагностики и профилактики до комплексного лечения и восстановлени…
❤5❤🔥3🔥3👍1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @factorsmile. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Фактор Улыбки» Стоматология Спб” (@factorsmile), 1,670 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factorsmile.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.