Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FACTOR TV

Channel

FACTOR TV

@factoram

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,705subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330176510
TypeChannel
Username@factoram
DescriptionИнформационное агентство «Фактор» Factor.am- будет ежедневно предоставлять объективную информацию для своих читателей. https://factor.am Facebook` https://www.facebook.com/factor.am Twitter` https://twitter.com/factorarmenia YouTube` https://clck.ru/Dcdc5
Created19 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/factoram

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RadarARM/788058 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC@factoram/72788 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC1.007 minutes
@RadarARM/7888611 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC@factoram/72836 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@RadarARM/7892812 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC@factoram/72882 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC1.002 minutes
@RadarARM/7906618 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC@factoram/72998 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC1.003 minutes
@RadarARM/7908118 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC@factoram/73019 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC1.001.6 hours
@RadarARM/7938625 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC@factoram/73196 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC1.0082 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@RadarARM8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutes@RadarARM (8–0)
@araranews7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutes@araranews (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 15 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 216 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,64213,75113,696.57 August 2026 — 13,670 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,670 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,667 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,671 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,668 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,680 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,677 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,673 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,664 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,660 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,659 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,662 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,656 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,665 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,678 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,694 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,697 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,698 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,690 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,693 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,695 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,694 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,690 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,681 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,697 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,694 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,690 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,687 subscribers2 October 2026 — 13,685 subscribers7 October 2026 — 13,684 subscribers11 October 2026 — 13,673 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,656 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,649 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,650 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,647 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,650 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,651 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,645 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,650 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,642 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,646 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,650 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,751 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,739 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,735 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,736 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,741 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,736 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,739 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,735 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,733 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,735 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,743 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,738 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,730 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,734 subscribers10 November 2026 — 13,715 subscribers12 November 2026 — 13,705 subscribers13,7057 August 202612 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 97 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,626–13,767 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 16:5113,705-10
10 Nov 2026, 13:4013,715-19
9 Nov 2026, 01:5913,734+4
7 Nov 2026, 21:2113,730-8
6 Nov 2026, 15:5713,738-5
5 Nov 2026, 12:4613,743+8
4 Nov 2026, 09:1913,735+2
3 Nov 2026, 11:0913,733-2
2 Nov 2026, 14:1513,735-4
1 Nov 2026, 11:1613,739+3
31 Oct 2026, 09:5013,736-5
30 Oct 2026, 12:0613,741+5
29 Oct 2026, 13:4113,736+1
28 Oct 2026, 13:0813,735-4
27 Oct 2026, 11:5013,739-12
26 Oct 2026, 08:5613,751+101
25 Oct 2026, 09:4413,650+4
24 Oct 2026, 11:3013,646+4
23 Oct 2026, 08:0613,642-8
22 Oct 2026, 11:3913,650first reading

Engagement

736 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.58%
avg views ÷ 13,705 subscribers
Avg views / post
901
255 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
255
of 736 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 246 of 255 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held736 (7 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total229,800
Reactions total2,647
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈41,400
Videos
≈8,090
Links
≈54,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 09m
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 242 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,065 reactions across 710 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,41542.3%
🤣1,68420.9%
🤬1,28315.9%
❤97612.1%
👎5546.87%
😢790.98%
😱670.831%
💔70.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 711 of the 736 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 736 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 33 of 255 posts held from the last 30 days (12.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 05:35 UTC624 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Եթե Սերժ Սարգսյանը կա ընդդիմության համախմբման մեջ, ուրեմն՝ ձախողվելու է այն․ ո՞նց է հանգիստ տանը նստած, փեսան չի հետապնդվում․ Լիլիթ Դալլաքյան

❤4

13 Nov 2026, 05:30 UTC663 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Առավոտյան ժամը 06:30-ի սահմաններում թիվ 22 երթուղին սպասարկող հանրային տրանսպորտի վարորդը հավաքակայանից վերջնակետ գնալու ճանապարհին մահացել է։ ▫️Ըստ ժամանած Շտապօգնության ծառայության բժիշկների նախնական գնահատականի` վարորդը մահացել է, այնուհետև վթարի ենթարկվել։ «Երևանի ավտոբուս» ՓԲԸ

😢1

13 Nov 2026, 04:59 UTC707 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Կասկած չկա՝ ՀՀ-ն պիտի լքի ՀԱՊԿ-ն և ԵՏՄ-ն, բայց ինչո՞ւ ենք Պուտինին քարտ տալիս, որ մեզ ասի՝ հանրաքվե արեք․ Լիլիթ Դալլաքյան

❤5🤬2🤣1

13 Nov 2026, 04:46 UTC681 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Սամվել Կարապետյանը ՌԴ-ի երաշխիքը ո՞նց է բերելու, որ Սյունիքում ՖՍԲ-ին տարածք տրվի, ՀՀ ինքնիշխանությունը չտարածվի՞, ուղիղ ասեք․ Յուրի Ավագյան

👍3

12 Nov 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,000 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Ինչպես են ընտրվում TOON EXPO-ին մասնակից ընկերությունները

👍3

12 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,030 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🔴 Համացանցում տարածվող կառուցապատման նախագիծը քաղաքապետարանում չի քննարկվել և չի հաստատվել․ Ջուլիետա Ազարյան 🏗 Երևանի քաղաքապետի խոսնակ Ջուլիետա Ազարյանն անդրադարձել է վերջին օրերին համացանցում տարածվող կառուցապատման նախագծի տեսանյութերին։ 📌 Նրա խոսքով՝ տեսանյութերում ներկայացված նախագիծը երբևէ չի ներկայացվել Երևանի քաղաքապետարան և չի եղել քննարկման կամ համաձայնեցման առարկա։ 💬 «Տեսանյութերում ներկայացված նախագծայի…

🤣2❤1

12 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC852 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

8 անշարժ գույք, Maybach և միլիոններ․ ինչ են ուզում բռնագանձել Արթուր Բաղդասարյանից. ՏԵՍԱՆՅՈՒԹ

❤9👍4

12 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC816 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

ՌԴ-ն կգնա ՀՀ-ի դեմ առճակատման․ ՀԱՊԿ-ում ձայնից զրկելուն պետք է լուրջ մոտենալ․ Յուրի Ավագյան. ՏԵՍԱՆՅՈՒԹ https://factor.am/1080360.html

12 Nov 2026, 17:30 UTC801 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

ՌԴ-ն զրկեց ՀՀ-ին՝ ՀԱՊԿ-ում ձայնից, բայց չհեռացրեց․ ավելի շուտ ԵՏՄ-ից կհանեն՝ մեզ վնասելու նպատակով․ Լիլիթ Դալլաքյան․ ՏԵՍԱՆՅՈՒԹ

👍4❤1

12 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC778 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Ալիևի մամուլի ծառայությունը հրապարակել է Փաշինյանի հետ հանդիպման կադրերը։

👍9🤬2🤣1

12 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC733 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

📌Դուբլինում՝ Եվրոպական քաղաքական համայնքի գագաթնաժողովի շրջանակներում Հայաստանի ԱԳՄԱ նախարար Արարատ Միրզոյանը և Ադրբեջանի ԱԳ նախարար Ջեյհուն Բայրամովը կարճատև զրույց են ունեցել:

👍9🤬3🤣1

12 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC800 views16 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🇦🇲🇦🇿 Փաշինյանն ու Ալիևը Դուբլինում քննարկել են TRIPP-ը, սահմանազատումն ու տնտեսական կապերի զարգացումը 📍 Նոյեմբերի 12-ին Դուբլինում՝ Եվրոպական քաղաքական համայնքի 9-րդ գագաթնաժողովի շրջանակում, տեղի է ունեցել Նիկոլ Փաշինյանի և Իլհամ Ալիևի հանդիպումը։ 🤝 Կողմերը քննարկել են խաղաղության գործընթացի առաջմղմանն ուղղված գործնական քայլերը։ 🔹 Հանդիպման հիմնական թեմաները՝ 🚆 TRIPP – երկաթուղային և ավտոճանապարհային բաղադրիչներ…

❤9👍4🤬3

Showing the 12 most recent of 736 posts we hold for @factoram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@factoram edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Iravaban.net
@iravabannet1 · 26,638
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Լուրեր
@LurerH1 · 67,143
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
RADIO AURORA
@auroramedia · 31,089
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
SHAMSHYAN.com
@shamshyan_com · 35,180
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
Azatutyun
@azatutyuntv · 48,334
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
🇦🇲 Davit Grigoryan Live
@Davit_Grigoryan_Live · 22,079
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Առաջին զանգ
@ArchZang · 56,295
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
NEWS.am
@newsamarm · 23,355
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Infocom
@infocomm · 19,955
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
Сплетницы 🤫 Բամբասողներ
@BambasanqGirls · 63,760
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Սուրեն Սուրենյանց/ Suren Surenyants
@SurSurenyants · 24,554
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Radar Armenia
@RadarARM · 77,791
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
HAYELI.AM
@hayeliakumb · 26,217
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Red Ararat Media
@RedAraratMedia · 33,677
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Vardan Ghukasyan Վարդան Ղուկասյան
@VardanGukasyan · 155,419
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Инфотека24
@infoteka24 · 29,461
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FACTOR TV” (@factoram), 13,705 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factoram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.