Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Faces of TON

Channel

Faces of TON

@facesofton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,583subscribers

-400 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727756395
TypeChannel
Username@facesofton
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/facesofton

Growth

19,58319,98319,7836 August 2026 — 19,983 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,983 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,967 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,927 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,894 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,865 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,831 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,764 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,752 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,727 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,659 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,616 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,583 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 12 days, net -400. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,523–20,043 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 12:3519,583-33
17 Aug 2026, 13:1419,616-43
16 Aug 2026, 08:3619,659-68
14 Aug 2026, 20:2819,727-25
13 Aug 2026, 09:0519,752-12
12 Aug 2026, 12:1519,764-37
11 Aug 2026, 13:4219,801-30
10 Aug 2026, 14:5119,831-34
9 Aug 2026, 15:1719,865-29
8 Aug 2026, 15:4119,894-33
7 Aug 2026, 17:0019,927-40
6 Aug 2026, 13:5119,967-16
6 Aug 2026, 02:3019,983no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2219,983first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

975 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁44345.4%
🤣31031.8%
🔥12612.9%
😱626.36%
191.95%
🤔141.44%
🙏10.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 975reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2025 to 24 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 May 2025, 19:40 UTC≈1,940 views82 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚡️«Разбудите меня через 100 лет и спросите, что сейчас происходит в криптотелеге. И я отвечу – TON по 3 и подарки еб*ные» (с) Лев Толстой

😁49🤣17🔥8😱52🤔1

25 Mar 2025, 13:37 UTC≈4,490 views58 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«В тоне ничего интересного не происходит, вот, держите, поностальгировать» Админы криптоканалов начали постить новости из 2019 ввиду отсутствия актуальных

😁23🤣22🔥10😱2🤔1

23 Mar 2025, 14:43 UTC≈4,160 views67 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«Если вы видите такого человека у себя в личке – гоните его! Насмехайтесь над ним! И не верьте ни единому слову» – George Kov (настоящий)

😁35🤣198😱5

19 Mar 2025, 16:28 UTC≈4,350 views85 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Идейный кризис в мини-аппках: проекты на TON начали создавать приложения без контента. Админы каналов отреагировали постами без текста @facesofton

😁38🤣32🔥8😱7

10 Mar 2025, 14:48 UTC≈3,630 views94 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«Чё с постом, я $3 писал» После последнего обновления Telegram начал приукрашивать курс TON в рекламных постах крипто-каналов @facesofton

😁48🤣31🤔10🔥5

24 Feb 2025, 12:58 UTC≈3,840 views61 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«А у всех подарки новые отображаются? Не понимаю, почему-то показывает, что не всё выкуплено ещё. Может, глюк какой-то? Странно» Павел Дуров никак не может понять, почему никто не покупает подарки @facesofton

😁32🤣16🔥10🤔2😱1

18 Feb 2025, 08:36 UTC≈4,190 views66 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚡️«ФАКИН ФАК МАЗАФАКА ХАУ ДИД ЗИС ХЭППЕН» Президент Эритреи, обменявший страну на два золотых пепе в январе, в свойственной политику высокого уровня манере высказался насчет текущего флора NFT-подарков и потребовал отменить сделку. Тем временем, новый владелец уже успел проиграть государство в казино. Ведется следствие @facesofton

😁30🤣19🔥10😱52

14 Feb 2025, 11:37 UTC≈11,500 views117 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Принесли валентинки для твоей крипто-половинки. Разбирай, пока горячие @facesofton

😁49🔥30🤣267😱5

14 Feb 2025, 07:55 UTC≈3,580 views101 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«Почему я хвастаюсь дорогими подарками? Потому что вы влюблены друг в друга, а я влюблен в деньги» Павел Дуров в честь Дня Святого Валентина объяснил свою бизнес-модель на 2025 год

😁47🤣39🔥12😱3

6 Feb 2025, 17:08 UTC≈3,550 views105 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

⚡️«Разговор прошел не очень удачно» После встречи с Мануэлем Штотцом президент Трамп объявил о введении 100% пошлин на все товары из экосистемы TON @facesofton

🤣47😁37🔥16😱5

3 Feb 2025, 08:57 UTC≈3,600 views100 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚡️«Ваша безопасность для нас превыше всего» Tonkeeper заявил о введении KYC. Пользователи из СНГ сообщают, что не могут его пройти

😁49🤣26🔥17😱7🙏1

3 Feb 2025, 07:34 UTC≈3,260 views39 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«Да в казик я закинул! Ну че вы в самом деле, как будто первый раз такое видите! Погодите чутка, щас отыграюсь и всё верну. У нас на американском рынке все так делают» Мануэль Штотц — о текущем курсе TON

😱17🤣16😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @facesofton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 797,523 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Lozovsky.ton
@georgelozovsky · 110,816
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Faces of TON” (@facesofton), 19,583 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/facesofton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.