DEVILS APPS 2.0: ЧТО ИЗМЕНИЛОСЬ В СЕРВИСЕ ДЛЯ БАЙЕРОВ? 📲 📌Главные обновления: ⚪Новый подход к клоаке: многоуровневая защита приложений, которая помогла увеличить срок их жизни на 80%. ⚪️Мониторинг аномалий трафика: наши специалисты отслеживают просадки и помогают быстрее выявлять проблемы. ⚪️Собственная атрибуция: больше контроля над передачей данных и меньше потерь трафика. ⚪️Макросы: передача необходимых данны…

Channel
ФЕЙСБУКович
@facebookovich
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,059subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001627131846 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @facebookovich |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/facebookovich |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 10,059 | +8 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 10,051 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 10,055 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 10,056 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 10,062 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 10,067 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 10,068 | +8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 10,060 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 10,057 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 10,062 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 10,066 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 10,077 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:49 | 10,083 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 10,089 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 10,084 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 10,082 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 10,074 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 10,080 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 10,085 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 10,084 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
698 reactions across 42 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 383 | 54.9% | |
| ❤ | 148 | 21.2% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 6.16% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 5.30% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 4.30% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 3.58% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 1.58% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 1.15% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.573% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.287% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.287% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.143% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.143% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 698 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @facebookovich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Что у вас, как обстановка? Пробовал запускать, успехом не увенчалось, выживает очень мало кабов и при этом не крутят) Все-таки до конца месяца уверенно можно отойти от заливов, сконцентрируюсь сейчас на подготовке к след месяцу, соберу все воронки, закажу новые кабы, бмы и будем залетать в сентябрь 📱 Подписаться | Чат
🔥3❤1
#Рекомендасьен Мы команда Fbshopi🥩 всегда шли вперёд. 😎 [Shopi3.store] — это не просто магазин: — Это база для арбитражников (Фб, Гугл, Тик-ток, Твитер и многое другое) — Это быстрая система выдачи заказов — Это скидки и поддержка 24/7 🎁 Даем каждому попробовать со скидкой — -16% на всё по промокоду: fbshopi16 На сайте: ✅ Удобнее покупки с телефона ✅ Новые функции ✅ Большей выбор позиций в одном месте ✅ Пополнения…
❤1
спасибо дура провокация окончена 📱 Подписаться | Чат
🔥14❤6😱3😁2😍1
ну сладость же 😘🥰 сучка провоцирует меня 📱 Подписаться | Чат
😁19😍2
Месяц ебки всего подряд продолжается) Сегодня улетели даже пикселя, ну и бонусом фп и чуть кабов, думал залью побольше, дам чуть газ - не получилось, не фартануло Даже показать вам глобально нечего Я так понимаю у многих такая ситуация сейчас? 📱 Подписаться | Чат
👍8❤3
Вижу что очень многие сейчас работают со своей расходкой, без агентов В целом логика в этом есть, возьмем в учет что есть разные агенты - с платными кабами, есть такие где у тебя должны быть свои фармы, фп, пикслеля, а они тебе выдают только рк, тут как попадешь А когда все свое - моментами чуть запарнее, но то что сильно ощущается на обьеме - дешевле и стабильнее, ты сам все контролируешь, если сделать все качест…
❤7🔥3🥰1😁1
На рынке есть большая проблема с сервисами по Прилам или PWA Их стало много, но реально классных и хороших решений к сожалению очень мало В основном у нас был трабл либо по конверту, либо по качеству трафа, могли не приходить пуши или еще какие-то нюансы - и ты влетаешь на срез, а кому оно нужно) Как и писал вам выше - наконец-таки ребята из ONYX выкатили свой проект, в котором закрыли эти моменты, инст2деп по мо…
🤣6🔥5❤1
Из года в год одна и та же картина - вариативно или август, или сентябрь тотальная ебка и с заливом, и с конвертом Но в такие моменты главное не отчаиваться, а дальше работать и пытаться выжать какие-то цифры не смотря на все нюансы Этим я сейчас и занимаюсь) 📱 Подписаться | Чат
🔥11❤5👍1
Бля Как же последнюю неделю скачет все в фб, это с ума сойти спмы нормальные только на свежих кабах и всем сетапе, на 3й день улетает в космос вместе со всеми метриками кабы летят везде, сегодня почти половина кабов на 4х агентах у меня улетела крутит максимально непонятно, если у тебя перепал день с низким спмом - он не крутит, а когда он в космосе - пиздует как ни в чем не бывало фу именно 📱 Подписаться | Ч…
🔥7❤3👍1
Всем привет 👋 Вышел по своему основному потоку на какие-то +- адекватные цифры по обьему, последние дни качало по конверту страшно именно то есть результат, то нет, то спмы у тебя 40, то 120, цена клика прыгает как ей удобно , очень непонятная ситуация была Думаю что ситуация в общем и целом такая, плавающая, поэтому заливаю +- тоже самое, но на всякий случай взял новую воронку в тест, чтобы в случае чего было куд…
🔥5❤2
Именно по рег2депу вижу разницу в 3-4 раза от обычного
💯8❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @facebookovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@aff_owner · 22,353
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 September 2026
@piratecpa · 28,997
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФЕЙСБУКович” (@facebookovich), 10,059 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/facebookovich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.