Мнения сильно разделились. Действительно, с первого взгляда это может быть любой материал. Разве что керамогранит вызывает сомнения. Но если приглядеться внимательно, особенно к левому нижнему углу, можно увидеть небольшое смятие. Также можно внимательно посмотреть на перекрестие швов по центру. Это наталкивает на мысль, что перед нами листовой материал. На ту же мысль может навести стенд с образцами, который мелька…

Channel
Школа Фасадов
@facades_school
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
680subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002577422992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @facades_school |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/facades_school |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 680 | +2 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 678 | +5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 673 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 676 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 674 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 673 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 674 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 674 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 17s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 63.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 21.1% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Из чего сделано?
- Композитные панели41%
- Натуральный камень7%
- Алюминиевые панели19%
- Керамогранит6%
- Стеклофибробетон16%
- Стальные панели11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы думаете, из какого материала это сделано? Небольшой конкурс на зоркий фасадный глаз 😎 Вообще, на первый взгляд может быть все, что угодно. Но может кто-то разглядит нюансы.
Когда фасад красиво температурно расширяется. А вообще, конечно, это одна их самых неизведанных тем в фасадных системах. И когда облицовка от температуры пошла такой линзой, ничего красивого тут нет. А вы считаете температурные деформации облицовки? Пишите в комментариях. #материалы
❤1
Новое слово в реновации жилого фонда из Германии. На существующие стены устанавливаются панели, которые имеют: 1. Внешнюю декоративную облицовку. 2. Слой утепления. 3. Встроенную систему отопления в зимний период. 4. Встроенную систему охлаждения в летний период. Чудеса? #материалы
🔥5
На курсе "Пожарная безопасность фасадных систем" выложен третий урок третьего модуля, посвященный требованиям нормативной документации, которые не вошли в первые два модуля, в том числе нового СП550. Курс продолжает развиваться. А еще логотип стал более симпатичным) Ссылка на обучение.
👍1
Монтаж камня со скрытым креплением на аргафы. #материалы #конструктив
👍5
Школа Фасадов pinned a photo
Австралийская система для крепления плитки под затирку. Ничто не ново (это я не про них) #материалы
Друзья! Спешу сообщить вам, что обучающий курс "Фасадные системы для архитекторов" скоро получит большое обновление! stepik.org/a/281058 Будут добавлены новые уроки, материалы, темы, а существующие материалы будут расширены и станут более подробными. Именно поэтому до конца лета стоимость доступа на курс снижена! Записывайтесь на курс сейчас. Все, кто покупает курс, остаются на нем навсегда и получает все обновле…
👍5
Ламели с довольно оригинальной перфорацией. Были бы белыми, получились бы берёзки. Тем не менее, выглядит очень здорово. Как вам? Берите на заметку. #материалы
👍6
Если вдруг кто не видел #материалы
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @facades_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Из чего сделано?
- Композитные панели41%
- Натуральный камень7%
- Алюминиевые панели19%
- Керамогранит6%
- Стеклофибробетон16%
- Стальные панели11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вам проектирование фасадов в Revit?
- Уже проектирую НФС в Revit12%
- Не проектирую НФС в Revit, но хочу научиться51%
- AutoCAD для проектирования НФС ничто не заменит13%
- AutoCAD и Revit - для совершенно разных целей23%
- Revit не подходит для проектирования НФС9%
- Revit идеален для проектирования НФС14%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа Фасадов” (@facades_school), 680 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/facades_school.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.