International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 56 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net -127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,306–10,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 09:06
10,372
+3
10 Nov 2026, 09:57
10,369
+13
8 Nov 2026, 18:47
10,356
-7
7 Nov 2026, 08:55
10,363
-2
6 Nov 2026, 05:26
10,365
-3
5 Nov 2026, 07:56
10,368
-7
4 Nov 2026, 04:30
10,375
+3
3 Nov 2026, 06:46
10,372
-1
2 Nov 2026, 05:27
10,373
+3
1 Nov 2026, 02:38
10,370
-1
31 Oct 2026, 04:50
10,371
-4
30 Oct 2026, 03:36
10,375
-7
29 Oct 2026, 00:57
10,382
+4
27 Oct 2026, 22:59
10,378
+5
27 Oct 2026, 00:06
10,373
+32
26 Oct 2026, 03:28
10,341
+10
25 Oct 2026, 06:36
10,331
-3
24 Oct 2026, 04:15
10,334
-11
23 Oct 2026, 02:49
10,345
-9
22 Oct 2026, 05:11
10,354
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 10,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,030
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
60 (23 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
103,043
Reactions total
3,289
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 23:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,360
Videos
≈1,020
Links
≈617
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 19s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,899 reactions across 60 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,868
49.0%
❤
1,347
17.1%
👏
709
8.98%
🙏
478
6.05%
🔥
458
5.80%
😁
222
2.81%
🤣
197
2.49%
🤬
193
2.44%
🤡
191
2.42%
🤮
66
0.836%
😱
50
0.633%
👻
28
0.354%
😢
21
0.266%
🤷♂
20
0.253%
🥰
15
0.19%
😎
12
0.152%
🤯
12
0.152%
😍
5
0.063%
🤩
5
0.063%
🎉
2
0.025%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Point de situation sur le conflit au Moyen Orient
𝟭/ 𝗡𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲́𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝗻
🇮🇷☢️ Dans une déclaration sans précédent, l'Assemblée des experts iraniens encourage un retrait du TNP (Traité sur la non-prolifération des armes nucléaires).
▪️ Selon elle, envisager ce retrait, réviser la doctrine de défense et créer les éléments de dissuasion nécessaires sont devenus « une nécessité inéluctable » et une demande nationale.
▪️…
Preuves à l'appui !
🇪🇺🇷🇺 « Discuter des garanties de sécurité pour la Russie, c'est tomber dans un piège », selon Kaja Kallas.
▪️ La cheffe de la diplomatie européenne refuse de discuter des exigences russes sur la nouvelle architecture de sécurité européenne. D'après elle, ces négociations détourneraient l'attention de l'absence de cessez-le-feu en Ukraine et amèneraient les Européens à tenir compte des exigences …
« Personne n'a invité l'Union européenne aux négociations sur l'Ukraine », a déclaré Medvedev.
Il a souligné que Callas n'est pas souhaitée là, non pas parce qu'elle est une « négociatrice coriace », mais parce qu'elle est « stupide ».
Point de situation sur le conflit en Ukraine
𝟭/ 𝗗𝗲́𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗲
🇷🇺🇺🇦 «J'aimerais que la paix en Ukraine soit éternelle», a déclaré Poutine.
▪️ Moscou veut une paix solide et durable. Ce n'est pas la Russie mais les pays européens qui ont rompu le dialogue.
▪️ Tout contingent militaire étranger déployé en Ukraine serait une cible légitime.
▪️ Sur les « zones grises » discutées à Kiev, la position russe reste…
𝐏𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐮𝐫 𝐥𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐢𝐭 𝐞𝐧 𝐔𝐤𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞
𝟏/ 𝐋𝐚 𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐝𝐞 𝐝é𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐥'𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐮𝐤𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Frappes nocturnes massives contre l'industrie de défense et l'énergie :
• Kiev et sa région : quatre usines de drones et de composants de missiles touchées, dont « Generator » (drones Hornet).
• Jytomyr : sous-stations de 330 et 110 kV alimentant l'industrie militaire.
• Odessa : un cargo transp…
𝐏𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐮 𝐌𝐨𝐲𝐞𝐧-𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭
𝟏/ 𝐍é𝐠𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐝𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐱
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Selon le Wall Street Journal, JD Vance envisage de prendre en main les négociations avec l'Iran, avec l'aval de Donald Trump. Trump juge pourtant que le protocole d'accord de juin, que Vance avait contribué à négocier, était une erreur qui a permis à l'Iran de se relever. Marco Rubio et Stephen Miller s'opposent à cette démarche et plaident pour mainte…
Résumé de situation sur les négociations à Abu Dhabi
𝟏/ 𝐍é𝐠𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐝𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐱 à 𝐀𝐛𝐮 𝐃𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐢
🇺🇸🇷🇺 Pour Jared Kushner, émissaire de Trump, Poutine est prêt à la paix « sous les conditions appropriées ». Moscou demande si l'Ukraine et l'Europe le sont aussi.
𝟐/ 𝐃é𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐞 𝐙𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐤𝐲
🇺🇦🇺🇸 Zelensky refuse toute concession territoriale et toute garantie autre que l'OTAN. Il propose de geler le front : « Nous nous arrêto…
Point de situation au Moyen-Orient
𝟏/ 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐝𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐱
🇮🇷🇺🇸 Le journaliste iranien Ali Gholhak a obtenu et publié la dernière proposition des États-Unis à l'Iran. Elle prévoit :
• un taux d'enrichissement de l'uranium limité à 3,67 %, sur le territoire iranien ;
• la dilution, en Iran, des 400 kg d'uranium enrichi à 60 % ;
• la levée du blocus naval américain imposé à l'Iran ;
• la libération de 6 à 10 milliards de …
Humiliation totale de l’UE lors des négociations tripartites à Abou Dhabi 🇪🇺🇦🇪
🇷🇺 Vladimir Medinski aux Européens : « S’ils sont venus en touristes, libre à eux de passer du temps au bar de l’hôtel »
🇦🇪 À Abou Dhabi, en marge des négociations trilatérales 🇷🇺 Russie – 🇺🇦 Ukraine – 🇺🇸 États-Unis ouvertes le 10 novembre, une journaliste a demandé au chef de la délégation russe, Vladimir Medinski, conseiller du préside…
🇫🇷 Vous vous intéressez à la situation en Russie, en Afrique, au Moyen-Orient, à la Chine et ailleurs dans le monde, ainsi qu'à la géopolitique et aux armes utilisées dans les conflits actuels, alors ces chaînes Telegram francophones pourraient vous intéresser.
https://t.me/addlist/kMqYsIGBS6c5M2Ey
🇷🇺 𝐏𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 – 𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 / 𝐔𝐤𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞
𝟏/ 𝐍𝐞́𝐠𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐝𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐱
🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Les négociations trilatérales entre la Russie, l'Ukraine et les États-Unis ont débuté à Abu Dhabi.
🇺🇦🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🇪🇺 En amont, la délégation ukrainienne a rencontré des représentants du Royaume-Uni, de la France, de l'Allemagne, de l'Italie, de l'OTAN et de la Commission européenne. Les envoyés américains Steve Witkoff et Jared Kushner devaient en…
🌍 Point de situation – Moyen-Orient
1/ Guerre Ansarullah / Arabie saoudite
🇾🇪🇸🇦 Une attaque de drone yéménite a directement touché la tour du roi Abdallah, siège d'ARAMCO à Riyad. Des images montrent les dégâts.
2/ Négociations de paix avec l'Iran
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio juge les exigences iraniennes « scandaleuses et absurdes ».
Note : les Iraniens ne demandent pourtant rien de plus que ce que les Américains ont déjà …
👍67❤19😍5🙏5😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @fabricesorlin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
STRATPOL @stratpol · 70,621 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Prozorov en français @prozorov_fr · 24,374 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Thomasovitch 🇫🇷✈️🇷🇺 @thomasovitch · 20,023 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fabrice Sorlin” (@fabricesorlin), 10,372 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fabricesorlin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.