Buona Pasqua di rinascita a tutti voi! 🐣☺️
❤40👍7🙏3👏2🥰2🤔1
Signed BG3383

Channel
@fabbricadellacomunicazione
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,398subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001396807220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fabbricadellacomunicazione |
| Created | 13 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fabbricadellacomunicazione |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 3,398 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 3,401 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 3,402 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 3,405 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 3,406 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 3,407 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 3,411 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 3,416 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 3,417 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 3,422 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 3,424 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 3,425 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 3,425 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
284 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 108 | 38.0% | |
| ❤ | 83 | 29.2% | |
| 👏 | 83 | 29.2% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.704% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.704% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.352% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.352% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.352% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Buona Pasqua di rinascita a tutti voi! 🐣☺️
❤40👍7🙏3👏2🥰2🤔1
Signed BG3383
Dagli ultimi fattacci di cronaca, passando veloci sull’arresto di Andrew d’Inghilterra, si arriva alle sconcezze delle Olimpiadi e ai pronostici sanremesi. https://youtu.be/4scBt1ZuqIw?si=xn-VKXUmhVoVS7hp Buon sabato da Massimo del Papa e Beatrice Silenzi
👏13👍8❤3
Signed BG3383
Collaboratore amico di Franco Battiato, lo scrittore Gianluca Magi, psicanalista, parla del suo ultimo libro in cui racconta di un sogno dell’artista siciliano e delle sue implicazioni esoteriche. https://youtu.be/O_CaX-EK1gw?si=zpjDmd1ezsoQlm9i Intervista a cura di Beatrice Silenzi
👍7👏3❤2⚡1💯1
Signed BG3383
Il viaggio che porta alla creazione di Interstellar inizia tra le maglie della fisica teorica e nelle conversazioni tra la produttrice Lynda Obst e il fisico Kip Thorne. I due, che avevano avuto una breve frequentazione anni prima, rimasero amici e decisero di collaborare a un progetto per portare sul grande schermo le meraviglie dell’universo. Inizialmente venne affidato alla regia di Steven Spielberg, con Jonathan …
❤6👏5👍2
Signed BG3383
Il caso degli Epstein Files continua a scuotere l’opinione pubblica mondiale, emergendo prepotentemente dal sottobosco del web per imporsi anche sui media mainstream. Nonostante il passare degli anni, quello che inizialmente appariva come uno scandalo circoscritto a un “finanziere depravato” si sta rivelando un vero e proprio vaso di Pandora, capace di far tremare le fondamenta dell’élite globale. https://youtu.be/…
👍10❤3
Signed BG3383
Appuntamento del sabato mattina con Massimo del Papa e Beatrice Silenzi. https://youtu.be/-b3NCxoyD-g?si=KdbPb6nStXbCgmUn Tra gli argomenti di oggi: il Festival di Sanremo, con i cantanti ospiti al Quirinale e gli Epstein files. Fabbrica della Comunicazione
👍8❤3👏1
Signed BG3383
Channel photo updated
Per decenni, Bill Gates è stato il volto del progresso: il genio informatico trasformatosi in “benefattore”, “salvatore del mondo”, attraverso la sua fondazione. Oggi, quel frame edulcorato che lo dipingeva come lo Sheldon Cooper della geopolitica sta andando in frantumi. È una demolizione controllata che passa per i files del caso Epstein. Il catalizzatore della “morte sociale” di Bill Gates è indubbiamente il lega…
👏8👍4❤3
Signed BG3383
Chi sono davvero i “potenti” che muovono le fila del mondo? È necessario mmergersi nella complessità di un sistema che non è affatto monolitico. Il punto di partenza è il coinvolgimento mediatico di figure come Bill Gates nel caso Epstein. Ne parla con Beatrice Silenzi, il giornalista di inchiesta Franco Fracassi che ammonisce: l’errore più comune è la semplificazione. Definire “l’élite” come un gruppo unico e coor…
❤8👍5
Signed BG3383
L’Italia di oggi sembra trovarsi esattamente in quel punto: un territorio dove tutto può convivere con tutto, anche quando è logicamente, eticamente e simbolicamente incompatibile. Non è pluralismo. È pandemonio. L’impressione è che la coerenza non sia più un valore richiesto, né a chi governa, né a chi comunica, né a chi consuma informazione. Cantanti che si dichiarano “antisistema” si esibiscono nei più grandi eve…
👍6❤4👏2
Signed BG3383
L’analfabetismo in Italia ha sempre avuto una doppia natura: da un lato materiale, cioè legata all’incapacità di leggere e scrivere, dall’altro funzionale e simbolica, riflesso di una frattura sociale ed economica. Nel 1861, anno dell’Unità d’Italia, quasi l’80 per cento della popolazione era analfabeta. Un dato impressionante che segnalava non soltanto un ritardo scolastico, ma soprattutto un divario di sviluppo tra…
👍9❤2
Signed BG3383
l mondo dell’ipnosi esercita da sempre un fascino. Per molti è un territorio di confine tra la scienza e il mistero, un’esperienza che promette di svelare segreti nascosti del nostro essere. Eppure, come spiega la Dott.ssa Cristina Ombra, Psicoterapeuta, esperta in psicoterapia ipnotica ericksoniana e meditazione, l’ipnosi è molto più di una curiosità da palcoscenico: è uno stato di attenzione focalizzata che permet…
👏5👍4
Signed BG3383
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fabbricadellacomunicazione. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fabbrica Della Comunicazione” (@fabbricadellacomunicazione), 3,398 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fabbricadellacomunicazione.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.