Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تصــاميم بدون أسم 📸

@fa9921

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,626subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396403669
TypeChannel
Username@fa9921
Descriptionقناة تصاميم بدون أسم . سعدنا بتواجدكم. اهلا وسهلا بكم https://t.me/fa9921
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fa9921

Growth

7,6247,6267,62511 Aug 2026, 01:30 — 7,624 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:38 — 7,626 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:3011 Aug 2026, 10:38
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,624–7,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:387,626+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:307,624first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 7,626 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.871%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total32,981
Reactions total257
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,170
Videos
8,270
Links
32

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 56s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

257 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15660.7%
👍9737.7%
👏20.778%
💔10.389%
💘10.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC628 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍10

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC601 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍72

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC571 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍6

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC569 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍6

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC555 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC791 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC798 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

9

Signed نوران الهذلي

11 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC790 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11

Signed نوران الهذلي

10 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC938 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

7

Signed نوران الهذلي

9 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

7

Signed نوران الهذلي

7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,580 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إما عزيمة صبر تضرب بها الأمثال ولا خلك لدروس الليالي ضحيّة

👍13👏1

Signed 𝓕𝓪𝓻𝓱𝓪𝓷 𝓐𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓲

7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝓕𝓪𝓻𝓱𝓪𝓷 𝓐𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓲

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @fa9921. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

❣️صباحات و منوعات❣حالات .ستوريات .اقتباسات
@jolnar11 · 243,544
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
ذووق الخواطر 🌸❤️
@q_ggi · 153,810
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
اقتباسات روعة 🤍🌱
@shsvsbbs · 230,539
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تصــاميم بدون أسم 📸” (@fa9921), 7,626 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fa9921.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.