Самые свежие новости о Формуле-1
№ 7799191095
❤️Смотрите гонки с нами:
ТГ - https://t.me/+DsBZn_i83REwNjIy
ВК - vk.com/fdvlive
Ютуб канал - clck.ru/e4xKm
Реклама: @Sengular
@shashlyk1991
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,864. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,199–19,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 17:48
18,564
+50
9 Nov 2026, 21:20
18,514
+83
8 Nov 2026, 12:21
18,431
+63
7 Nov 2026, 09:07
18,368
+29
6 Nov 2026, 11:26
18,339
+22
5 Nov 2026, 12:46
18,317
+18
4 Nov 2026, 13:17
18,299
+57
3 Nov 2026, 13:10
18,242
+28
2 Nov 2026, 15:27
18,214
+107
1 Nov 2026, 12:16
18,107
+133
31 Oct 2026, 09:27
17,974
+13
30 Oct 2026, 10:46
17,961
+4
29 Oct 2026, 08:36
17,957
-6
28 Oct 2026, 03:35
17,963
-4
26 Oct 2026, 23:47
17,967
-1
26 Oct 2026, 03:14
17,968
+58
25 Oct 2026, 04:09
17,910
+23
24 Oct 2026, 05:10
17,887
+16
23 Oct 2026, 03:09
17,871
+8
22 Oct 2026, 06:07
17,863
first reading
Engagement
911 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 18,564 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,370
338 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
338
of 911 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
911 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
1,139,496
Reactions total
80,969
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 04:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,100
Videos
≈725
Links
≈5,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
29m 33s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 71 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
222,784 reactions across 910 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
110,929
49.8%
❤🔥
27,204
12.2%
🤡
11,077
4.97%
🔥
10,935
4.91%
custom 5278416232989612108
10,594
4.76%
custom 5208696505615017841
7,876
3.54%
😭
5,919
2.66%
custom 5213394031605735369
5,635
2.53%
😢
5,372
2.41%
😁
5,220
2.34%
custom 5213049265990952714
5,137
2.31%
🤣
3,132
1.41%
👍
2,298
1.03%
custom 5195383240868791736
2,271
1.02%
custom 5285348636622873004
1,628
0.731%
😱
1,314
0.59%
🙏
1,175
0.527%
🤯
1,014
0.455%
⚡
918
0.412%
🎉
719
0.323%
8 further kinds
2,417
1.08%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 910 of the 911 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222,784 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 911 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 338 posts held from the last 30 days (0.296%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏁 ИТОГИ ДНЯ · 12 ноября
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ Рейсинг Буллз сохранила состав на 2027 год
▸ Джордж Расселл подтвердил верность Тото Вольффу в трудные времена, отметив роль всей команды в победе в Кубке конструкторов
▸ Ральф Шумахер высказал мнение о потенциале Кими Антонелли и критически отозвался об управлении командой Льюисом Хэмилтоном
👉 ФДВ. Подписаться
⚡Мы тешимся распрей Хэмилтон - Леклер. Но ради чего? Мы отдаем себе отчет, что вице-чемпионом станет Ферстаппен, который до начала лета управлял машиной, у которой отваливались детали? Вопрос: можно ли так продолжать до бесконечности? Абсолютно нет. Тот, у кого в руках один из остатков национальных символов, а именно Феррари, имеет ли он план, программу, проект, хоть какую-то идею на будущее - говоря о Ф1? Хотелось б…
⚡Он искал оправдания, чтобы оправдать совершенную глупость. С Шумахером я никогда не видел подобной ошибки. Было доверие, - Луиджи Маццола, бывший инженер Феррари, об игнорировании Льюисом приказа из боксов в Бразилии
👉 ФДВ. Подписаться
⚡Сближение по темпу произошло раньше, чем мы все ожидали. Это признак довольно серьезных ограничений регламента. Тем не менее вы видите машины с визуально разными концепциями и видите, как сражаются четыре топ-команды, что является отличным положением для спорта. Так что давайте посмотрим, как все сложится на второй год. Но справедливо сказать, что уже во второй половине 2026 года оказаться в ситуации, когда ты приез…
😅Все старшие руководители Мерседес парковались в другой зоне в Брэкли. И Джеймс Эллисон намеренно никогда не мыл свою машину, потому что знал, что это сведет Тото Вольффа с ума - что его машина грязная. И что делал Тото? Он заставлял ребят мыть машину Джеймса, когда тот не смотрел. Но другая вещь, которую он делал и которая мне очень нравилась - он заходил в кабинет Тото на совещание, ел печенье и следил за тем, чтоб…
⚡Я полностью верю в Джеймса Ваулза, в руководящую команду Уильямса и Dorilton, которые делают то, что нужно, чтобы переломить ситуацию. Но это может занять немного больше времени, чем кому-либо из нас хотелось бы, - Клэр Уильямс
👉 ФДВ. Подписаться
⚡Otro Capital рассматривала возможность продажи своих 24% акций Альпин, чтобы инвестировать их в Астон Мартин, - журналист Марк Лимахер
В компании считали, что Астон Мартин имеет более высокий потенциал роста стоимости
⚠️Однако результаты 2026 года заставили Otro Capital пересмотреть свои инвестиции
👉 ФДВ. Подписаться
⚡Мерседес прибавил от 10 до 20 л. с. в 2026 году без использования ADUO, - AutoRacer
Благодаря лучшей настройке двигателя и обновлению батареи для повышения надежности в Австрии
❌Эта прибавка нейтрализовала как минимум одно из двух обновлений ADUO у Феррари, которая получила около 15 л. с. за счет нового турбонаддува
👉 ФДВ. Подписаться
⚡Хэмилтон так и не научился вести за собой команду - ни при Тото Вольффе, ни при Роне Деннисе. Впрочем, это никогда и не было его работой. Ему просто нужно было садиться в машину и ехать как можно быстрее. Это видно, и я думаю, что это также сделало его довольно эгоистичным. В Феррари привыкли к тому, что пилот может выдвигать требования, но это все еще идет от Михаэля Шумахера, от того, что он там оставил после себя…
⚡Успех Кими - особенный. Мы узнали его, когда он был еще ребенком, и поддерживали на пути от нашей молодежной программы до Формулы-1, а затем и до титула чемпиона мира. Но он полностью заслужил этот успех. На трассе, находясь под огромным давлением, он сделал все, что от него требовалось, и заслуживает всего, что дает статус чемпиона мира, - Тото Вольфф
👉 ФДВ. Подписаться
🤡125❤65🎉17❤🔥9custom 52784162329896121086🔥3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 911 posts we hold for @f1forall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @f1forall as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
6.9 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Формула для всех // ФДВ” (@f1forall), 18,564 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f1forall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.