Channel
@ezotaro_ri
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001757669548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ezotaro_ri |
| Description | Эзотерический канал 🪬 ❗️Я ничего не пропагандирую и ни к чему не призываю, информация предоставлена исключительно в ознакомительных целях ❗️ 📣 По всем вопросам: @ezo_adm 📣 Отзывы: @ezotaro_ri_otz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ezotaro_ri |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 182 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 182 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
135 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 28.1% | |
| 💋 | 21 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 13.3% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 10.4% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🙊 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5222385068898537156 | 1 | 0.741% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.741% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ezotaro_ri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 January 2025 to 3 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Планируются новогодние скидки в 50%, вопрос только на что? ❤️
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Всем привет, если тут кто-то остался. 🌟 Меня не было на этом канале пол года. Из практики и работы с картами я ушла очень внезапно, и об этом обязательно позже будет история. За это время многое поменялось, но а пока я медленно возвращаюсь к клиентам. ❤️ ❤️Так что всех жду в личку: @ezo_adm, с прайсом можете ознакомиться выше. П.С. Со многими диалоги были почищены, если не узнаю вас - не обижайтесь 🐱
🍓3❤2💋2
🤗😔🤣😁☺️ ❤️ Расклады Таро ❤️ Рунические Расклады Бессрочные акции: ✍ При первом обращении скидка 15% ✍ «Пригласи друга»(Получаете скидку на ту сумму, которую ваш друг потратил у меня на раскладах при первом обращении. Важно: ваш друг должен сразу написать от кого он пришел!) ☎ Лс: @ezo_adm Отзывы: @ezotaro_ri_otz 🌟 Расклады проводятся только по полной предоплате🌟 #прайс #расклады @ezotaro_ri
❤3💋2💔2
Твой самый странный вопрос на раскладе ☺️ Пожалуй самым запоминающимся был расклад на 34 вопроса.. Мы с девушкой раскладывали «Стоит ли ей завтра одеть красную кофту?», «Стоит ли ей завтра одеть черные брюки?» и тд. И так прошлись полностью по всему ее гардеробу…. У нее было свидание на следующий день, вы вообще понимаете уровень подготовки?
🤣14❤6👏4🔥1🙊1
стихийная магия и программные свечи да или нет? многие считают их слабыми однозначно да!! стихийная магия далеко не слабая, ее просто незаслуженно обходят стороной. если углубляться в ее изучение и брать чуть больше, чем просто свечи - это точно такая же полноценная традиция. также очень многое зависит от самого практика. не бывает сильных или слабых направлений. кто-то и просто начитками и заговором сможет добиться…
❤3💋1🔥1
почему больше не берешь за сд? у меня многое изменилось в жизни, я стала больше ценить свое время и силы. работая за сд я очень часто брала огромные списки вопросов за копейки, а потом это приживалось и я так и работала. поэтому сейчас вот так)
🎉3❤2🔥2
давайте интерактив с анонимкой проведем, пока домой еду!! t.me/anonque_bot?start=kybwf с вас интересные вопросы, с меня интересные истории
❤2🔥1🥰1
примерно так выглядит рабочий аккаунт, когда я на какое-то время пропадаю на больничный 🫣
😢5🙈4🌚2❤1💋1custom 52223850688985371561
😊💋😔☺️ 😔💋😭😡 ❤️«руническая магия» ❤️ «проживание рун» ❤️«рунические расклады и диагностики» ☎ Лс: @ezo_adm #прайс @ezotaro_ri
❤6❤🔥2🔥2💋1
Как вселенная скажет вам о том, что вы двигаетесь в неверном направлении? @ezotaro_ri
❤5🔥4💋3
https://t.me/boost/ezotaro_ri голосуем за канал, а я добавлю прикольные реакции с тарошками 🪬❣️
🔥7
Сегодня делаю раскладики за сд (свободный донат), а не по прайсу ❣️ лс: @ezo_adm
❤4💋3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ezotaro_ri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Планируются новогодние скидки в 50%, вопрос только на что? ❤️
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2025 to 3 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Таро | Эзотерика от Ri” (@ezotaro_ri), 182 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ezotaro_ri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.