Channel
@ezdevaj101
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,540subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001106361258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ezdevaj101 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 April 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ezdevaj101 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ezdevaj100/410093 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC | @ezdevaj101/13637 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ezdevaj100/410154 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC | @ezdevaj101/13642 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @ezdevaj100/410266 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC | @ezdevaj101/13653 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @ezdevaj100/410296 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC | @ezdevaj101/13655 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ezdevaj100 | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ezdevaj100 (14–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ezdevaj100. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 1,540 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,541 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 1,542 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,192 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
۵/۱۶-معرفی دخترخانم🌺کد ۱۹۸۵- متولد 78 ، قد ۱۶۷ کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی صنایع، کارمند بخش خصوصی مرتبط با رشته تحصیلی پوست گندمی روشن اعتقادی: (مقید به واجبات) پوشش،چادر و مانتو پوشیده پدر مهندس صنایع و کارمند اصالت اصفهان، ساکن بزرگمهر 🪷@Ezdevaj100 خواهان آقا پسر: تحصیلکرده، با ایمان، مذهبی متعادل (مقید به واجبات)، با اخلاق، با اصالت، دارای شغل مناسب (به صورت کلی متناسب و همکفو) لطفا فقط تماس مادران 🍃🌺 ۰۹۱۳۴۱۴۲۴۰۴
🍀💞🍀 💞سمینار ازدواج فضایی برای - حذف کافی شاپ - دیدارهای خانوادگی و - شروع آشنایی و دیدار خواستگاری در کنار خانواده با امید به خوشبختی جوانان @Ezdevaj100 🍀💞🍀💞
عزیزان 🌸 تک بعدی نباشیم پس: حکم قطعیای وجود ندارد که بگوییم کسی را که از بابت چهره پسندیده اید حتما همیشه خواهید پسندید و کسی را که نپسندیده اید، همیشه نخواهید پسندید. 🤔 هیچگاه با اولین ملاقات همه چیز مشخص نمیشود. باید دست کم ۳ تا ۵ جلسه شخصی را ببینید تا بتوانید به صورت تقریبی بگویید که حس پایدار شما نسبت به چهره او، چه خواهد بود. 🧐 تغییر حس نسبت به چهره به موارد بسیاری بستگی دارد. 😁 کسی که اخلاقش خوب است ،گاهی…
💞💞💞 عزیزان 🌸🌸 تک بعدی نباشیم !!! 😳 #چهره ها دو حالت دارند یا دل نشین هستند/ و یا دلنشین نیستند . 💠تا به حال حتما در مدرسه، دانشگاه و یا سر کار، برای شما پیش آمده که وقتی برای بار اول کسی را دیده اید و فکر کرده اید چهره خوبی دارد، بعد از چند بار دیدن آن شخص با فاصله زمانی، قیافه اش دیگر به جذابیت روز اول نبوده و یا حتی گاهی پیش میآید که چهره اش دل را میزند. 🔹 برخی هم بوده اند که چهرهشان برای ما همیشه جذاب بوده است…
﷽ ✨امروز جمعه ↶ ✧ 16 مرداد 1405 ه.ش ❖ 23 صفر 1447 ه.ق ✧ 7 آگوست 2026 میلادی @Ezdevaj100 🍀💞🍀💞
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌿🍀🌿 💢بجای قهر کردن، چه کنیم؟! در شرایطی که با همسرتان به مشکلی برخورده اید که ادامه صحبت کردن در مورد آن تنها به مشاجرات بیشتر ختم می شود، بهترین راهحل موقت این است که از روش سکوت استفاده کنند، نه روش قهر کردن! در روش سکوت که راهکاری موقت است، فرد باید به طرف مقابل توضیح دهد که: «با توجه به شرایطی که بین ما ایجاد شده و ناشی از هیجان است، ادامه بحث میتواند شرایطمان را بدتر کند. بنابراین ترجیح میدهم در این راب…
۵/۶-معرفی دختر خانم عقدناموفق🌻کد ۹۹۳ متولد ۶۸ . قد۱۵۶ . مدرک تحصیلی دیپلم. چادری گاهی مانتویی. عقد ناموفق کوتاه ۱۱سال (سال ۹۴) شغل پدر بازنشسته. @Ezdevaj100 خواهان همسر: با ایمان . شغل مناسب. 💥ازدواج ناموفق بدون فرزند لطفا پیام به معرف 🌻🌻@az_sajad
🌸🍀🌸 آیا باور می کردیم بچه هامون به این زودی بزرگ بشن 😍 و حالا نوبت ما شد که پس از پدری و مادری اینبار ،پدر بزرگ و مادر بزرگ شویم. 🌷یادش به خیر چه روزایی بود با بچه های کوچیک شلوغی خونه هامون ، سفره ای که گاهی صبح تا شب ، نوبت به نوبت پهن می شد سماوری که از صبح روشن میشد و چای نبات خونه مادر و دورهمی اش خیلی زود گذشت و یادش بخیر ، چقدر زیبا و خاطره انگیز بود❤️ 🤲❤️به امید روزهای خوش زندگی که می تونیم در کنار همسر …
🌴 همراهان فرهیخته . در نمایش زندگی هر کس به اقتضای سن و شرایطی که برایش پیش میاید ، نقش های مختلفی را بازی می کند . 🙌 خانم ها ممکنه عروس ، مادر ، مادر زن یا مادر شوهر شوند . وایفای هر نقشی ، 👈سختی ها و مهارت های خاص می طلبد. و امروز نقش مادر شوهر ♻️ و صدالبته و مسلمه که : ❗️عروس خانم هم باید از همه نظر احترام بزرگترا، را داشته باشه. تا این حرفا تحقق پیدا کنه. 🤔🧐 اگر مادر شوهر شدم حتما یادم باشد!! ❤️یادم باشد مادر…
Sticker, posted without a caption
☘💞☘ 💟"راهکار مقابله با همسر بهانهگیر!" 🌸 همچون مُسَکِّن آرامبخش باشید. بهانه جوییهای همسرتان علتی دارد، بیتردید او دچار مشکلی شده است. مشکلی که شاید به دلایلی چون خجالت کشیدن، صلاح ندانستن، سرزنش و... حاضر نیست به شما بگوید. 🤔در چنین مواقعی پایگاه امنیت همسرتان باشید و او را به آرامش دعوت کنید. به حریم شخصی همسرتان احترام بگذارید و هرگز کنکاش و تجسس نکنید بپذیرید همسرتان اکنون نیازمند انرژی مثبت و نیروبخش است…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @ezdevaj101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ezdevaj101 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معرفی جوانان” (@ezdevaj101), 1,540 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ezdevaj101.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.