Часть азарта, уюта и отличного настроения!
Подпишись, чтобы стать лучше и принимать участие в ежедневных событиях канала🙌
Мой канал - https://www.youtube.com/@EXTRIM
— По всем вопросам - @merlmanager #cs2 #кейсбатл #casebattleкупоны
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
16 measurements spanning 18 days, net +709. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,937–64,395 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 20:23
64,227
+1,122
23 Aug 2026, 08:26
63,105
-140
20 Aug 2026, 17:55
63,245
-46
19 Aug 2026, 20:44
63,291
+20
18 Aug 2026, 17:32
63,271
-42
17 Aug 2026, 15:59
63,313
-29
16 Aug 2026, 08:47
63,342
-102
14 Aug 2026, 18:35
63,444
-15
13 Aug 2026, 09:17
63,459
-42
12 Aug 2026, 08:52
63,501
+3
11 Aug 2026, 07:05
63,498
-88
10 Aug 2026, 04:21
63,586
-28
9 Aug 2026, 02:53
63,614
+62
8 Aug 2026, 03:01
63,552
+34
7 Aug 2026, 01:15
63,518
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:06
63,518
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 64,227 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
40 (14 July 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
303,180
Reactions total
4,409
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 01:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,180
Videos
≈94
Links
≈3,380
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
7,295 reactions across 40 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,494
47.9%
🔥
2,486
34.1%
👍
382
5.24%
🤯
205
2.81%
😱
202
2.77%
💅
187
2.56%
🙏
145
1.99%
🥰
81
1.11%
🦄
40
0.548%
🎉
22
0.302%
💯
17
0.233%
😎
15
0.206%
🤝
10
0.137%
😍
9
0.123%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я удалил тот самый лютый ролик на 25+ биткоин кейсов на кб, на который у меня было потрачено 19 дней жесткой лудки, 20+ минут материала было просто выебано ютубом и не продвинуто моим дорогим подписчикам.
Я подумал, и выделил 6000$ депа на кб, чтобы ДОСНЯТЬ для вас ВСЕ ТАКИ рекорд в открытии 40+ этих ебаных кейсов.
Собственно как вы уже поняли будет выложен в будущем сегодняшний ролик с невьбенным ДОПОЛНЕНИЕМ!
Прошу …
🎁Розыгрыш НОЖА!
Условия простые:
1️⃣ Поставь лайк на новый ролик: https://youtu.be/sqZMzvhktvY
2️⃣ Подпишись на YouTube канал — EXTRIM
Итоги к 23:00+- , всем удачи братики!
30 БИТКОИН КЕЙСОВ на CASE-BATTLE ! ТРАЧУ 3.000.000 Р на КЕЙС БАТЛ !
https://youtu.be/sqZMzvhktvY
https://youtu.be/sqZMzvhktvY
https://youtu.be/sqZMzvhktvY
❤️ ГО ЛАЙК НА БЕЗУМНЫЙ РОЛИК! Приятного просмотра☺️
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @extrim4ikos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@extrim4ikos edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 489,688 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
rushb.ru > игры, steam, подписки @rushb · 13,553#51
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NIKOLAEVICH @nikolaevichtv · 74,820 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026
Case-Battle 💣 @casebattle_official · 254,626 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 21 August 2026
⚠️ LAKMYS | НОВОСТИ CS2 @lakmysCS2 · 106,911 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EXTRIM” (@extrim4ikos), 64,227 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/extrim4ikos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
