Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тула. ЭкстремиZм

@extremism_71

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,226subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207219185
TypeChannel
Username@extremism_71
Created16 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/extremism_71

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Тула. Экстремизм — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

3,2133,2263,219.56 August 2026 — 3,219 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,219 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,213 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,226 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,211–3,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:043,226+13
10 Aug 2026, 02:013,213-6
6 Aug 2026, 04:493,219no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:503,219first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.8%
avg views ÷ 3,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,930
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total29,281
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Инструкция для понимания: кто, как и зачем может вас завербовать. @extremism_71

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC208 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kctsuPhoto

Экстремизм в любых его проявлениях представляет собой реальную угрозу национальной безопасности, общественному порядку и правам граждан. Особую опасность в этой связи представляет деятельность деструктивных религиозных организаций, которые под видом проповеди вероучения осуществляют противоправные действия, направленные на разжигание социальной и религиозной розни, нарушение законодательства Российской Федерации. Од

4 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC468 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kctsuPhoto

Радикальные идеологии редко начинаются с открытого призыва к насилию или бунту. Их главное оружие находится в поле языка и смыслов и религии. Это подмена понятий — метод, при котором привычные, устоявшиеся термины наполняются противоположным или искаженным содержанием. Цель этого приема — не просто запутать оппонента, а сломать саму систему координат, в которой мы привыкли мыслить. Когда «свобода» начинает означать в

3 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC515 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nicmp1Photo

💰 Экстремизм и терроризм дорого стоят Думаешь, один репост, комментарий или сообщение ничего не изменят? На самом деле у каждого противоправного действия есть своя цена, а платить за нее приходится не лайками, а свободой. НИЦ Мониторинга и профилактики подготовил «прайс-лист», который наглядно показывает последствия преступлений экстремистской и террористической направленности. ❗️«Цена преступления» доходит вплоть

31 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC631 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ncptiPhoto

Подготовка к совершению теракта — уже уголовное преступление. Что можно считать подготовкой теракта? Какая ответственность предусмотрена за подготовку теракта и какие сигналы не стоит игнорировать? На эти вопросы отвечаем в нашем материале. Полезные материалы: — Вовлечение в содействие терроризму — Теракты, поджоги, диверсии. Вовлечение молодежи в преступную деятельность 💬НЦПТИ 💬Мы в МАХ | #нцпти_аналитика #нцпти_

29 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈16,700 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

"СВОИ" ли на самом деле? Сегодня редакция канала хотела бы пролить свет на новость о задержании силовиками 34-летнего жителя г. Новомосковска Озиева Марата, являющегося руководителем МОО "СВОИ". О положительных подвигах организации фронту и участникам СВО широко известно. Правда в том, что под видом деятельности направленной на помощь бойцам и целям СВО, Озиев организовал криминальную схему по организации незакон

28 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC≈857 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

О быстром и лëгком заработке. Четко и понятно. @extremism_71

26 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC≈965 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Жителя Тульской области привлекли за демонстрирование экстремистской символики. 22-летний Дмитрий увлекся праворадикальными взглядами, нанёс себе татуировку с нацистской символикой «Черное солнце» и выставил на всеобщее обозрение. Не всем понравилась татуировка. Силовики незамедлительно отреагировали и пообщались с «юным нацистом». Юноша раскаялся и обещал пересмотреть свои неправильные взгляды на жизнь. В итоге, Пр

23 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈918 viewsread 6 August 2026

Верховный Суд Российской Федерации признал объединения «Киберпартизаны BY» и Silent Crow экстремистскими организациями и запретил их деятельность на территории Российской Федерации. @extremism_71

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @extremism_71. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 238,135 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тула. ЭкстремиZм” (@extremism_71), 3,226 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/extremism_71.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.