Channel
@extraprivereda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,645subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001768019008 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @extraprivereda |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/extraprivereda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,645 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 1,648 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,650 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 1,650 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (27 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,493 |
| Reactions total | 341 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
341 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5321372760717406922 | 88 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5220082330772717942 | 65 | 19.1% | |
| custom 5357447788764366583 | 54 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5211133448583936357 | 50 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5460752704399744879 | 26 | 7.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 7.33% | |
| 💋 | 18 | 5.28% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 3.81% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.293% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.293% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💜Fenty beauty lavender luv’r💜 Девки, он лежал у меня с февраля, думаю, его время пришло! Сразу хочу сказать: очень красиво, но от мисс герл Рианны, как будто бы, другого и нельзя было ожидать! 🎀Полноценный обзор здесь🎀
custom 521113344858393635716💋12custom 522008233077271794212💘2custom 53213727607174069222custom 53574477887643665832custom 54607527043997448791
У нас с Аней сегодня произошел тотальный бьюти-бранч💋 Посплетничали, бахнули по коктейлю, посвотчили косметику друг друга. Кстати, я первый раз потрогала румяна и бронзеры Rhode! В румянах нужды не увидела, а вот бронзер мне очень понравился💗
custom 532137276071740692216custom 521113344858393635710custom 53574477887643665838custom 52200823307727179423
С ума сойти, как это красиво! На лице еще не пробовала, но уже чувствую, что будет вау. С 2016 по 2020 год хайлайтеры были моим самым любимым артефактом в макияже. Я была той самой giiiirl, у которой была белая полоса на всю скулу и сияние было видно из космоса🌟 Если честно, после этих палеток от huemi хочется возродить эту эру…😎
custom 535744778876436658316custom 532137276071740692210custom 54607527043997448798custom 52111334485839363573custom 52200823307727179423
Я в своей Бритни Спирс эре! 🔪 И нет, я не сошла с ума и видео с ножами не снимаю (пока что). Я просто заказала себе полноразмерку духов от Бритни, которые были у меня в 14 лет. История такая: из Беларуси мама привезла мне новый бальзам для волос. И его запах показался мне очень знакомым и я начала перебирать в голове всевозможные варианты. И мне вспомнился тот самый парфюм, которым был у меня в четырнадцать. Чтобы п…
custom 535744778876436658318custom 532137276071740692211custom 54607527043997448797custom 52200823307727179426custom 52111334485839363572❤🔥1
Как же я люблю такие рассылки, как же это красиво! 😭 Корейский бренд huemi (нет девки, не смеемся, читается как хьюми) прислал мне очень красивую рассылку со своими продуктами. Буду пробовать впервые, но видела на них очень много обзоров с хорошими отзывами! Поэтому надежды возлагаются💅🏼
custom 532137276071740692230custom 521113344858393635716💘11custom 52200823307727179426custom 53574477887643665834
Список моих фаворитов от Небледной, на которые я искренне рекомендую обратить Вам внимание🫦 У меня есть каждая позиция бренда, но здесь я расскажу только о тех фаворитах, которыми пользуюсь при каждом макияже 💞Коллекция CHEEKSTYLER💞 Если на мне есть бронзер, то с вероятность 99% это NAKED GODDESS. Очень удачный оттенок. Из румян это оттенки: white peach, ruby и very berry(его, кстати, долгое время отрицала, а потом …
❤🔥20custom 52200823307727179428custom 54607527043997448797custom 53574477887643665833custom 53213727607174069222💔1😭1
3 поездки в Витебск за этот год для меня это мощно. В последний раз я появлялась там 3 года назад, но в этом году, кажется, наверстала упущенное за все три года своего отсутствия. Погуляла по центру, встретилась с друзьями и родными, поиграла в братц на своем старом компе, отрыла много фанатских штучек с Джастином Бибером и вынесла пол магазина Мила💅 Кстати, буду обзоры на некоторые белорусские продукты, которые я …
custom 522008233077271794227custom 532137276071740692217💋6❤🔥4custom 52111334485839363573custom 53574477887643665833custom 54607527043997448793
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @extraprivereda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 281,678 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Экстрапривереда Дарси” (@extraprivereda), 1,645 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/extraprivereda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.