Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Надя Пахирко | Похудей с диетологом

Channel

Надя Пахирко | Похудей с диетологом

@expert_po_figure_Pahirko

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

58,736subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291817067
TypeChannel
Username@expert_po_figure_Pahirko
DescriptionКак вкусно и безопасно снизить вес без голода, запретов и мучительного спорта в любом возрасте? 🔥35000 похудевших 👉 https://t.me/results_expert_po_figure 🔥Отзывы учениц 👉 https://t.me/+hZwGP7qsBDNlODcy № 6333141077
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/expert_po_figure_Pahirko

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

58,37458,73658,5557 August 2026 — 58,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 58,579 subscribers8 August 2026 — 58,561 subscribers9 August 2026 — 58,540 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58,495 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,470 subscribers12 August 2026 — 58,459 subscribers13 August 2026 — 58,432 subscribers14 August 2026 — 58,412 subscribers15 August 2026 — 58,422 subscribers17 August 2026 — 58,450 subscribers18 August 2026 — 58,453 subscribers19 August 2026 — 58,457 subscribers20 August 2026 — 58,453 subscribers21 August 2026 — 58,451 subscribers22 August 2026 — 58,440 subscribers24 August 2026 — 58,436 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58,429 subscribers26 August 2026 — 58,410 subscribers27 August 2026 — 58,382 subscribers28 August 2026 — 58,401 subscribers29 August 2026 — 58,412 subscribers30 August 2026 — 58,390 subscribers31 August 2026 — 58,374 subscribers1 September 2026 — 58,392 subscribers2 September 2026 — 58,406 subscribers3 September 2026 — 58,450 subscribers5 September 2026 — 58,458 subscribers8 September 2026 — 58,457 subscribers11 September 2026 — 58,473 subscribers13 September 2026 — 58,454 subscribers15 September 2026 — 58,543 subscribers16 September 2026 — 58,602 subscribers19 September 2026 — 58,736 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,320–58,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:5758,736+134
16 Sept 2026, 23:4158,602+59
15 Sept 2026, 04:5958,543+89
13 Sept 2026, 10:5758,454-19
11 Sept 2026, 15:5858,473+16
8 Sept 2026, 22:2258,457-1
5 Sept 2026, 13:4158,458+8
3 Sept 2026, 17:5758,450+44
2 Sept 2026, 11:4258,406+14
1 Sept 2026, 10:1558,392+18
31 Aug 2026, 08:5858,374-16
30 Aug 2026, 10:1858,390-22
29 Aug 2026, 11:1458,412+11
28 Aug 2026, 08:4358,401+19
27 Aug 2026, 05:2758,382-28
26 Aug 2026, 07:5758,410-19
25 Aug 2026, 09:0358,429-7
24 Aug 2026, 11:2858,436-4
22 Aug 2026, 18:0658,440-11
21 Aug 2026, 11:5358,451first reading

Engagement

262 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.77%
avg views ÷ 58,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
135 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.769%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
137
of 262 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 135 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held262 (4 August 202624 September 2026)
Views total140,425
Reactions total728
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,170
Videos
328
Links
2,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 23m
Average length
5m 08s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,326 reactions across 123 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79760.1%
🔥52939.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 262 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC116 viewsread 24 September 2026
Photo

⬆️Посмотрите на фото. К таким результатам девчонки в моих проектах пришли благодаря специальной комплексной программе, в которую входят и тренировки. Девочки, хотите узнать, как мы подбираем упражнения и на что еще обращаем внимание, чтобы именно живот становился плоским и подтянутым? Тогда ставьте 🔥, и я завтра расскажу подробнее! Вы сможете применить на практике эти знания и получить еще больше рабочих инструмен

24 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC118 viewsread 24 September 2026

Откуда появляется дряблый живот с нотками целлюлита после 40 лет? Дорогие мои, понимаю, у многих живот – это проблема номер один. Особенно обидно, когда пытаешься увеличивать физическую активность и меньше есть, а он продолжает расти как на дрожжах. 💬После родов был нормальный животик, а после 40 – мама дорогая! Начинается под грудью, дряхлый и целлюлитный, талии нет. 💬На работе все одеты с иголочки, а мне надеть

24 Sept 2026, 04:06 UTC850 views6 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

ПОЧЕМУ У МЕНЯ НЕТ КУБИКОВ НА ЖИВОТЕ 👇Поделитесь своими мыслями, что вы думаете по этому поводу? Для кого моя история оказалась важной мотивацией? 🎁Уже в субботу стартует бесплатный челлендж “Жжем жир на животе за 3 дня”. Проверьте, прошли ли вы регистрацию и получили ли в подарок инструкцию “Как узнать свой идеальный вес”. ➡️ПРОЙТИ РЕГИСТРАЦИЮ НА ЧЕЛЛЕНДЖ, ЧТОБЫ ПОЛУЧАТЬ ПОДАРКИ И НАПОМИНАЛКИ⬅️

6

23 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 24 September 2026
Poll

Как вам результат Наташи в 59 лет?

  1. Супер! Умница!78%
  2. Хочу так же! Приду на челлендж!44%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,040 views16 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

😍Только посмотрите на эту стройную красотку!

🔥16

23 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,040 views7 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Живот растет из-за климакса Девчонки, на очереди разбор следующего живота. Такого, который растет после 40 лет. В этом возрасте снижается выработка эстрогенов и с каждым годом сильнее замедляется метаболизм. Поэтому вес растет, а жир активнее откладывается именно в области живота. 🤕И если раньше диеты хоть как-то работали, то теперь с ними: 🔲сжигание жира не активируется и живот остается на месте, 🔲быстрее уходят

7

23 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,240 views24 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

Что есть, чтобы живот начал таять уже сегодня Мегаполезный обещанный подкаст про то: 📌Что есть, чтобы похудеть быстрее. 📌Что можно сделать уже сегодня, чтобы убрать 1-3 см с живота. 📌Какие простые изменения в питании приведут к снижению тяги к вредным калорийным продуктам, из-за которых растет живот. 📌Как есть любимые продукты и худеть. Зафиксируйте три главных вывода из подкаста в комментариях. И напишите, что вы

🔥213

22 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,350 views20 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, оцените результат Лены вашими ❤️ Смотрите, как животик подтянулся!

🔥20

22 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,270 views3 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

“Живот ушел на 7 см всего за 2 недели” 🎉Такой результат получила участница проекта “Убери живот за 2 недели” Елена. И для меня это как бальзам на душу, радуюсь вместе с ней! Лена всегда любила вкусно поесть, и с возрастом это дало о себе знать. После 40 лет живот стал расти с бешеной скоростью, несмотря на все попытки избавиться от него. 😓Живот стал похож на “беременный”. 😓Появились отеки и целлюлит. 😓Лена начала

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 262 posts we hold for @expert_po_figure_Pahirko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Как вам результат Наташи в 59 лет?

  1. Супер! Умница!78%
  2. Хочу так же! Приду на челлендж!44%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

Жмите на огонек, если тема питания интересна!

  1. 🔥2%
  2. 🔥🔥98%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTCAnonymous Poll139 voters

Нужна неделя здорового детокса?

  1. Нужна!99%
  2. Не нужна1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Кто будет на эфире?

  1. Приду сегодня в 19:0041%
  2. Посмотрю в записи62%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

Сколько времени за день вы проводите сидя?

  1. Не больше часа2%
  2. От часа до двух11%
  3. Более 2 часов89%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

Девочки, какой день ждете больше всего?

  1. Первый день7%
  2. Второй день9%
  3. Третий день0%
  4. Жду все дни85%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Надя Пахирко | Похудей с диетологом” (@expert_po_figure_Pahirko), 58,736 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/expert_po_figure_Pahirko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.