Channel
@expert_balance_system
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
5subscribers
-113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001681948177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @expert_balance_system |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/expert_balance_system |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 5 | -113 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 118 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 118 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 29.3% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 19.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 15.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 13.4% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2025 to 10 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мне очень понравилось, ты классно строишь диалог с аудиторией, даёшь сходу рабочие советы! Просто супер! По теме мне было полезно, буду внедрять! Благодарю тебя за мероприятие и за возможности!🤗🙏
❤1
Я знаю как ты вкладываешься в своё дело! Работаешь. Стараешься. Учишься. Снимаешь. ❤️ И если итоговый результат в деньгах тебе не нравится, это не потому что ты «что-то делаешь не так». Скорее всего — ты просто не видишь, где именно утекают деньги и уходят клиенты. ❤️ Давай посмотрим на это вместе. В прямом эфире. Я проведу бесплатный разбор твоей ситуации — по фактам, без обобщений и шаблонов. Ты поймёшь, где те…
❤5👏4🔥4
РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ ЗДЕСЬ
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Натали, благодарю тебя, мне приятно 🤍
🙏4❤1👍1
Друзья, очень рекомендую посетить этот воркшоп. Вы восхититесь системным и структурным подходом Марины. Без воды, все четко с примерами, с возможностью получить ответ от профи в своем деле. Очень полезное и нужное мероприятие каждому эксперту!
❤1
Разбираем нюансы, которые влияют на итог диалога Присоединяйся к воркшопу Метод личных продаж и получи ответы на свои вопросы Регистрация здесь
👍3❤1❤🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Наш воркшоп Метод личных продаж пройдёт в пространстве Kofefornia 06.06 пт 18:00 Горького 53, ЦУМ Регистрация здесь
❤3🤩1😍1
Дорогие друзья, приглашаем вас на открытый воркшоп Метод личных продаж: профессиональный подход в переписке ❤️ Если ты: ❤️Сталкиваешься с молчанием после прайса ❤️Теряешь клиентов на этапе «дорого» или «я подумаю» ❤️Боишься звучать навязчиво для клиента Пришло время разобраться как вообще это работает и понять какие ошибки мешают твоей уверенной коммуникации. Присоединяйся! На воркшопе ты получишь: Разбор и рекоме…
❤🔥4👍2❤1
Планируй июнь с нами ❤️ 06.06 открытый ужин со спикером. Тема: Личный бренд эксперта подробности и регистрация @marina_steshenko Полезные эфиры 10.06; 17.06; 24.06 от наших ТОП-экспертов, после которых ты прокачиваешься в доходе, медийности или состоянии *ставь напоминалку, чтобы не пропустить Практикум ПРОДАЖИ В ПЕРЕПИСКЕ 12.06 11:00-16:30 *это живой онлайн формат, после которого ты будешь профессионально расска…
👍5🔥3❤🔥2
Сегодня выступала приглашённым спикером на Стильном завтраке Глубоко раскрыла тему профессиональной переписки для экспертов и предпринимателей. Резюмируя: это было мощно, с живой практикой — и я благодарю вас за такую вовлеченность и интерес! А вот рейтинг речевых шаблонов, которые я рекомендую стереть из памяти и не применять при общении и в блоге 1е место заслуженно получает от слова «совсем», 2е в рейтинге «н…
👍5❤4😁3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @expert_balance_system. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что тебе мешает продавать стабильно свои услуги/продукт прямо сейчас?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ты сама понимаешь, чем отличаешься от коллег в своей нише?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой отклик ты получаешь на свои офферы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Твоя подача в блоге, офлайн, в мессенджерах — это больше про…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ты можешь чётко назвать, кто твой клиент? (не «женщины 25—40», точечно и с контекстом)?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2025 to 10 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СИСТЕМА БАЛАНСА с Мариной Стешенко” (@expert_balance_system), 5 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/expert_balance_system.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.