Channel
@exithematrix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,261subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001785127999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @exithematrix |
| Created | 9 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/exithematrix |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 3,261 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 3,263 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 3,269 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 3,272 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 3,272 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
134 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 59.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 13.4% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 8.96% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.73% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5cc5e9c2dca8019de9074c56/6393fdf6c7a3f28f55747805_THUNDERSTORM%2BGENERATOR_ATOMIC%2BENERGY%2BFROM%2BWATER%2BPLASMOID%2BPROTIUM%2BPOWER.pdf?fbclid=PARlRTSAQxZA9leHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA8xMjQwMjQ1NzQyODc0MTQAAadmoaKsCHCA1yIWLxmEhJBpgPTUqJ2HNLloeYNfBFJEyfeVoAEx_SwqOT_-Dg_aem_C1BRneiTCLIYuHse1DKxkw Combustion engines using water as fuel
❤6🔥1
https://homegrid.pt/en/solution/o-gerador-eletrico-john-christie/ Free energy device
❤6
Book here: https://thebaldchefau.com/products/wild-game-24thapril-26thapril?fbclid=PAVERFWAQxS65leHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA8xMjQwMjQ1NzQyODc0MTQAAaeZyEvSdX2ThXc4F1Pga3HEgUnE4cRrgTuANLXfLShV2Fg8ghP3o1qUEXNXEA_aem_ivY2uoOjHQhJh8qbD-g4UQ
❤6
What you’ll learn and experience: Mock hunt — step into the hunter’s mindset and practice awareness and approach. The nature of each deer harvest is always different, , influenced by countless variables. Discover what it means to move silently, sense the landscape and sharpen intuition. This practice mirrors the respectful approach of ethical hunting, where patience and attunement guide every step. Hands-on butcher…
❤4
Solutions to suspected lockdowns 2.0 My instagram live from tonight Note: zero/alternative or free energy is what I should have said instead of “renewable energy” Reach out if you’d like to help me with my suggested strategies [email protected]
❤9👏1
https://youtu.be/0ZChV8O95og?si=wFqJvl-FuD62OaWj
❤2👍1
https://youtu.be/6jsg2c5pbiA?si=s4E-1eAtciXJ_O9y
❤4
If anyone is interested in the research of peptides, join this channel https://t.me/+7BPTnDORLi4yN2E1 If you would like to research on yourself, reach out to me privately
❤4👏1
https://youtu.be/GdGtwZPimKo?si=Ulxk3LvkcrEzfz-C
👏2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJkU7EF2jGM
❤6
There’s a lot of noise right now about Digital ID, digital age-verification for social media, and the rapid move toward digital signatures replacing traditional wet-ink. These shifts are understandably raising concern for many who value privacy, autonomy, and the right to live without unnecessary surveillance. At Warrior at Law, we always return to one principle: What is within our self-determination? What can we a…
❤12
They said digital ID was about safety… but what if the real story is about who holds the reins? In this 2-minute whiteboard short you’ll see the quiet realities behind the global push for digital verification — and the one thing no system, no platform, and no institution can ever claim ownership of: you. You’ll discover: • Why “verification” is not the same as identity • The gap between public control and private s…
👏5❤3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @exithematrix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,136,437 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exit the matrix channel” (@exithematrix), 3,261 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exithematrix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.