Channel
@exhabitus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
666subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001565031450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @exhabitus |
| Created | 21 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/exhabitus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 666 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 666 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 March 2025 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 443 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
189 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 82 | 43.4% | |
| 🙏 | 60 | 31.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 12.7% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 12.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ruhe in Frieden Dani (Botti) Unser Freund und Kräuterhexe Dani ist am Montag von uns gegangen. Danke für all das Wissen das du mir gegeben hast und danke, dass du den Menschen deine Berufung so näher bringen konntest! Danke für dein offenes Wesen. Danke für all die Kräuter die ich kennenlernen durfte, deine Arbeit lebt in uns weiter. Es ist grad auffällig, dass die Menschen geholt werden, die ihr Herz offen tragen,…
🙏14
Nochmelas zur Erinnerung - Ist ja schon über ein Jahr. ‼️Her packt, Philippe Merz - der Sohn v. Friedrich Merz - über seinen korrupten Vater aus.
Dieses Video ist extrem vielsagend. 6Jahre Arbeit und eine grosse Überraschung. Sehen wir hier die Matrix bei der Arbet?
👍5🔥2👏1
Exhabitus 2 falls ihr organisieren möchtet bitte an: [email protected]
👏5👍1🔥1
Voll guet!!! Danke Ivo Laut Ivo Sasek, dem Gründer von Stimme & Gegenstimme, der Anti-Zensur-Konferenzen und von Kla.TV, kann sich die Bevölkerung nur selbst aus der Willkürjustiz befreien. Alles Warten auf einen „Retter“, der die eben beschriebene Misere „von oben“ löst, wird sich als vergeblich, ja als kontraproduktiv erweisen. – Als Volksbewegung „von unten“ kann jedoch laut Anwalt Ralf Ludwig, die Bevölkerung mi…
👍9👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10🔥4
Die Schweiz hat über eine 10Mio. Schweiz abgestimmt. Reine Kollateralbuchungen und reiner Handel. Die Menschenmasse ist eh schon bestellt. Würde es nicht sinnhaltiger sein, einfache Parameter anzuwenden und z.B. dem Staat vorschreiben, dass nur so viele Menschen in der Schweiz leben dürfen, wie auch komplett autark versorgt werden können? Dies würde einen gesunden Aufbau der Strukturen bedeuten und kein komprimieren…
👍10👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10👏3🙏3
Anfangs letzte Woche erreichte mich die Nachricht vom Tod einer meiner Herzensfreunde. Dies hat mich grundfest erschüttert und mich ermahnt mein Leben nochmals zu überdenken. Ruhe in Frieden mein Freund - mögst du in vollem Licht erstrahlen!!! Ich habe meine Gedanken und meine nächsten Schritte in einem Pdf. niedergeschrieben.
🙏14
Sehr aufschlussreich für diejenigen die einfach nicht mehr mögen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZB_kw94g3A
👍5
Für mich als Mensch, der kein Handy und kein Bankkonto besitzt ist dieser Film absolute Sahne. So sehe ich die Welt jeden Tag. Die Menschen stecken nicht mehr in der Höhle wie es Platon beschrieben hat, sondern sie stecken im Bildschirm. "Das steht sogar in der Bibel" Danke an Lois und Ivo von @klagemauerTV für euer Wirken! https://www.kla.tv/41064
Cooles Spiel gestern. Hat richtig Bock gemacht auf mehr. Ja der Fischer hat sehr gute Arbeit geleistet. Danke!!! Was mich jedoch sehr irritiert ist, dass die Nati nicht mit dem schweizer Wappen spielt sondern mit dem Templerorden Kreuz... Spannend. Nur mir aufgefallen?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @exhabitus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,161,888 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ex habitus Kanal” (@exhabitus), 666 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exhabitus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.