4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,843–5,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
5,844
-4
6 Aug 2026, 14:42
5,848
+2
6 Aug 2026, 10:32
5,846
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:01
5,846
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
61.3%
avg views ÷ 5,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,580
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
12 (20 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
43,010
Reactions total
1,718
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,280
Videos
≈77
Links
≈331
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,718 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
742
43.2%
🔥
325
18.9%
👍
227
13.2%
❤🔥
182
10.6%
💯
132
7.68%
🙏
43
2.50%
💔
22
1.28%
😁
21
1.22%
✍
6
0.349%
👌
6
0.349%
👎
4
0.233%
😇
3
0.175%
🥰
2
0.116%
🗿
1
0.058%
😭
1
0.058%
🤩
1
0.058%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,718reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @exegetik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Что происходит с молодёжью в церкви? Она действительно поверхностна, не готова к ответственности и интересуется только развлечениями? Или же мы просто не слышим ее?
Костя Донцов, руководитель молодежи из Беларуси, запустил новый подкаст-проект «Голос зумера» исследующий проблемы и боли подрастающего поколения.
В первом выпуске он и Давид Красько очень откровенно рассуждают о разрыве поколений, ценности церкви, иниц…
Крещенные по вере
Мой друг Филипп Никитин написал книгу — «Крещенные по вере: баптисты в России в её прошлом и настоящем». Издательство серьезное — ББИ. Большая часть книги говорит про МСЦ ЕХБ.
Купил книгу на прошлой неделе, сразу после выхода. Начал читать и планировал закончить в прошлое воскресенье, но неделя выдалась нелегкая. Зато вчера сел и проглотил вторую половину за раз.
Что я думаю на этот счет? Мне каж…
Что же будет нам?
Может быть у вас не будет много рыбы, но вы будете ходить по воде В.А. Насонов
«…мы оставили всё и последовали за Тобою; что же будет нам?» Мф. 19:27
Я ни разу не видел
такой грандиозный улов.
Я ни разу не видел,
как рвутся под тяжестью сети…
И в рыбацкой моей голове
недостаточно слов,
чтобы чудо воспеть,
чтоб молва разносилась по свету:
как велик Иисус!
Как Его повелениям вняв,
даже рыбы морские…
Саша Рыжов написал ещё две книги!
Господи, какое же это счастье, что я лично знаком с Сашей! Он преподает, ведет канал, пишет книги и вдохновляет своим примером.
Недавно он выпустил еще две книги. Первая — пособие по книге Неемии «Меч и мастерок», которая начинается со слёз и заканчивается молитвой: «Помяни меня, Боже мой, во благо мне!». Между ними — стена, насмешки врагов, внутренние конфликты и реформы, которые …
Вас никогда не удивляло, что в Евангелии столько много Марий? На самом деле ничего удивительного нет. Имя Мария было популярно в Иудее еще до рождения Христа. Статистически по эпиграфическим памятникам в Иудее первого века почти половину всех женских имен составляли два: Саломея и Мария. Поэтому странно не то, что было столько много Марий, а что Саломея встречается всего однажды — это жена Зеведея и мать апостолов Иа…
Помню, как мне один отец рассказывал, что прячет шнур от компьютера и таким образом он ограничивает детям доступ к компьютеру. «Нуну» — сказал я. Тогда шнур стоил что-то около 36 рублей и я был уверен, что по дому детьми сделано с десяток закладок шнуров на всякий случай.
Ну а с появлением современного генеративного ИИ и с упорным нежеланием родителей вникать в современные технологии, кажется останется только одно —…
Судит ли наш закон не выслушав?
Хочу написать про то, как важно уметь говорить друг с другом. Это помогает избежать конфликтов, лишних обвинений и охоты на ведьм.
Но этот народ — невежда в законе, проклят он. Никодим, приходивший к Нему ночью, будучи один из них, говорит им: судит ли закон наш человека, если прежде не выслушают его и не узнают, что он делает? На это сказали ему: и ты не из Галилеи ли? рассмотри и у…
На канале нашей церкви опубликовали мою проповедь «Любовь — центр христианского благочестия». Хоть тема любви кажется достаточно избитой, в ней содержится огромная глубина и сила. Настоящая любовь — это ключ к пониманию Бога, и катализатор роста церкви. Сам Бог назван Любовью.
Анализируя Писание мы приходим к выводу, что глубоко вторичны вопросы внешнего вида, посещения собраний, жертвенности и многие другие, которы…
Для подростков нашей церкви в Царицыно на выходных организовали сплав на байдарках 🚣♀️ Сплав, конечно, был не по горной дикой речке, а по в спокойной реке Нерской в Подмосковье. Несмотря на дождь, все прошло шикарно. И дети довольны, и взрослые тоже 😅
Для возраста 12-16 лет очень важны такие мероприятия. Они позволяют встроить тесные дружеские взаимосвязи. Да и просто развлечься — это же так здорово! Настоящее прик…
Почти всю прошлую неделю был на Дальнем Востоке в молодежном христианском лагере. Темой лагеря был выбран текст:
«Всё Писание богодухновенно и полезно для научения, для обличения, для исправления, для наставления в праведности, да будет совершен Божий человек, ко всякому доброму делу приготовлен» (1Тим 3:16-17)
По данному тексту была составлена и программа. Мне поручили темы о происхождении и авторитете Библии, а та…
Один маленький шаг для человека, но гигантский скачок для всего человечества
В этот день, 20 июля 1969 года, человек впервые ступил на Луну. Кажется, что в тот момент вся человеческая история и наука на пару секунд встала на цыпочки, чтобы посмотреть, насколько далеко ей вообще позволено зайти.
В связи с этим у меня две мысли.
Первая — всего в 1961 году первый человек, Юрий Гагарин побывал в космосе. А уже через в…
❤🔥81🔥55💯25❤20👍11🙏11👎2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @exegetik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 270,977 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Аудиокниги @AUDIOKNIGI_CHANNEL · 256,865 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exegetik” (@exegetik), 5,844 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exegetik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
