Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Exegetik

Channel

Exegetik

@exegetik

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,039subscribers

+193 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710530800
TypeChannel
Username@exegetik
Created11 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/exegetik

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

5,840 average views per post against 6,037 subscribers — an engagement rate of 96.7%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured11 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled64,200
Mature posts only96.7% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers6,037 measured 2 November 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1%
Position in cohort99.182th percentile · 7.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.081% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,8426,0425,9426 August 2026 — 5,846 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,846 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,848 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,844 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,842 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,852 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,860 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,873 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,880 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,884 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,913 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,920 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,917 subscribers28 September 2026 — 5,941 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,920 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,953 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,952 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,953 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,028 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,026 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,031 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,036 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,037 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,042 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,039 subscribers6,0396 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net +193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,812–6,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 08:366,039-3
5 Nov 2026, 15:286,042+5
2 Nov 2026, 06:416,037+1
30 Oct 2026, 01:576,036+5
27 Oct 2026, 02:516,031+5
24 Oct 2026, 09:276,026-2
21 Oct 2026, 16:476,028+75
18 Oct 2026, 06:265,953+1
15 Oct 2026, 12:285,952-1
12 Oct 2026, 14:455,953+33
6 Oct 2026, 00:015,920-21
28 Sept 2026, 13:365,941+24
15 Sept 2026, 21:405,917-3
12 Sept 2026, 05:215,920+7
7 Sept 2026, 20:185,913+29
2 Sept 2026, 21:445,884+4
30 Aug 2026, 17:165,880+7
27 Aug 2026, 06:545,873+13
23 Aug 2026, 20:585,860-6
20 Aug 2026, 00:425,866first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.7%
avg views ÷ 6,039 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,390
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held28 (20 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total26,330
Reactions total648
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,161 reactions across 27 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,66740.1%
🔥73617.7%
👍43810.5%
💔3989.57%
💯2385.72%
❤‍🔥2305.53%
🙏1653.97%
😭1393.34%
🤗410.985%
👎270.649%
😁230.553%
😍110.264%
😢90.216%
👌80.192%
✍60.144%
🎉60.144%
🤣50.12%
🗿40.096%
😇30.072%
🤩20.048%
3 further kinds50.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 27 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @exegetik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC≈2,260 views244 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

ABCD Вы обращали внимание на такой странный эффект, что иногда мы поступаем нерационально? Например, падает еда на пол, а мы импульсивно сдвигаем ноги, хотя испорченные брюки гораздо дороже бутерброда. Бывает, в руках что-то держим и инстинктивно стараемся не уронить не то, что дороже, а то, что легче бьётся. Стоит ли оно того? Но выходит всё как-то само собой. Есть в маркетинге понятие ABCD-сегментации. A — это те…

❤96💯57🔥48👍21🙏11🤣4👎2🗿2

30 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC≈3,840 views90 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ваня сделал хорошее дело 🥳 я в свое время мечтал о такой методичке. Сейчас уже давно не провожу брачные пиры, но понимаю, что многим будет полезен материал!

❤39👍20🔥14💯13👎4

30 Oct 2026, 15:53 UTC≈3,390 views82 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @BurundukovIvanPhoto

Сборник идей для ведущих брачных пиров 55 конкурсов и идей, которые я собирал годами: от ледоколов в первые минуты до трогательных финалов. Что внутри: • Теория о том, как строить программу вечера; • 55 идей: время, реквизит, подводка, ход по шагам и готовые шаблоны; • Четыре раздела: ледоколы, интеллектуальные, весёлые, трогательные; Как приобрести? 1. Сборник Сборник в двух форматах: PDF и FB2 для чтения с теле…

🔥46❤19👍7💯6🤯2👎1🤣1

28 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC≈3,940 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥19❤13❤‍🔥3👎3

28 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈7,230 views128 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

«Теология повседневности» — первый выпуск Принял решение запустить подкаст, в котором будем говорить о вопросах богословия простыми словами. Зачем? В Русскоязычной христианской медиасреде, мой взгляд, очень мало качественнного контента на богословские темы. А богословие — это не только семинарии и учёные книги. Оно стоит за каждой молитвой, проповедью и решением в церкви. Поэтому мы будем говорить о сложных вопроса…

🔥59❤31👍23❤‍🔥6👎4💯3🤗1🤩1

16 Oct 2026, 10:30 UTC≈5,670 views66 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @tserkovnovosibirskaPhoto

Бедные люди. | В. А. Насонов 04 октября 2026 г. ВК-ВИДЕО RUTUBE YouTube #Проповеди #Севастопольская48 @tserkovnovosibirska

❤39👍15🎉6👎3👌2🙏1

14 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈10,100 views152 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья! Я открываю предзаказ на вторую написанную мной книгу! Это — заметки на полях моей жизни. Сборник эссе о Боге, вере, жизни, совести, небольшие зарисовки и разные истории. Помните, Соломон писал: «И посмотрел я, и обратил сердце моё, и посмотрел и получил урок». Так и здесь. Я наблюдаю, фиксирую уроки и пишу на полях какие-то мысли. Темы, поднимаемые в книге, разные — это и Благодать нашего Бога, и о…

🔥65❤45👍30😍6❤‍🔥3🙏3

13 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC≈4,850 views216 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

В это воскресенье мы всей церковью выезжали за город праздновать годовщину открытия. Провели собрание, Вечерю, вспомнили пройденный путь, презентовали стратегию развития. А вечером было камерное семейное общение. Провели интересный интерактив — каждый должен был принести что-то, какую-то вещь, с которой ассоциируется у них Церковь «Маяк». Мы принесли алюминиевую форму для запекания 😅 почему? Потому что уже три недел…

❤143👍36🔥18💔12🙏6🗿1

9 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC≈10,600 views84 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Фонд «Две лепты» открыли сбор на помощь семье Александра Колотун. Думаю, это хорошая возможность выразить поддержку не только словами. Подробности на канале у Дениса Самарина: https://t.me/denissamarin/8110

💔35❤21🙏17👍11

7 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC≈7,030 views300 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Я не знал Александра лично, но будучи сам многодетным отцом, не представляю какое горе это для семьи и супруги…

💔164😭74❤23🙏18💯12😢9

7 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC≈6,030 views298 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @denissamarinPhoto

Вчера вечером погиб Саша Колотун. В 19:24 он написал братьям, что через полчаса будет в Мелитополе. Но так и не приехал. Позже нашли сгоревшую машину. В ней погибли Саша и его 16-летняя дочь Аня. Мы с Сашей дружили. Это был прекрасный человек — добрый, искренний, отзывчивый. Человек, на которого можно было положиться. Саша был для меня и для многих из нас настоящим примером служителя. Место, где он жил, оказалось …

💔161😭64❤41🙏32

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @exegetik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Аудиокниги
@AUDIOKNIGI_CHANNEL · 256,696
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exegetik” (@exegetik), 6,039 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exegetik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.