Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

БИРЖЕВАЯ НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ

@exchange_re

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,299subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003915666477
TypeChannel
Username@exchange_re
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/exchange_re

Growth

2,2682,2992,283.56 August 2026 — 2,268 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,268 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,276 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,299 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,263–2,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:342,299+23
10 Aug 2026, 01:112,276+6
6 Aug 2026, 16:152,270+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:012,268no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:482,268first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.3%
avg views ÷ 2,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total27,130
Reactions total472
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

740 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43859.2%
🔥12416.8%
435.81%
🤔314.19%
🤯222.97%
😢182.43%
👏162.16%
😁162.16%
👌91.22%
🥰60.811%
💯50.676%
🙈40.541%
👎30.405%
20.27%
😨20.27%
🤩10.135%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 740reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC≈1,210 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#парус Фонды Парус и Ozon Текущая нервная ситуация с атаками БПЛА на склады, безусловно, очень сильно давит на инвесторов. Некогда стабильный денежный поток от складской недвижимости теперь вызывает вполне понятные опасения. В результате паи «Парус Ozon» с июньских максимумов уже потеряли около 22%, а «Парус Ozon Нижний Новгород» (НИНО) снизился примерно на 20% от цены размещения. При этом текущая дивидендная дохо

👍5110🤔5👎3

30 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,080 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#статистика ЗПИФы недвижимости: рынок превысил ₽1 трлн - Отчет Паруса За первое полугодие 2026 года активы российских фондов недвижимости выросли на 16%. Ключевые цифры: ₽1,04 трлн — совокупные активы +₽146,8 млрд — прирост с начала года 382,6 тыс. — число пайщиков ₽48 млрд — объём торгов на Мосбирже Рынок почти поровну разделён между фондами для квалифицированных и розничных инвесторов: 🔹 ₽522,2 млрд — квалифиц

👍24

23 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,730 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍585😁5

22 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,750 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#parus Парус ответил по поводу страхования своих объектов Компания работает только со страховщиками с высоким рейтингом финансовой надежности — ruAA и выше. В их числе «СберСтрахование» и «АльфаСтрахование» с рейтингом ruAAA, «РЕСО-Гарантия» с ruAA+ и «Росгосстрах» с ruAA. Прогноз по всем рейтингам — стабильный. Крупные риски дополнительно перестраховываются в Российской национальной перестраховочной компании, кото

👍334😁4🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC≈2,540 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬#мысли Что теперь делать со складами недвижимости? На фоне продолжающихся атак БПЛА склады могут еще какое-то время оставаться под давлением. Сегодня утром вновь появились новости об атаке на объекты Wildberries. При этом никто не может сказать, ограничится ли ситуация только ими или риски затронут и другие складские комплексы. Если продолжать инвестировать в складскую недвижимость, то сейчас, на мой взгляд, разум

👍37

22 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC≈2,010 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#СМИ Недвижимость на триллион: инвесторы выбирают офисы - Коммерсантъ Активы розничных ЗПИФов недвижимости впервые превысили 1 трлн рублей. Во втором квартале рынок вырос на 9,3% — инвесторы ищут более устойчивую альтернативу акциям и облигациям на фоне высокой волатильности. Главным двигателем стали фонды для квалифицированных инвесторов: их активы увеличились на 16,2%, до 522 млрд рублей. Такие фонды позволяют вх

👍212🤩1

21 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,620 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ренталпро УК «Рентал ПРО» сообщила, как фонд защищает себя от рисков после новостей об атаках БПЛА на складскую инфраструктуру. Главное: ▪️ Если объект еще строится, то риски повреждения, в том числе в результате подобных атак, находятся в зоне ответственности девелопера. То есть потенциальные убытки несет застройщик, а не фонд. ▪️ После ввода объекта в эксплуатацию склад уже находится в собственности фонда и обес

👍20🤔5

21 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,670 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#склад Пострадавший от беспилотников склад Wildberries в Котовске заработает 23 июля Склад Wildberries & Russ в Котовске вновь начнет принимать поставки с 23 июля, сообщила соосновательница маркетплейса Татьяна Ким. После завершения оценки состояния объекта товары, которые находились на складе, вернутся в продажу. После атак беспилотников на склады в Котовске и Электростали компания обновила правила действий при не

👍18🤔52

20 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,720 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#страхование Атаки БПЛА: страховой рынок не готов к отдельным полисам Российские страховщики пока не рассматривают ущерб от беспилотников как самостоятельный риск. По опросу брокера АСТ, 88% компаний не предлагают отдельного покрытия, но 65% готовы включать его в страхование от терроризма и диверсий. Такая защита остается дорогой и ограниченной: большинство страховщиков вводят территориальные исключения, сублимиты

🤔82😁1

20 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,720 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#parus PARUS заявил следующее 1️⃣ Объекты недвижимости в фондах PARUS застрахованы от риска утраты и повреждения имущества. Страховые договоры предусматривают покрытие риска террористического акта. 2️⃣ Если произошедшее в установленном законом порядке будет квалифицировано как террористический акт по ст. 205 УК РФ, страховое возмещение будет осуществлено в соответствии с условиями договора. 3️⃣ Договоры страховани

🔥33👏15👍75

20 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,580 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#parus ЗПИФы Недвижимости от Паруса в складском сегменте сегодня прежили худший день с 2022 года Остальные сектора стабильны 🏛 @exchange_re

🔥13👍4🥰1😢1

20 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈1,510 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#parus Офисы и ритейл более-менее стабильны 🏛 @exchange_re

👍10👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @exchange_re. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,789 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БИРЖЕВАЯ НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ” (@exchange_re), 2,299 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exchange_re.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.