5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,656–3,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 19:48
3,679
+5
28 Aug 2026, 15:12
3,674
+4
25 Aug 2026, 20:26
3,670
+4
22 Aug 2026, 09:48
3,666
+7
21 Aug 2026, 08:30
3,659
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.80%
avg views ÷ 3,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
287
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
20 (11 January 2025 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
287
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
40 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
37
92.5%
⚡
3
7.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Do you use TOCOL in Excel?
It can be super helpful for everyday problems. For example, you've got people working across several projects, each project in its own column. Some names show up twice, some three times. Someone needs one clean list of everyone involved.
Check out this video ⬇️
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/s63hXFx9AHw
Did you hear about Kimi AI? ⬇️
Kimi Agent, developed by Beijing-based Moonshot AI, is an ultra-powerful AI assistant capable of managing massive research and development workflows. By coordinating up to 300 parallel sub-agents, it can autonomously research markets, browse live data, and build professional documents like complete websites or presentation decks in just minutes
https://youtu.be/KViyENmsv14?si=iJGef6q_…
How to make Claude work inside Excel:
1. Go to the Microsoft Marketplace listing.
2. Click "Get it now" → Install the add-in.
3. Open Excel (you must have it installed).
4. Click on "Tools." Add-ins (Mac) or (Windows).
5. Sign in with your Claude account ($17/mo).
6. Open any spreadsheet. Click any cell.
7. Prompt: "Explain this formula in plain English."
8. Use this prompt guide: https://lnkd.in/gcGWk35x.
No scree…
💡Learn 10 Excel tricks for faster navigation, data cleanup that will help you navigate Excel faster, save time with data cleanup, date, conversions, formatting, and more ⬇️
00:00 Introduction
00:11 Navigation Trick
01:20 Clipboard Magic
03:02 Secret Dates Hack
04:48 Regional Date Fix
06:13 Duplicate Copy
06:53 Excel Class
07:16 Workbook Navigation
08:58 Border Tips
09:30 Blank Cells
09:59 Blank Rows
10:17 Notes & Co…
Here are 8 AI tools that make Excel seem like a toy: 👇 ⬇️
1. Julius AI
- Chat with your data for immediate insights.
- Provides expert-level analytics in seconds.
- Easy to use and highly intuitive.
🔗 https://www.geniussheets.us
2. Arcwise
- Integrates AI customized to your business.
- Models built directly into spreadsheets.
- Boosts efficiency and personalization.
🔗 [https://arcwise.app]
3. ChatCSV (a…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @excelfeature. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Himanshu Chaudhary Maths @himanshuchaudharymaths · 65,915 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 21 August 2026
CA CS Karthik Manikonda @ManikondaKarthik · 36,450 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EXCEL FEATURES | BI & AI” (@excelfeature), 3,679 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/excelfeature.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.