Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒ

Channel

EXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒ

@examsquadbysumanghosh

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

5,919subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535718889
TypeChannel
Username@examsquadbysumanghosh
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/examsquadbysumanghosh

Growth

5,9085,9195,913.525 August 2026 โ€” 5,915 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 5,915 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 5,908 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 5,911 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 5,919 subscribers25 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 5,906โ€“5,921 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 04:345,919+8
29 Aug 2026, 08:545,911+3
26 Aug 2026, 01:245,908-7
25 Aug 2026, 11:455,915no change
25 Aug 2026, 11:305,915first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
5.53%
avg views รท 5,919 subscribers
Avg views / post
328
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.395%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 August 2026 โ€“ 22 August 2026)
Views total3,931
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTCviews โ€”

EXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒ pinned a photo

20 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTCviews โ€”

EXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒ pinned ยซ๐Ÿ“ข IMPORTANT UPDATE | SYLLABUS TRACKER & YOUTUBE LECTURES Dear Students, Here is the updated list of chapters completed so far across our core subjects. All lectures for these topics are organized and available directly under the Courses / Playlists sectionโ€ฆยป

20 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC322 viewsread 25 August 2026

๐Ÿ“ข IMPORTANT UPDATE | SYLLABUS TRACKER & YOUTUBE LECTURES Dear Students, Here is the updated list of chapters completed so far across our core subjects. All lectures for these topics are organized and available directly under the Courses / Playlists section on our YouTube channel. We will continue uploading and streaming the remaining chapters on YouTube, so make sure you stay on track and maintain your study momenโ€ฆ

20 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC273 viewsread 25 August 2026
Poll

What usually makes you stop watching a lecture before completing it?

  1. Lecture is too slow25%
  2. Lecture is too long25%
  3. Too much theory6%
  4. Lack of examples/questions19%
  5. I lose focus44%
  6. I get distracted by other videos31%
  7. I usually complete lectures25%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC253 viewsread 25 August 2026
Poll

If one complete lecture covers an entire chapter properly, what duration would you be comfortable with?

  1. Up to 1 hour11%
  2. Up to 2 hours21%
  3. Up to 2-3 hours26%
  4. Upto 3-4 hours26%
  5. 4+ hours, if the chapter requires it47%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTC217 viewsread 25 August 2026
Poll

SURVEY!๐Ÿ“ฎ When studying a chapter from YouTube, which format do you prefer?

  1. One complete lecture covering the entire chapter67%
  2. Multiple shorter lectures divided topic-wise22%
  3. No preference, depends on the chapter11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTCviews โ€”

EXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒ pinned ยซhttps://youtu.be/vGnlOQA2jAk?si=PxWat4f_ycXueSV0ยป

17 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTCviews โ€”

EXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒ pinned ยซ๐Ÿ“ข CS Executive Live Class Schedule | Today 17th Aug ๐Ÿ•ฆ 11:30 AM โ€“ Company Law: Class 4 โ€“ Share & Share Capital ๐Ÿ•• 06:00 PM โ€“ MCQ Forms Test: Chapter 9 โ€“ Accounts & Auditors ๐Ÿ•— 08:00 PM โ€“ SBIL: Code on Wages (Final Class)ยป

17 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC302 viewsread 25 August 2026

๐Ÿ“ข CS Executive Live Class Schedule | Today 17th Aug ๐Ÿ•ฆ 11:30 AM โ€“ Company Law: Class 4 โ€“ Share & Share Capital ๐Ÿ•• 06:00 PM โ€“ MCQ Forms Test: Chapter 9 โ€“ Accounts & Auditors ๐Ÿ•— 08:00 PM โ€“ SBIL: Code on Wages (Final Class)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @examsquadbysumanghosh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

What usually makes you stop watching a lecture before completing it?

  1. Lecture is too slow25%
  2. Lecture is too long25%
  3. Too much theory6%
  4. Lack of examples/questions19%
  5. I lose focus44%
  6. I get distracted by other videos31%
  7. I usually complete lectures25%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

If one complete lecture covers an entire chapter properly, what duration would you be comfortable with?

  1. Up to 1 hour11%
  2. Up to 2 hours21%
  3. Up to 2-3 hours26%
  4. Upto 3-4 hours26%
  5. 4+ hours, if the chapter requires it47%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

SURVEY!๐Ÿ“ฎ When studying a chapter from YouTube, which format do you prefer?

  1. One complete lecture covering the entire chapter67%
  2. Multiple shorter lectures divided topic-wise22%
  3. No preference, depends on the chapter11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VG Study Hub โค๏ธ Official Channel.๐Ÿ“— www.vgstudyhub.com
@vgstudyhubbestclasses ยท 54,311
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 25 August 2026
YES Academy for CSEET, Executive & Professional
@yesacademyforcs ยท 31,787
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 44 here โ€” alongside 43 others โ€” read 5 September 2026
Inspire Academy
@inspiracademy ยท 31,323
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 63 here โ€” alongside 62 others โ€” read 6 September 2026
CCS University, Meerut
@CCSUniversityMRT ยท 50,685
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 49 here โ€” alongside 48 others โ€” read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œEXAM SQUAD - The Professional Hub ๐Ÿ“• (www.examsquadedu.com)๐ŸŒโ€ (@examsquadbysumanghosh), 5,919 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/examsquadbysumanghosh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.