3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,515–2,526 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 20:07
2,516
-7
7 Aug 2026, 22:35
2,523
-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:45
2,525
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🔥 Meta2Earn Airdrop (META)
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
🎁 Prize Pool: 1,000,000 Meta
💰 Reward: 10 Meta ($10)
👥 Referral: 10 Meta ($10)
🏆 Winners: 900 random + top 100
🔗 Airdrop Link: claim here
⚙ How to Join?
✅ Join on Telegram Group
✅ Join on Telegram Channel
✅ Follow on Twitter and retweet
⏳ Airdrop end date: Feb. 15, 2022
⭐️ Distribution date: Feb. 20, 2022
🌐 About Meta2Earn: Visit – https://meta2earn.io
Disclaimer: Please do …
Meta2Earn is launching a big Air Drop!🤑 It's giving away $META tokens for free!
Budget 1,000,000 tokens!
Bot: @Meta2EarnBot
Details:
1 token = 1 USD (Q2 2023)
Reward: 10 tokens for subscribing to Twitter and Telegram; 10 tokens for a friend; 2 tokens for a level 2 referral; 1 token for a level 3 referral;
End date: February 15
Token distribution: February 20; BSC (BEP20)
Winners: 1000
Who will be the winner: 100 pe…
News💥
Our whole team has shifted our efforts to the new project Meta2Earn!
💥Meta2Earn is a platform where every user can create an NFT and add it to any MetaVerse in one click!
💥The project has already launched and $META tokens have been released
Welcome to our new project. Also you can check our social media, we are trying hard! 🚀🚀🚀
Our main channel twitter⬇️
https://twitter.com/Meta2Earn
Our telegram channel⬇️
h…
Crypto analyst Austin Arnold has named 3 altcoins, which he thinks can increase the selling price tenfold in this calendar year.
In accordance to Arnold, substantial progress awaits Ether, Tezos (XTZ) and Elrond (EGLD).
Do you hold the altcoins? 🤔
What do you consider to be the highlights of 2021 in the cryptosphere?
Bitcoin $6900037%
Tesla has bought $1,5bn in Bitcoin12%
Metaverses49%
NFT32%
El Salvador has become the first country in the world to officially classify BTC as legal currency26%
Your option in the comments4%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Happy New Year! ✨🎄🙌
May the coming year be full of grand adventures and opportunities 🚀
Signed Kate
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @evisdme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do you consider to be the highlights of 2021 in the cryptosphere?
Bitcoin $6900037%
Tesla has bought $1,5bn in Bitcoin12%
Metaverses49%
NFT32%
El Salvador has become the first country in the world to officially classify BTC as legal currency26%
Your option in the comments4%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2021 to 6 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 633,042 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@evisdme named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@meta2earnbot named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EVIS CryptoBLOG” (@evisdme), 2,516 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evisdme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
