Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for </> ๐——๐—”๐— ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—•๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฆ ร—อœร—

Channel

</> ๐——๐—”๐— ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—•๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฆ ร—อœร—

@evilragebots

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

7,081subscribers

+527 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003215560209
TypeChannel
Username@evilragebots
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/evilragebots

Growth

6,5387,0816,809.57 August 2026 โ€” 6,554 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 6,550 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 6,546 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 6,538 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 6,652 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 6,700 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 6,876 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 7,081 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +527. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,457โ€“7,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 14:057,081+205
24 Aug 2026, 20:476,876+176
20 Aug 2026, 23:146,700+48
17 Aug 2026, 19:486,652+114
14 Aug 2026, 11:266,538-8
11 Aug 2026, 07:326,546-4
7 Aug 2026, 21:426,550-4
7 Aug 2026, 19:176,554first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
22.4%
avg views รท 7,081 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held28 (17 July 2026 โ€“ 20 August 2026)
Views total22,178
Reactions total401
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 12s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

1,162 reactions across 28 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค56048.2%
๐Ÿ‘26823.1%
๐Ÿ”ฅ18616.0%
๐Ÿ’ฏ11910.2%
๐ŸŒš131.12%
๐Ÿ‘Œ70.602%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ40.344%
๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป20.172%
๐Ÿค20.172%
๐ŸŽƒ10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for ยท 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @evilragebots. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC336 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ฅ RAGE AIRTIME BOT V1 ๐Ÿ“ฑ IS LIVE! ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿค– ๐Ÿ’ธ Wanna earn FREE airtime while using Telegram? ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐ŸŽ GET โ‚ฆ50 JUST FOR JOINING! ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ“… โ‚ฆ2 DAILY CHECK-IN ๐Ÿ’ฐ ๐Ÿ‘ฅ โ‚ฆ10 FOR EVERY SUCCESSFUL REFERRAL ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐ŸŽฏ COMPLETE SIMPLE TASKS & EARN MORE ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿ“ฑ USE YOUR EARNINGS TO BUY AIRTIME ๐Ÿ“ž๐Ÿฆท๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ ๐Ÿ’Ž Your rewards can build up to โ‚ฆ5,000+! No complicated process โŒ. No stress โŒ. Just complete activities โœ…, earn rewards โœ…, and turn them into airtime. โšก๏ธ โŒโ€ฆ

โค2๐Ÿ‘1

18 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC793 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

โค23๐Ÿ”ฅ4

18 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC875 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Send this to the bot /redeem RAGE-IMAGE-BOT

โค7๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1

18 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC856 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026

The next bot will be ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿณ๐Ÿซฐ

๐Ÿ”ฅ10๐Ÿ‘7โค6

18 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTCโ‰ˆ3,030 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ‘‹ Welcome to Rage Image Bot ๐Ÿ˜Ž! The fastest way to search real images online and generate AI images for free. โœจ What you can do: ๐Ÿ”Ž Search millions of real images ๐ŸŽจ Generate realistic images with /generate โšก๏ธ Share images instantly using Inline Mode ๐ŸŽ Earn more credits by inviting friends ๐Ÿ’Ž You've received 10 free credits to get started! ๐Ÿ‘ Each image search result costs 1 credit. ๐Ÿ‘ Each AI image generation costs 1 โ€ฆ

โค2๐Ÿ‘1

17 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTCโ‰ˆ3,560 views14 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€ โœ…@RageCashAppBot โœ…@Evil_Rage_TTS_Bot โœ…@Stylish_F0nt_Bot โœ…@Rage_Link_Bot โœ…@Rage_Translator_Bot Are now fully active ๐Ÿ‘

โค9๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ”ฅ2

10 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTCโ‰ˆ2,130 views33 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

HOW TO GET YOUR API KEY โ€ข Follow these steps. โ€ข Store your API key securely. โ€ข If you don't know how it works, meet a developer.

โค13๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ’ฏ5

10 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTCโ‰ˆ1,850 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

๐ŸŸข๐Ÿ”ฅ IMAGINATION AI IS HERE! ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐ŸŸข ๐ŸŽจ Turn your imagination into reality. Weโ€™re officially launching Imagination AI โ€” a powerful image-generation API built for developers, websites, apps & bots. ๐Ÿค–โšก๏ธ And the best part? ๐Ÿ†“ IT'S COMPLETELY FREE! ๐Ÿ†“ No subscription. No complicated pricing. No expensive credits just to experiment. ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ”ฅ Just get your API key, integrate it into your project, choose your model and START GENERATIโ€ฆ

โค8๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ‘5๐ŸŒš4

8 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTCโ‰ˆ1,650 views131 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Should I add boosting of likes to this bot? Give me 200+ reactions

โค91๐Ÿ‘19๐Ÿ”ฅ12๐Ÿ’ฏ5๐Ÿ‘Œ3๐ŸŒš1

7 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTCโ‰ˆ1,820 views55 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ATTENTION: Some of our older bots e.g. Cash app receipt generator, stylish font, translator e.t.c. will stop working but don't worry we will fix it as soon as we can

๐Ÿ‘29โค17๐Ÿ’ฏ5๐Ÿ”ฅ4

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @evilragebots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 55,333 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ</> ๐——๐—”๐— ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—•๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฆ ร—อœร—โ€ (@evilragebots), 7,081 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evilragebots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.