Channel
@evilmeett
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,081subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001516263031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @evilmeett |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/evilmeett |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 5,081 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 5,088 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 5,092 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 5,092 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
136 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 77 | 56.6% | |
| 😈 | 59 | 43.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 2 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evilmeett. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2024 to 2 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👁 | Вообще на одном дыхании подкаст слушается, можно полезного много опыта для себя извлечь Я тут вспомнил, что я могу с вами делится интересными штуками, которые мне зашли и вот тут пост ✍️ Первые 7 которые в комментариях скинут несколько таймингов с упоминанием меня в подкасте (Когда Криптосвин говорит обо мне) получат по 10 USDT ☺️ У меня вот каждый раз во время просмотра: воспоминание разблокировано, воспоми…
😈10⚡8
БАМ, ВТоРоЙ 🧠 EvilMeet в telegram
😈10⚡3
✍️ | Почему бычий рынок продолжается и BTC может вырасти в долгосрочной перспективе 📈: Этот текст объясняет связь между нововведенными тарифами (Канада, Мексика, Китай) Трампом, долларом США, и Bitcoin. Вот основные идеи: 🟠1 Дилемма Триффина: Доллар США имеет статус резервной валюты, что дает США определенные преимущества, но также создает проблемы: - Доллар искусственно завышен из-за того, что другие страны до…
⚡2😈2
😳 | ОХРЕНЕТЬ Вот 4 из (непонятно скольких) кошельков скамеров https://debank.com/profile/0xf772be79bd6d1f4316e938c6c40cf68cf6911c81/history https://debank.com/profile/0x4e8f3340efbc48ec36d043f11a5f23d457db51ea/history https://debank.com/profile/0xeb095f0b2e26a2a67c11595065e459439b7de672/history https://debank.com/profile/0xd3d5af11a482a89d4bbfe4880c3d71d1de5f155f/history ❗️ | Туда до сих пор приходят средства, так …
😈6⚡4
🧠 EvilMeet в telegram
😈3⚡2
⚠️ | Ни в коем случае не вводите сидку в metamask, если при открытии кажется, что она слетела и он просит сид фразу снова Прямо сейчас например в ads браузере после автоматического обновления кошелька на место него поставилось фейковое, которое выглядит идентично, но имеет другой id расширения и просто ворует кошелек при вводе сид фразы ⚙️ | Если на тот профиль установить еще раз оригинальный metamask с Интернет-ма…
⚡6😈3
🏆 | Самое важное пожелание 2025 Всем кто читает самого успешного 2025 года в вашей жизни! чтобы рос не только портфель активов а и психологическое и физическое состояние! 🌱 Я лично по итогу года абсолютно собой не доволен так как то, что я зарабатываю как бы круто мне это не удавалось абсолютно не самое важное в жизни 💸 | Тема канала изначально мой заработок на криптовалюте поэтому делюсь, что за декабрь я заработ…
⚡24😈12
🤩 | Уже привычная с прошлого поста рубрика на моем канале: Соц опросы 😄 В целом в конце года полезно подводить такие общие для всех итоги кроме личных, чтобы сравнить и словить какую-то мотивашку на следующий год Всех благ! новый 2025 год обещает быть насыщенным на события и прибыль соответственно Вместе к победе! 🧠 EvilMeet в telegram
⚡4😈2
Сколько заработали за 2024 год в $? Учитывайте только то, что хотя бы сутки было у вас на кошельке Если всё потеряли, то как это произошло?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡1😈1
Сколько получилось сделать иксов к депо за 24 год?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡5😈1
🧠 | Еще вот эти есть дешевые NFT от Doodles Холдеры которых должны получить токены на выходе $DOODLE 💸 🟢 Dooplicator 0.48 ETH флор на момент поста (~1600$) в тайном канале успели набрать по 0,3 - 0,38 ETH и 🟢 Genesis Box 0.13 ETH флор на момент поста (~440$) ✍️ | По аналогии с Pudgy Penguins после анонса токена жду большой медленный рост на несколько иксов Я предупредил о нём 🧠 EvilMeet в telegram
😈4⚡1
🤫 | Фаундер DOODLES вчера в своем посте скрыл послание take ownership, keep evolving new ideas, shape communities, open minds, inspire new growth Если сложить первые буквы слов, то будет "token is coming" https://x.com/burnttoast/status/1869803577117655357 Пытаются угнаться за хайпом $PENGU (Pudgy Penguins) и создадут свой токен? А поч нет, если мы сможем на этом заработать? Вот бы еще один дроп на всю ферму эфи…
⚡2😈2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @evilmeett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько заработали за 2024 год в $? Учитывайте только то, что хотя бы сутки было у вас на кошельке Если всё потеряли, то как это произошло?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько получилось сделать иксов к депо за 24 год?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 2 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 707,866 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EvilMeett Smart Moves 🧠💲” (@evilmeett), 5,081 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evilmeett.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.