4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,243–1,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 15:09
1,246
+3
10 Aug 2026, 14:51
1,243
-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:46
1,244
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:38
1,244
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.8%
avg views ÷ 1,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
471
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
10 (26 April 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
941
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
83
28.1%
😁
77
26.1%
👍
54
18.3%
❤
47
15.9%
😱
8
2.71%
🤝
8
2.71%
🤔
7
2.37%
🤣
5
1.69%
👎
4
1.36%
💩
1
0.339%
🤬
1
0.339%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Москве был внезапно отловлен Егор aka @infactum и затащен в бар. Чтобы не быть задавленным интеллектом Егора, на помощь вызвал великого и ужасного Артура Аюханова. В результате было уничтожено приличное количество пива, гренок и кальмаров, а также проведена интересная беседа обо всем на свете. Доклад окончил.
Почитал тут у уважаемого Тараса Николаевича пост про конечность жизненного цикла софта и преисполнился восторгом. Согласен на все 200%, руками и ногами, некоторые продукты просто достигают совершенства и дальше их не надо улучшать. Вот возьмём к примеру OneScript. Вы наверняка заметили, что релизы стали реже, а радикально новых фич в них немного. Тому есть масса причин, но одна, в которой я сам себе стеснялся признат…
Заполняю тут пробелы в культурности, читаю классику и не только, то, что вроде все читали, а я вот пропустил как-то. Недавно осилил вот Анну Каренину, хоть и с большим трудом (все персонажи бесят). А тут вот увидел рекламу сериала "Трудно быть богом" по Стругацким и решил ознакомиться. Вроде все читали, а я как-то нет, и вообще у Стругацких читал только "Пикник на обочине" (тот, который про сталкеров), но постоянно с…
За хорошую работу не жалко и пару токенов на спасибо сжечь. Да, я благодарю нейросеть. Да, я знаю, что ей наплевать и для нее это просто дополнительная работа по генерации ответа. Нет, я не перестану так делать
Ребята, знаете что это? Это эпохальное событие. Релиз один-ноль самого лучшего в мире сервера для поддержки языка 1С! Многие из вас знают его, как "SonarQube для 1С", но это, конечно же, лишь малая часть его возможностей. Количество фич, которые принесли в код заботливые роботы, ужасает, конечно. Код, каким мы его знаем, уходит в прошлое, и каким будет программирование через 5-10 лет даже сложно представить. Надеюсь,…
Наконец-то в Москву пришло лето, а я приобрел себе нового коня после того, как предыдущего отжал ребёнок. Прокатился по ВДНХ. Хоть я и живу в 15 минутах от него и был там довольно много разс я так и не разу не видел его весь. Он просто огромный, какой-то, хоть с виду и маленький. Нафоткал что глаза видели по пути, много красоты сделали, очень приятное место. Среди прочего можно увидеть милейший ЗАГС, где расписывался…
Вы не поверите, но Дуров вернул стену. t.me/wall Правда непонятно, что с ней делать, но тем не менее
😁6🤣5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @evilbeaverHouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вечерняя загадка: есть ли в 1Script оператор GoTo/Перейти?
Да84%
Нет16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 514,854 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хатка Бобра” (@evilbeaverHouse), 1,246 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evilbeaverHouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.