3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,441–1,444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 07:19
1,444
+3
9 Sept 2026, 07:22
1,441
no change
9 Sept 2026, 06:47
1,441
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 1,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
294
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held
20 (12 August 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Views total
3,525
Reactions total
62
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
129
58.9%
🔥
43
19.6%
👍
21
9.59%
custom 5352781684754374016
14
6.39%
😱
12
5.48%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
CAE Prep: набор октября. Кабинет студента.
Пока я потихоньку вливаюсь в учебный процесс, хочу начать рассказ о курсе САЕ. Сегодня поделюсь, как именно я трекаю студентов и, соответственно, поддерживаю мотивацию не бросать подготовку на пол пути
Работа на курсе происходит на двух платформах: на Холсте мы работаем в классе, в Notion - дома. Как именно строится урок на холсте я покажу завтра, а сегодня сосредоточимся …
О чем поговорим в следующий понедельник? Можно выбрать несколько тем🐸
CAE без сюрпризов: подводные камни экзамена, о которых не говорят46%
Главные ошибки при подготовке к САЕ40%
Полный разбор САЕ + стратегия подготовки с нуля до результата - для тех, кто готовится сам77%
Твой вариант в комментариях!3%
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я поступила в магистратуру ВШЭ на бюджет!
Друзья, я каждый день получаю от вас сообщения касательно начала занятий в этом учебном году. Я долго не могла дать никакой конкретики, потому что не понимала, поступаю ли я или нет
И вот вчера я наконец-то увидела себя в списках!!! Сказать, что я была рада — это не сказать ничего.
Обязательно поподробнее расскажу вам про поступление, а пока что важная новость:
В этом год…
Как я и думала: вы все неправы 😁😁
Вчера я провела небольшой эксперимент: назвала основные «затыки» студента и предложила вам попробовать определить его уровень
Конечно, провести полноценную диагностику уровня по 2-3 фактам невозможно, но мы просто предполагали
Результаты, честно, меня не удивили. На самом деле, все вышеперечисленные факты были обо мне. Как вы знаете, я подтвердила свой С2 месяц назад :) пу-пу-пу…
…
Друзья, пока подожду ваших голосов, и днём раскрою карты и расскажу, какой же уровень у студента и в чем все-таки вы были неправы!
Пока вы проходите тест, давайте пообщаемся! Какие характерные черты вы замечаете за своими студентами? Какие ошибки больше делает В1 и чем они отличаются от ошибок, допускаемых на уровне С1? Поделитесь опытом в комментариях
Студент делает ситуативные ошибки в произношении слов
Скорее всего, В126%
Скорее всего, В255%
Скорее всего, С133%
Скорее всего, С219%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Студент не всегда может подобрать точное слово или фразу для выражения своей мысли, использует синонимы
Скорее всего, В116%
Скорее всего, В248%
Скорее всего, С146%
Скорее всего, С218%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Студент не знает или забывает простые бытовые слова, например, розетка, столовые приборы, покрывало и тд
Скорее всего, В150%
Скорее всего, В234%
Скорее всего, С126%
Скорее всего, С28%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Студент может спокойно общаться на языке, но не знает/не владеет сленгом. Какой у него уровень Английского?
Скорее всего, В121%
Скорее всего, В253%
Скорее всего, С132%
Скорее всего, С211%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @evgensazonteach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
О чем поговорим в следующий понедельник? Можно выбрать несколько тем🐸
CAE без сюрпризов: подводные камни экзамена, о которых не говорят46%
Главные ошибки при подготовке к САЕ40%
Полный разбор САЕ + стратегия подготовки с нуля до результата - для тех, кто готовится сам77%
Твой вариант в комментариях!3%
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Студент делает ситуативные ошибки в произношении слов
Скорее всего, В126%
Скорее всего, В255%
Скорее всего, С133%
Скорее всего, С219%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Студент не всегда может подобрать точное слово или фразу для выражения своей мысли, использует синонимы
Скорее всего, В116%
Скорее всего, В248%
Скорее всего, С146%
Скорее всего, С218%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Студент не знает или забывает простые бытовые слова, например, розетка, столовые приборы, покрывало и тд
Скорее всего, В150%
Скорее всего, В234%
Скорее всего, С126%
Скорее всего, С28%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Английский с Ириной Кузьминой @englishkuzmina · 28,860 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
My English WAY @my_englishway · 23,045 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“тичер женя | САЕ” (@evgensazonteach), 1,444 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgensazonteach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.