Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
165 average views per post against 103,943 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.158%. Across the 2,340 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,022–316,171 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.39% and 20.6%, with a median of 9.80%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
21 of 21 published in the window (20 exact, 1 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,457
Mature posts only
0.158% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net +1,365. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,278–137,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 09:01
103,250
-123
8 Nov 2026, 00:01
103,373
-319
7 Nov 2026, 00:37
103,692
-144
5 Nov 2026, 23:55
103,836
-107
5 Nov 2026, 02:15
103,943
-117
4 Nov 2026, 02:01
104,060
-47
3 Nov 2026, 04:31
104,107
-55
2 Nov 2026, 05:58
104,162
-73
1 Nov 2026, 08:55
104,235
-313
31 Oct 2026, 07:31
104,548
-248
30 Oct 2026, 08:36
104,796
-310
29 Oct 2026, 10:17
105,106
-212
28 Oct 2026, 09:14
105,318
-354
27 Oct 2026, 09:27
105,672
-223
26 Oct 2026, 07:54
105,895
-357
25 Oct 2026, 06:16
106,252
-251
24 Oct 2026, 03:28
106,503
-199
23 Oct 2026, 00:09
106,702
-249
21 Oct 2026, 23:26
106,951
-230
20 Oct 2026, 15:20
107,181
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.176%
avg views ÷ 103,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
567.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
59 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
3,097
Reactions total
17,585
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 11:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,470
Videos
≈546
Links
≈173
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 45s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
55,235 reactions across 59 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31,725
57.4%
😍
6,027
10.9%
🥰
5,788
10.5%
👍
5,771
10.4%
🔥
5,769
10.4%
😁
82
0.148%
🤩
61
0.11%
👏
12
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Мы с мужем приехали на несколько дней в VERBA mayr, чтобы пройти ежегодный чекап и совместить обследование организма с полноценным отдыхом ❤️
Выбрали мужскую и женскую программы, которые во многом похожи, но при этом составлены с учетом особенностей организма. В течение нескольких дней будем сдавать анализы крови, делать ультразвуковое исследование внутренних органов, проходить консультации врачей, а также дополните…
Вот, что меня порадовало на этой неделе:
Новенький iPhone и 4K-проектор, о котором я так давно мечтала! 🥹
Теперь мои любимые атмосферные фильмы о моде, искусстве, путешествиях и красивых местах можно смотреть прямо на всю стену. Картинка потрясающая, звук как в кинотеатре, а все настройки практически автоматические!
Но больше всего мне нравится, что можно просто включить красивое видео или даже фотографию на фоне,…
Это я на презентации новой коллекции А-ля Рус от Happy Baby ❤️
Коллекция вдохновлена русскими традициями и эстетикой: уютные валеночки, тёплые курточки, шапочки и другие зимние вещи с национальными мотивами в современном прочтении!
Поводом для встречи стала и коллаборация Happy Baby × Рубель. Теперь в ресторане появилось специальное детское меню, при заказе нескольких позиций маленьких гостей ждут приятные сюрпризы…
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @evgeniyakhudyakova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @evgeniyakhudyakova as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
46 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Evgeniya Khudyakova” (@evgeniyakhudyakova), 103,250 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgeniyakhudyakova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
