Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EveryonehatesRiley

Channel

EveryonehatesRiley

@everyonehatesriley

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18,900subscribers

+2,249 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003775843343
TypeChannel
Username@everyonehatesriley
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/everyonehatesriley

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,40618,90017,6538 August 2026 — 16,651 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,652 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,643 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,648 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,643 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,633 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,612 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,608 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,587 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,584 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,564 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,549 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,539 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,554 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,560 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,534 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,516 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,501 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,477 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,456 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,440 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,426 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,419 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,406 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,568 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,429 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,823 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,209 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,214 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,494 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,529 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,541 subscribers25 September 2026 — 18,900 subscribers8 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 48 days, net +2,249. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,032–19,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 12:4118,900+359
17 Sept 2026, 05:2018,541+12
15 Sept 2026, 08:1918,529+35
12 Sept 2026, 00:1718,494+280
9 Sept 2026, 17:4218,214+5
6 Sept 2026, 08:2118,209+386
3 Sept 2026, 23:1817,823+394
2 Sept 2026, 14:1417,429+861
1 Sept 2026, 14:4416,568+162
31 Aug 2026, 15:5816,406-13
30 Aug 2026, 17:0316,419-7
29 Aug 2026, 18:4416,426-14
28 Aug 2026, 17:3416,440-16
27 Aug 2026, 21:0316,456-21
27 Aug 2026, 00:0716,477-24
26 Aug 2026, 02:3416,501-15
25 Aug 2026, 04:3216,516-18
24 Aug 2026, 03:2716,534-26
22 Aug 2026, 09:0916,560+6
20 Aug 2026, 23:4816,554first reading

Engagement

130 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 18,900 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.619%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 130 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held130 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total73,381
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 55s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,073 reactions across 109 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣98247.4%
❤62530.1%
👍622.99%
😢592.85%
😁532.56%
💔452.17%
🔥381.83%
😭351.69%
🤮301.45%
🌚251.21%
😐241.16%
👎180.868%
👨‍💻150.724%
🙏110.531%
🤬90.434%
💅70.338%
🤡70.338%
🥱70.338%
👏30.145%
🌭20.096%
10 further kinds160.772%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC170 viewsread 3 September 2026

GOOD MORNING FAMILY ☀️ I AM IN A GOOD MOOD 😁 EVERY AD ON THIS COMMUNITY FROM NOW TILL 6PM is JUST 10k 🕺 SO ALL BUSINESS OWNERS, WHATSAPP TV AND TELEGRAM GROUP OWNERS AND IF YOU WANNA HELP UR BABY PROMOTE THIER BUSINESS OR HANDWORK SEND A DM PLEASE HAVE YOUR WRITE UP AND LINK READY BEFORE TEXTING https://wa.me/message/T3AU4DF6TLDRA1

2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC≈1,250 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

CAN YOU DATE YOUR FRIENDS EX🤷🏻‍♀️

  1. YES ITS NOT THAT DEEP15%
  2. NO ITS VERY WRONG51%
  3. IT DEPENDS ON THE FRIEND AND THE EX39%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤7👍3

2 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 3 September 2026

QUESTION OF THE DAY WHATS THE ONE RED FLAGS 🚩 YOU CANNOT OVERLOOK IN A RELATIONSHIP THAT MIGHT NOT BE A BIG DEAL TO OTHERS

2 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,510 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

TAKING 2 MILLION IS CRAZY INFACT I GO DO GIVE AWAY FLOOD THE COMMENTS AND DROP UR AZA HERE https://www.tiktok.com/@ranco.travels.and?_r=1&_t=ZS-99MqXiooBAi

❤9

2 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,480 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤2

2 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,490 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

THIS IS THE PAGES OF THE SCAMMERS FLOOD IT 🤝🤝 https://www.instagram.com/rancotravels?igsi=MTl2NDVyMjBsbnhwNA== https://www.tiktok.com/@ranco.travels.and?_r=1&_t=ZS-99MqXiooBAi

❤1

2 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,450 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣15❤4

2 Sept 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,650 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

QUESTION OF THE DAY : WHATS YOUR 10/10 RAGE BAIT MOVIE OPINION I WILL GO FIRST THE SERIES BEAUTY IN BLACK IS BELOW AVERAGE,, IT HAS POOR STORY TELLING, TERRIBLE ACTING, AND HORRENDOUSLY BAD PACING ITS A 2/10 AT BEST

❤11

2 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC≈2,260 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

FRIEND ALLEGEDLY DESTROYS HIS GUYS BRAND NEW CAR AFTER ASKING TO TEST DRIVE IF THIS WAS YOUR CAR HOW WOULD YOU REACT??

❤9

2 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC≈2,210 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

GOOD MORNING SHOW SOME LOVE BUY A RANDOM PERSON BREAKFAST ON THIS COMMUNITY ❤️❤️

❤12

Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @everyonehatesriley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTCAnonymous Poll248 voters

CAN YOU DATE YOUR FRIENDS EX🤷🏻‍♀️

  1. YES ITS NOT THAT DEEP15%
  2. NO ITS VERY WRONG51%
  3. IT DEPENDS ON THE FRIEND AND THE EX39%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 22:44 UTCAnonymous Poll305 voters

CENCUS TIME AGAIN WHAT ARE YOU ?

  1. MALE🙋‍♂️74%
  2. FEMALE🙋‍♀️8%
  3. GUINEA FAWOL🐔22%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 20:56 UTCAnonymous Poll259 voters

WOULD YOU RATHER

  1. BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND ALL ANIMALS41%
  2. UNDERSTAND EVERY LANGUAGE64%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

WHICH KODAK BLACK GOES HARDER

  1. TUNNEL VISION39%
  2. SUPER GREMLIN65%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

DO YOUR PARENTS KNOW YOU ARE GAY 🏳️‍🌈

  1. YES49%
  2. NO62%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTCAnonymous Poll167 voters

WOULD YOU RATHER (difficulty level 6/10)

  1. NEVER BE ABLE TO EXPRESS SADNESS78%
  2. NEVER BE ABLE TO EXPRESS HAPPINESS24%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EveryonehatesRiley” (@everyonehatesriley), 18,900 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/everyonehatesriley.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.