12 May 2024, 22:28 UTC≈26,300 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
I was asked to share this on my telegram channel:
❤51👍23💯18
Channel
Ashley Everly
@everlychannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,618subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001455530812 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @everlychannel |
| Description | Toxicologist | Https://Vaccine.Guide | EverlyReport.com // Heads up, there are fake accounts impersonating me. |
| Created | 9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/everlychannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 4,618 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 4,636 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 4,637 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 4,637 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 19 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 350
- Videos
- 53
- Links
- 238
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 24s
- Average length
- 2m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
542 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 291 | 53.7% | |
| 👍 | 147 | 27.1% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 7.38% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 6.64% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 1.66% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 1.48% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.738% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.554% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.369% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.185% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.185% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 542reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2023 to 12 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
28 Feb 2024, 02:42 UTC≈34,200 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Because concern over measles is making the rounds, again. Here is a presentation I gave in 2019: https://everlyreport.com/measles-fact-v-fear/
❤42👍18🔥12
13 Feb 2024, 17:19 UTC≈25,900 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
https://x.com/catsscareme2021/status/1757148643310624820?s=46&t=YZL4k-3RhL_HHXbbzdOM2g
👍27❤14🤬8🫡2🔥1🙏1
8 Jan 2024, 18:48 UTC≈26,200 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Tucker Carlson interviews Brett Weinstein TIMESTAMPS (08:05) mRNA Vaccines (28:57) The WHO's Global Pandemic Plan (37:43) Mis, Dis & Mal-Information (54:58) Facing Goliath https://x.com/tuckercarlson/status/1743405833667371329?s=46&t=YZL4k-3RhL_HHXbbzdOM2g
👍18❤2
1 Oct 2023, 15:49 UTC≈30,700 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Such a great presentation by Aaron Siri of Siri & Glimstad, which represents Del Bigtree’s ICAN organization. Among other things, he demonstrates how every vaccine mandated for school children, does not prevent transmission (by the CDC’s own admission). A vaccine preventing transmission of disease is the very reason mandates exist. No one should need an exemption for their child to go to school. Mandates serve no …
❤44💯11👍3🥰1
29 Sept 2023, 03:13 UTC≈20,700 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
This is several months old, but wanted to share here because it’s straightforward and likely helpful to a lot of people. I actually always have NAC and bromelain (with quercetin) in my supplement cabinet and take it during the Autumn months. https://youtu.be/TiWjleODn4M?si=-M437xyFo8kknRU_
❤8👍6
7 Sept 2023, 03:14 UTC≈16,900 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Vaccine Safety Awareness Marathon: https://rumble.com/v3aa3xn-the-fourth-annual-vaccine-safety-awareness-marathon-trailer.html Side note: Apologies that I have hardly posted here. I haven’t been posting much anywhere in general but it is hard to keep up with multiple social media accounts. I have also been in the middle of a move the past month and a half, and the homeschool year has just started up. 😬🙏🏻
❤19👍14
25 Aug 2023, 05:07 UTC≈11,400 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
This is wonderful! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 https://www.axios.com/2023/08/24/vaccine-exemption-kindergarten-states-map
❤67👍8👏8👎3
12 Aug 2023, 19:56 UTC≈12,800 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Are the Meningococcal Vaccines Safe, Effective, and Necessary? Hopefully this is a helpful and informative article that you can share with other parents who are questioning whether or not this vaccine is “right” for their child. https://everlyreport.com/are-the-meningococcal-meningitis-vaccines-safe-effective-and-necessary/
❤21👍10
4 Aug 2023, 14:46 UTC≈11,400 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronsiri/p/what-the-casual-cruelty-of-dr-paul?r=o0thc&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
❤8💯6👍4🔥4
23 Jul 2023, 19:48 UTC≈10,600 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
🔥23❤9👍5👏1
19 Jul 2023, 15:42 UTC≈9,110 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
“These drugs, called anticholinergics, block acetylcholine, a nervous system neurotransmitter, and are widely-used medical therapies. They are sold over the counter under various brand names such as Benadryl®, Dramamine®, Excedrin PM®, Nytol®, Sominex®, Tylenol PM®, and Unisom®. Other anticholinergic drugs, such as Paxil®, Detrol®, Demerol® and Elavil® are available only by prescription.” https://medicine.iu.edu/n…
👍11❤6😱4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @everlychannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 625,660 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ashley Everly” (@everlychannel), 4,618 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/everlychannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.