Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Phoenix Event

@event_phoenix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004485610892
TypeChannel
Username@event_phoenix
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/event_phoenix

Growth

118145131.56 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers13 August 2026 — 145 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:05145+27
9 Aug 2026, 04:32118no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:22118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
206.7%
avg views ÷ 145 subscribers
Avg views / post
300
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total5,694
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

قبل اینکه برنامه جلسه آینده رو بگم نظر، پیشنهادت، نقاط قوت و ضعف جلسه قبل رو بگین بهمون ببینم👇 @ph_ev1

8 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC56 viewsread 9 August 2026

بریم که استارت جلسه بعدی رو بزنیم

7 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC86 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ممنون از همه‌ی دوستانی که کنارمون بودن و با انرژی خوبشون این ایونت رو به یه خاطره‌ی قشنگ تبدیل کردن.❤️ اگه نتونستی کنارمون باشی نگران نباش قراره خیلی زود با کلی تجربه بازی و اتفاق‌های هیجان‌انگیز دوباره دور هم جمع بشیم✨ Event phoenix

7 Aug 2026, 04:06 UTC91 viewsread 9 August 2026

دوستان ورودی پارک کودک منتظرتونیم

6 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC101 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

منتظر عکسای قشنگی که خودتون می‌گیرید هستیم برامون بفرستید.🤍 @ph_ev1

6 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC105 viewsread 9 August 2026

📢 دوستانی که فردا کنارمون هستن ما برای ایونت واتر بالن تهیه کردیم. اگر شما هم ایده یا وسیله‌ای دارید که فکر می‌کنید بازی رو جذاب‌تر می‌کنه (مثل تفنگ آب‌پاش، سطل، اسفنج یا هر وسیله‌ی مناسب دیگه)، اوکیه که همراه خودتون بیارید

6 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC107 viewsread 9 August 2026

ظرفیت این هفته تکمیل شد. ممنون از استقبال قشنگتون. ❤️

5 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC128 viewsread 9 August 2026

عزیزای دل اگه تصمیم گرفتین تا پایان امشب بهمون خبر بدین که فردا شرمندتون نشیم ♥️

4 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC344 viewsread 9 August 2026

بهمون پیام بده تا ثبت نامت رو تکمیل کنیم. به دلیل تهیه‌ی وسایل تا انتهای چهارشنبه فرصت ثبت نام هست

4 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

دومین ایونت 🔹 شروع برنامه با ورزش و گرم کردن گروهی 🔹 چالش‌های و بازی ها گروهی 🔹 آب بازی جمعه ۱۶ مرداد ⏰ ساعت شروع: ۰۷:۴۵ 📍 پارک کودک ✅ شرکت در ایونت رایگان است. 📩 جهت شرکت و هماهنگی در ایونت ،پیام بدین: @ph_ev1 @event_phoenix

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @event_phoenix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

جلسه بعدی کجا برگزار شه؟

  1. دیدگاه33%
  2. پارک کودک75%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,125,902 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Phoenix Event” (@event_phoenix), 145 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/event_phoenix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.