Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пьеро ломает перо

@evaaswrt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,912subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106068533
TypeChannel
Username@evaaswrt
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/evaaswrt

Growth

1,9121,9161,9146 August 2026 — 1,916 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,916 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,912 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,911–1,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:271,912-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:431,915-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:151,916no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:031,916first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 1,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
357
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held8 (27 March 202628 July 2026)
Views total357
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

745 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31041.6%
🔥18224.4%
❤‍🔥14018.8%
custom 5353071801205284010577.65%
🥰202.68%
😍111.48%
custom 616126019963506194260.805%
💘60.805%
🤣60.805%
👏30.403%
💋30.403%
😘10.134%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 745reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 8 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evaaswrt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC357 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mywayartbookPhoto

🌌🌌 🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🌌🌌 Гагарин может быть спокоен – мы сделали многое для освоения космоса. Нова #На_краю_вселенной Каналы авторов: автор, автор, автор, автор

20❤‍🔥10🔥5😍2💘1custom 53530718012052840101

29 May 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,440 views187 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

ребят, я не сдохла 😉 а переехала в новый город и выскочила замуж, так что мой график и режим немного сбился, и я поставила на стоп выход новых глав ХК также если кто помнит, скоро должна выйти новая новелла в новом приложении и последние пару месяцев я плотно занимаюсь написанием эпизодов для него. скоро возьму себя в руки и газану по всем фронтам, спасибо что ждете мои полтора родных землекопа 🤤

112🔥46custom 535307180120528401019👏3custom 61612601996350619423💘2💋1😘1

24 May 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,680 views50 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @makeonfanPhoto

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 История: Хрупкие кости Автор истории #хрупкиекости #makeon #хрупкие_кости #бобби

❤‍🔥34🔥8custom 53530718012052840108

1 May 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,850 views59 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @makeonfanPhoto

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 История: Хрупкие кости Автор истории #makeon #хрупкиекости #хрупкие_кости #саймон #бобби

40❤‍🔥12🥰7

22 Apr 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,780 views100 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RiMiArtsPhoto

✨✨✨✨🍃🤩🍃✨✨✨✨ 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 Любите лошадей? Доводилось ли вам ездить верхом? 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ❤️ тг: RiMiArts Поддержать нас можно так ✨ ✨Vkontakte ✨Pinterest 🌸#MW #ЗП #Ланс #Курт #Зденек #Татсуро #ЗовПервородный #MyWay #ЛансХельберг #КуртКеллер #ТатсуроКагава #Зов #ЗденекДеГрот

57🔥25🥰12custom 53530718012052840104💋2

5 Apr 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,790 views93 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Очень шикарная 😍, а я решила сделать ее портреты в реализме

❤‍🔥59🔥22😍9💘3

5 Apr 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,670 views118 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

хочу немного приоткрыть завесу закулисья….. визуал по ремейку зова получается какой-то анимешный (но меня все устраивает) 🤷‍♂️ ps: спойлеры на канале я периодически вкидываю и удаляю, так что не удивляйтесь, если со временем они исчезают (ибо я крыса, мое дело маленькое)

🔥7621custom 535307180120528401012🤣6custom 61612601996350619423

27 Mar 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,830 views99 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherrybriLEkaLOPhoto

🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 Новая история в стиле Тима Бертона от автора "Зов первородный" на платформе MakeOn "Хрупкие кости".🔥 #Makeon #Хрупкие_кости #Виктор #Саймон #Бобби

60❤‍🔥25custom 535307180120528401013🥰1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @evaaswrt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,070,773 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пьеро ломает перо” (@evaaswrt), 1,912 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evaaswrt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.