Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EUROPIUM | EUROVISION | ЄВРОБАЧЕННЯ

Channel

EUROPIUM | EUROVISION | ЄВРОБАЧЕННЯ

@europium_esc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,723subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839148055
TypeChannel
Username@europium_esc
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/europium_esc

Growth

1,7171,7241,720.57 August 2026 — 1,724 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,724 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers1,7237 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,716–1,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:531,723+6
13 Aug 2026, 16:061,717-7
8 Aug 2026, 04:301,724no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:171,724first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 1,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
443
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,186
Reactions total522
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 32s
Average length
6m 32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

522 reactions across 23 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆12624.1%
11722.4%
🔥8315.9%
custom 5192857499451021759509.58%
😍366.90%
🥰264.98%
👍193.64%
😁142.68%
😭101.92%
🥴71.34%
🤨61.15%
😨40.766%
💅30.575%
💋30.575%
custom 535533610796372021020.383%
❤‍🔥20.383%
💘20.383%
😱20.383%
🙏20.383%
🤣20.383%
5 further kinds61.15%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 522reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC254 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇺🇦 Прем'єра від Софії Нерсесян – «Будь собою»

🏆106🥰3🥱2

Signed Mark поліція сексуальності

7 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC266 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇺🇦 Прем'єра від Анастасії Димид – «La-la-la Пісня щастя»

🏆12🤣2🥰2🔥1

Signed Mark поліція сексуальності

7 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC315 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇺🇦 Сьогодні в @europium_events відбувся перший день презентації учасників UKRAINIAN MUSIC FEST 2026! Було представлено представників 🇺🇦 Києва, 🇺🇦 Буковини, 🇺🇦 Кіровоградщини, 🇺🇦 Полтавщини, 🇺🇦 Херсонщини, 🇺🇦 Донеччини, 🇺🇦 Закарпаття, 🇺🇦 Дніпропетровщини та 🇺🇦 Хмельниччини. Ваші враження? За кого плануєте вболівати та голосувати? Нагадуємо: хоч у півфіналах голосують лише учасники, у фіналі зможуть голосувати ще й

🔥71🏆1🥰1

Signed 🫨

7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC343 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥62🥰2

Signed Mark поліція сексуальності

7 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC410 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇺🇦 Гадаю, можна вважати, що участь України в Євробаченні 2027 підтверджено)

22🏆12👍2💋1💘1🥰1🙏1

Signed Mark поліція сексуальності

7 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC415 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇺🇦 29 липня Суспільне Мовлення отримало звернення від Олі Полякової щодо правил проведення Національного відбору на Євробачення. У своїй відповіді мовник наголосив, що як член Європейської мовної спілки (ЄМС) має виключне право та відповідальність самостійно встановлювати критерії відбору. Суспільне підкреслило, що заборона на участь артистів, які виступали в рф чи на окупованих територіях після 2014 року, є принципо

11🥴7😍3🔥2❤‍🔥1🏆1🙏1

Signed Mark поліція сексуальності

7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC526 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇧🇬 Повідомляється, що уряд та ЄМС надають перевагу Бурґасу, але директорка BNT Milena Milotiniova намагається наполягати на Софії, офіційно спираючись на логістику, хоча насправді «місто почувається більш близьким до мера». Уряд при цьому не має бажання надавати право проведення конкурсу Софії, оскільки там керує суперницька політична партія: Болгарський уряд не мав наміру вливати десятки мільйонів євро державних ре

custom 519285749945102175914🤨3😨3🍓1

Signed 🫨

7 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC484 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇧🇬 Джерело, близьке до ЄМС, стверджує що директорка BNT навмисно затримує визначення міста-господаря Євробачення 2027! Джерело

custom 519285749945102175927🤨3😨1

Signed 🫨

7 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC492 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇧🇹 Переможця Rhythm of Bhutan буде визначено за допомогою наступної пропорції голосування: 40% журі, 40% глядачі Бутану та 20% Решта Світу

14🏆8🔥2🥰21

Signed 🫨

6 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC517 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇹 Ось так зараз виглядає загальний рейтинг Rhythm of Bhutan 2026 у My Eurovision Scoreboard!

20🔥6🥰3custom 51928574994510217592🏆1custom 53553361079637202101

Signed Mark поліція сексуальності

6 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC544 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇹 Rhythm of Bhutan вже у My Eurovision Scoreboard!

😍24🏆43🔥1

Signed 🫨

6 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC493 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇳🇴 Ulrikke поділилась чудовою новиною: співачка знову вагітна!

🔥24😭6custom 51928574994510217594🎉1💋1🥰1

Signed 🫨

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @europium_esc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

🇧🇹 Найкраща пісня Rhythm of Bhutan

  1. Baeyul 301 - དྲན་པ། / Drenpa (The Memories)17%
  2. Karma Drupchu - ཕ་གཡུས། / Pha Yuel (The Homeland)23%
  3. Nyendra - ལྷ་ཡི་སྲས་མོ། / Lhayi semo (The Angel)18%
  4. Pelden Wangchuk - འགྱོ་འགྲུལ། / Jo'druel (THE JOURNEY)6%
  5. Sangay Lhaden - པད་མའི་ཚེ་དབང་བཀྲ་ཤིས། / Pemi Tshewang Tashi (The Legend)36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 889,219 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EUROPIUM | EUROVISION | ЄВРОБАЧЕННЯ” (@europium_esc), 1,723 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/europium_esc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.