3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,291–1,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 17:41
1,291
-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:33
1,293
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:04
1,293
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
297 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
92
31.0%
🔥
86
29.0%
❤
62
20.9%
🤯
13
4.38%
🙏
9
3.03%
🎄
8
2.69%
👏
8
2.69%
👌
6
2.02%
🤔
4
1.35%
🤩
4
1.35%
💯
3
1.01%
🙈
2
0.673%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @euroexpertacademy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 December 2025 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
То, что происходит в мировой экономике и финансовой системе и активно обсуждается международным оценочным сообществом, должно приводить к повышению стоимости услуг по оценке.
То, что происходит на нашем рынке, приводит к обратному😬
На эти мысли меня натолкнуло изучение последних статей Дамодарана и очередного документа Совета по Международным стандартам оценки "Управление и раскрытие неопределённости стоимости", выш…
Дорогие друзья!
25.06.2026 в ВЭБ.РФ состоится мультиэкспертный разбор кейса с панельной дискуссией «Обесценение активов - от бухучёта до налоговых рисков».
🗓️ 25 июня 2026, 10:00 (регистрация с 10:00 до 10:30)
📍 ВЭБ.РФ, Городские лаборатории, Москва, ул. Воздвиженка, 10
🎯 Участие бесплатное, по регистрации — [email protected]
Присоединяйтесь, будет интересно!
🔥🔥🔥Готовимся к "выпускному" одного из наших самых больших потоков программы повышения квалификации по направлению "Оценка и финансовое моделирование"
Процесс подготовки такого количества удостоверений занимает несколько дней, включая внесение данных в ФИС ФРДО - Федеральную информационную систему "Федеральный реестр сведений о документах об образовании". Это государственная база данных, в которой хранятся сведения о…
Самый дорогой бренд на рынке коммерческих услуг - Deloitte (по версии агентства BrandFinance)
cтоит больше 41 млрд долларов и единственный из Big4 имеет рейтинг AAA+
Это мир в цветах ERP.
Согласно данным Дамодарана, риски инвестиций в акции (ERP) с начала конфликта на Ближнем Востоке выросли по всему миру. Кстати, и страновой риск для США тоже.
На рисунке в таблице данные Дамодарана на начало 2026 года и 31.03.26.
Вышла новая редакция Международных стандартов оценки-2028
Не успели мы еле-еле выпустить перевод Международных стандартов оценки-2025, а уже готовы новые, которые сейчас находятся в стадии обсуждения и вступят в силу с 31 января 2028 года.
Основные изменения:
⏺️ Существенно пересмотрены все стандарты по активам.
⏺️ Удален как отдельный стандарт МСО410 «Недвижимость на стадии девелопмента», часть теста включена в ст…
Согласно нашей практике, многие клиенты все еще хотят видеть оценку бизнеса в том числе по мультипликаторам.
Как вы думаете, можно использовать мультипликаторы по зарубежным компаниям?
Конфликт на Ближнем Востоке: влияние глобальное, но насколько разное.
КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СИГНАЛЫ И ВЫВОДЫ
По понятным причинам из нашего еженедельного отчета на 6 страниц выделю основные тренды и приведу для примера несколько графиков из нашей системы
🔻Наблюдаемая негативная динамика показателей должна рассматриваться в контексте высокой базы предыдущих периодов (2024–2025 гг.).
🔹Зафиксировано изменение структуры входящего потока лидов и снижение их качества. Общее количество лидов с начала го…
🔥9❤5💯3🤯2🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @euroexpertacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академия Евроэксперт” (@euroexpertacademy), 1,291 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/euroexpertacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
